Kicking Ass: The Democratic Party's Blog

From the Inside Out: Remaking the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division

Posted by on July 24, 2006 at 12:18 PM

Today the Boston Globe reports that the Bush Administration has dramatically changed the hiring procedures for the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division. Instead of hiring career attorneys with strong backgrounds in civil rights law, political appointees have been tasked with hiring new attorneys and are filling the Division with attorneys who have less experience, but more conservative credentials.

John Greenbaum, career attorney in voting rights from 1997 - 2003:

``The clear emphasis has been to hire individuals with conservative credentials," he said. ``If anything, a civil rights background is considered a liability."

Here are some numbers from the article:

  • The percent of lawyers hired with civil rights background has decreased, from 77 to 42 percent since the administration changed the rules to give political appointees more influence in the hiring process.
  • Of those lawyers nearly half, 9 of 19 lawyers gained experience by "defending employers against discrimination lawsuits or by righting against race-conscious policies"
  • The average ranking for the law school attended by successful applicants hired after 2003 has dropped, from 34 in the years before the changes, to 44 after 2003 when hiring changes began.
  • The number of lawyers with conservative credentials has risen sharply.
    • 11: number of lawyers who were members of the conservative Federalist Society
    • 7: number of lawyers who are members of the Republican National Lawyers Association.
    • 2: number of lawyers who volunteered for the Bush-Cheney campaigns.
    • 6: number of lawyers who worked for Christian organizations that promote "socially conservative views".
  • "Several new hires worked for prominent conservatives, including former Whitewater prosecutor Kenneth Starr, former attorney general Edwin Meese, Mississippi Senator Trent Lott, and Judge Charles Pickering."


The result of this shift?

"There has been a sea change in the types of cases brought by the division, and that is not likely to change in a new administration because they are hiring people who don't have an expressed interest in traditional civil rights enforcement," said Richard Ugelow, a 29-year career veteran who left the division in 2002.

...

Morale has plunged and experiences lawyers are leaving the division.

...

At a recent NAACP hearing on the state of the Civil Rights Division, David Becker , who was a voting-rights section attorney for seven years before accepting the buyout offer, warned that the personnel changes threatened to permanently damage the nation's most important civil rights watchdog.

``Even during other administrations that were perceived as being hostile to civil rights enforcement, career staff did not leave in numbers approaching this level," Becker said. ``In the place of these experienced litigators and investigators, this administration has, all too often, hired inexperienced ideologues, virtually none of which have any civil rights or voting rights experiences."

The results of this shift can be seen already. President Bush's political appointees in the Justice Department have demonstrated their willingness to push their own agenda, regardless of the effect it will have on civil rights.

...division supervisors overruled the recommendations of longtime career voting-rights attorneys in several high-profile cases, including whether to approve a Texas redistricting plan and whether to approve a Georgia law requiring voters to show photographic identification.

With these hiring changes the Bush Administration has made it even easier to push for discriminatory laws that make it harder for Americans to exercise their freedom to vote and severely weakened an institution which has worked to ensure the protection of civil rights for decades.

Comments (6) «

In other words, after we take back Congress and impeach Bush/Cheney, the next thing we have to do is purge the radical right political appointees out of every dark corner of Washington.

From FEMA & DHS, to NASA and the EPA; From the FCC and the Federal Courts to the UN and the Justice Department, we've got a heck of a lot of housecleaning to do before we get America back on track folks!

This inexperienced and ideological crowd has dug it's claws in every part of our government. It's about time we Kick the Kooks out of Washington and send them back to the holes they crawled out of!

1
DTree on July 24, 2006 at 02:25 PM

What do the Democrats in Congress and the Senate do? Can't you pull it out for a free way to vote?
Don't stand by and allow this to go unchallenged.

2
freeforall on July 24, 2006 at 04:39 PM

This is amazing.Even when W is giving a speech to the NAACP talking of honoring civil rights,he`s basically killing it behind the scenes!Beyond contempt!Where`s the religious values in this?It sounds more like"E Tu Btutus"

3
virgo on July 24, 2006 at 08:04 PM

I was wondering why Bush acquiesced and talked to the NAACP. As we should all know by now, there is usually a reason he does what he does --- or rather there is usually someone else's reason why he does what he does (KV) -- and the reason is usually that the group or organization is being cut off at the knees somewhere behind the scenes while he whines platitudes to the crowd which thinks that this guy is their President.

How many times do we have to be burned before we stay away from the fire? This guy DOES NOT have the good of the American people in mind. How many times do we have to get rejected before we turn away. This guy could care less about average Americans, except for how much we can pour into HIS treasury. We continue to hold out hope. But our hopes are continually dashed. We are fools --- more so than our leader.

4
Rally on July 25, 2006 at 11:20 AM

I'm too frustrated to make a comment without using highly vugar language towards Republicans that will indeed might get me banned from this website so,I'll just say I'm really ****** the **** off right now.

5
FreedomOfSpeechForProgressiveMajority on July 26, 2006 at 03:57 AM

I meant,vulgar.See, I'm so ****** off at this right now,I can't spell correctly.LOL

6
FreedomOfSpeechForProgressiveMajority on July 26, 2006 at 03:58 AM


« Hide Comments

Comments are now closed for this entry.