50-State Strategy

50-State Strategy: Nebraska's Scott Kleeb

Posted by on September 22, 2006 at 04:56 PM

Nebraska Democrats debuted their version of the 50-State Strategy - the 93-County Strategy - over a year ago, and it's paying off.

From Nebraska Democratic Party Executive Director, Barry Rubin:

A new poll conducted by national polling firm Penn, Schoen & Berland Associates September 20-21 shows that the 3rd District congressional race is up for grabs as we enter the last six weeks of the campaign.

When asked who they would vote for “if the election were held today,” 41 percent of definite voters said they would vote for Adrian Smith and 37 percent said they would vote for Scott Kleeb. The margin of error for the entire sample is ±4.87%.

Considering the margin of error and the high percentage of undecided voters – this race is most definitely in play. The poll was conducted among 405 likely voters in Nebraska’s 3rd congressional district.

Obviously, this is exciting news in one of the most Republican-leaning congressional districts in the country. Not only is it exciting for the people of greater Nebraska, it is a clear sign that voters are tired of politics as usual throughout the state and nation.

Kleeb is a candidate I have been watching since early in the cycle. I profiled him and stand by my words:

Scott Kleeb, a forth generation Nebraskan, educated at Yale University, who got his doctorate studying the history of cattle ranching, who lives and works on a ranch and who says:

"We need young people coming back to our state. Folks who get their education and come back to the communities that they're from. That's exactly what I'm doing."

Scott Kleeb is a unique candidate who can give Republican opponent Smith a real run for his money.

Check out his newest ad, here.

And it's not just Kleeb. Nebraska Democrats say their time "is now" and are running to win.

Nebraska Democrats already have a dozen events for the 50-State Turnout. Find one in your state.

Comments (7) «

How does this news from Nebraska qualify as "exciting". All I say is that Kleeb will end up another "also ran". It seems like the opportunity in November is slippong away on many fronts. If this ends up being the case, we better run the village idiot (Dean) and the supposed master strategist (Rahm) out of town on a freakin' rail.

1
fmrvtdem on September 23, 2006 at 10:14 AM

Rahm is leaving after November so good riddance to him and as for Dean no he stays.

2
ap215 on September 23, 2006 at 11:38 AM

How to Get control of Congress Again. Just ask these Republicans, if they supported and voted for Bush's LOANSHARK LAW! I believe all Rubberstamp Republicans Did! Then shove it down their throat and let them choke on it!

Congress Passes Bush's Loan Shark Protection Act 2005

With credit-card company profits skyrocketing into the $30 billion dollar range, Congress passed the (euphemistically titled) Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, by a vote of 302-126. It will force bankrupt poor and middle class people to make payments while continuing the asset-protection trusts for millionaires.

The late Paul Wellstone would always almost single-handedly prevent this bill from passing through procedural methods (R.I.P.). President Clinton pocket-vetoed this bill, the last time Congress tried granting this boondoggle to the credit lobby. Bush, however, said that he is eager to sign the measure--after all, he sold his soul to the credit card companies

How many voters in Red State America would strongly consider electing a Democrat if it meant the cost of their credit cards would go down? How many swing voters would be swung by such an appeal? Most importantly, how many economically-struggling non-voters would take the time to register and vote if they were promised an end to 28% or 29% interest rates and higher when these Loan-shark companies, Like Capital One add on excesive monthly, fees, to make it where you are paying over 50-60% combine interest. on their credit cards?

The answers seem obvious, but that doesn't mean the Democratic Party is paying attention. Last year, Representative Bernie Sanders [Ind-VT], who is currently running for Jim Jefford's Senate seat from Vermont, proposed a "Loan Shark Prevention Act" in the House. He explains it with passion on his website, and in an op-ed piece he wrote, both of which are well worth a read. He doesn't mince words, and shows remarkable backbone in addressing an issue he obviously cares about.This is one reason the Republican National Committee is spending in the millions of dollars to prevent Bernie Sanders from being elected Senator, and the Republican Canidate Richie Rich Tarrant, has already spent 7 million dollars on the most "Low Life" filithy Mud-Slingin TV adds, right from Karl Rove's operations.

Democrats should take note. Almost everyone has a credit card these days, making it an issue of near-universal concern. Of course, it wasn't always this way. When I grew up, credit cards were hard to get, since it wasn't that easy to qualify. This was before the credit industry figured out that giving cards to high-risk people (who often default on their debt) was still more profitable as long as the interest rates to that group as a whole were high enough, and they could add on monthly fees. So now everybody can have a card, but some are paying 40-75%, or even greater interest rates. This used to be called "usury," or - more bluntly - loansharking. Rep. Sanders' bill would put an end to the worst excesses of the credit card industry. It would cap interest rates at 8% above what the IRS charges in interest (a total of 14% when the bill was introduced). It would cap penalties and fees (such as late fees) at $15. It would also restrict when credit card companies could change customers' interest rates, which is today completely unrestricted, due to the new Bush Loan-Shark Laws(Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protuction Act of 2005)

It makes so much sense, it will come as no surprise to hear that the bill disappeared into a Republican-controlled subcommittee last year and hasn't been heard from since. But it seems to be yet another issue that would do wonders for the Democratic Party if they would just get behind it. If you offered voters the choice between a Republican ideologue or someone promising a maximum 15% interest rate on their credit card, who would they vote for? How many suburbanites would respond to such a choice by voting for a Democrat? Enough to win back Congress is my humble prediction. Many of the policy initiatives I proposed How Democrats Can Take Back Congress seem to bear a high cost, since they are what I call "Neo-Populism": by definition, the issues appeal widely to the general public, but they are also strongly opposed by affected corporations and industries (who have enormous vested interests in preserving the status quo). This terrifies Democrats in office (or seeking office) because they are afraid campaign contributions will disappear from these wealthy corporate donors. They should take heart in Jim VandeHei's recent article in the Washington Post titled "Democrats Closing Fundraising Gap With Republicans: Increase in Grass-Roots Support Buoys Party as GOP Efforts Falter."

While the article does admit that things could go either way before this year's election, it points out the trend is towards more grassroots money coming in to Democrats and less going to Republicans, mainly due to the Bush "Loan-shark Laws, passed in 2005. Every stinkin Republican who voted and supported, that act should be Voted out of office! The Democrats should shove that down Bush's and the Republicans throat so they can choke on it, and elect a Democrat Congress, and destroy Bush's power, and the "Rubber-stamp" Republican Congress, and return our government back to a Democracy, so he can no longer cause anymore mischief, and destruction, to the poor and middle classes.

By the way what happen to the 15 Trillion dollars, the 6 trillion surplus before Bush, and the 9 Trillion deficiet we are now in, did the 400 Billionares that Forbes mangazine reported in 2006 get most of it? I think it is time for a change, a BIG change.

3
DemocracyWon on September 23, 2006 at 08:01 PM

Too all of you nay sayers out there who are constantly criticizing the fity state stragety,

I am from Nebraska and because of the fifty state stragety we have a vibrant state party. We have Caucuses something we haven't had in a longtime. Out of 93 counties 63 held County conventions! We had over 300 delegates to the state Convention (I know I was the Credentials Chair)

For those of you who think the Kleeb race is a joke let me put it in perspective for you. Nebraska has not gone blue Since Lyndon B. Johnson. The 3rd CD has not voted for a Democrat in Over 3 decades!
WE have an opportunity to hit the Republicans where it hurts in a state that most of you consider flyover country and if it can happen here it can happen Nationwide.

I know Scott. He cares about Family Famers and keeping young educated Nebraskans in Nebraska. He also is a good Democrat. The republicans are so scared of losing in Nebraska They have sent Rove and Cheney here. This is a good pick up opportunity here!

Please people don't be elistist just because this is Nebraska. Winning big in a solidly red State in the Heartland could have National Implications for Democrats in midterm and Beyond.

We have other races that are gaining momentum here as well. So if you don't have a race where you live Come to the Cornhusker State and help us give the GOP the shock of their Lives and please open up your wallets to our candiadtes as well.

We have some here that aren't taking any PAC money!


Good things are happening in Nebraska. Now we need good Democrats everywhere to make sure that we stay on track here.

4
asop on September 23, 2006 at 11:09 PM

test

5
FreedomOfSpeechForProgressiveMajority on September 24, 2006 at 08:36 AM

asop:

Thank you for that. It's easy to give up when all you see is Republican hegemony, but you and Chairman Dean won't. You are the future of the Democratic party.

Forget the naysayers and the trolls. If they want to whine, complain and give up, let them. The rest of us will still be here fighting for them once they decide it's safe to return.

6
gtrump on September 24, 2006 at 11:07 PM

I am also from Nebraska's thrid district.

The 50 state plan is a God send to dems living in "red" states.

The NE-03 race is easily going to be one of the most exciting races this November because a Dem has a chance to become the first democrat to ever be elected to the NE-03 since the creation of the current third district after Nebraska lost one of its 4 CD's.

The race is a statistical tie. 41-37 with 4.87% margin of error. Also with 23% undecided it means that there is a great potential for Kleeb to make up ground.

I'm not sure what the current financial statistics are at the moment, the next manditory release of the data is Sep. 30, but Kleeb had about three times as more cash on hand than his neo-facist opponent Adrian Smith after the primary. Smith spend something like $500,000 to basically buy his primary victory. The candidates just had their first televised debate and Kleeb did great.

This election is between a professional politician who in his 16 years in the Nebraska Unicameral, has only managed to pass 8% of the bills that he proposed, who has taken $400,000 from the Club for Growth while running in an Ag state, and a ranch hand who was born over seas on a U.S. Army base, the son of educators for the dependents of military personel, whose Nebraskan heritage goes back 4 generations who has a PhD. on the history of cattle ranching from Yale.

This guy needs the support of dems all over the country. If the GOP loses here of all places, it would illistrate to all of the world that Americans are not happy with the Republicans.

7
Quanta on September 28, 2006 at 10:43 PM


« Hide Comments

Comments are now closed for this entry.