Here i am :-)

newsweek has excerpts from woodward's book, state of denial. they are of course mind bending:

incompetence beyond imagination

a brief purvue of recent news articles found on google news seems to indicate pugthugs are saying (surprise, surprise) one thing and doing quite another. at the local level they're claiming to be distancing themselves from the idiot-in-chief while at the same time on the national level, they're giving him everything he wants. they need to be called out on this particular bit of hypocracy-as-usual. has the rnc and kkkroverbutt sent out the word that anyone voting against dunce-in-charge will be toast in 2008?

The slower job growth regime marches onward

by Jared Bernstein with research assistance from Yulia Fungard

Employment continued to grow at a moderate pace last month, as payrolls expanded by 128,000 overall, and 111,000 in the private sector, according to today's report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Average hours worked per week also fell slightly, while the unemployment rate was essentially unchanged, down a statistically insignificant one-tenth of a point to 4.7%.

Over the past five months, job market activity has slowed in tandem with the rest of economy, as higher interest rates, energy costs, and now the slumping housing market have dampened hiring. The monthly growth in payrolls since April has averaged 119,000, well off the pace of the 206,000 of the prior five months.

Excluding government employment from the analysis provides a clearer look at labor demand generated by the private sector. As shown in the chart below, which compares the last five months to the prior five, monthly job growth has slowed by about half.

As for another sign of weakening demand, average hours worked fell back slightly last month, both for weekly hours and for total hours worked by the private, non-supervisory workforce. The average workweek fell by one-tenth of an hour, as most industries cut back on weekly hours. Professional services, an important bellwether of service-sector strength, cut the workweek by 0.3 tenths of an hour.

Total hours worked, a measure of aggregate demand, fell by 0.2%, the largest decline in a year. Slower job growth and flat weekly hours in recent months is showing up clearly in this series: on a quarterly basis, total hours worked are up at an annual rate of 1.2%, the slowest growth rate in over a year (excluding the months affected by Hurricane Katrina).

The recent indicators of sharp weakening in the residential housing market make it a sector worth extra scrutiny. After falling by 17,000 over the prior three months, jobs in this area (residential building, contractors, real estate, and mortgage brokers) rose by 10,000 last month, including 4,000 added jobs in home building. Still, over the year thus far, these industries have contributed 5% of private sector job growth, compared to 17% in 2005.

Factory payrolls slid by 11,000 last month, following a 23,000 job loss in July. Though the manufacturing sector has had a few positive months lately, the level of manufacturing employment—14.2 million—is 2.7 million below its level at the peak on the last business cycle in March 2001.

The long employment slide in this key sector is also evident in the hourly wage trends of blue-collar workers. Despite the fact that manufacturing productivity has soared since 2000, up 29%, wage growth has slowed sharply. The chart below shows annual nominal wage changes for production workers in manufacturing since 2000. Over the past year, wages for these workers are up 1%, far behind inflation, and the slowest annual growth rate since the 1940s.

http://www.epi.org/content.cfm/webfeatures_econindicators_jobspict_20060901

****

Yeah, that's one helluva of an accomplishment Brownie (oh I mean Bushie ... is there any difference?).

a brief purvue of recent news articles found on google news seems to indicate pugthugs are saying (surprise, surprise) one thing and doing quite another. at the local level they're claiming to be distancing themselves from the idiot-in-chief while at the same time on the national level, they're giving him everything he wants
****

Stick it to them. The best way is with LTE's. I even read one Repug supporter claim today that Mike Ferguson (R-NJ) really is a liberal. What a hoot! This is a man who voted to raid social security trust fund 9 times, approves of the Iraq war, approves of Bush's tax cuts for billionaires, approves of corporate welfare for oil & gas companies, voted to prevent Medicare from lowering prices through bulk purchases, is against embryonic stem cell research, is anti-choice. But, his supporters have the gall to claim that he a liberal that doesn't rubber stamp Bush. Call them out!

White House in crisis over 'Iraq lies' claims. Watergate journalist's new book threatens to demolish Bush's credibility and boost Democrats ahead of mid-term elections.

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world/story/0,,1884879,00.html

What's with this sex pervert Frosty-Bean-Bags? Everytime another Republican pedophile gets exposed, he starts howling, "It's OK to have sex with anyone older than ten!" What's up with that cretin?

On the way out, Bush slapped Garner on the back. “Hey Jay, you want to do Iran?”

What's up with that cretin?
****

domingo,

The Frosted Bean Bag gets off on the pervo stuff.

Most Iraqis Favor Immediate US Pullout, Polls Show
By Amit R. Paley

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092706S.shtml

slime bites rove
by anna shane [Subscribe]
Sat Sep 30, 2006 at 05:40:15 PM PDT

Rove has his hands filled this time, trying to spin a failed state, keeping Bush from disintegrating on screen, while worrying about indictments to come. The tactics were broadcast, encourage voter machine tampering, suppress anti-bush voting, and dig up slime on every Democrat. That last one hasn't worked out.
anna shane's diary :: ::

Unfortunately for the Republicans 'going negative' is ending up biting them harder. Now their poster boy for caring about kids turns out to be a pedophile. And if that's not enough, we learn there was even a cover up. Reminds one of the pedophile priests, getting transferred from church to church. Hypocrisy isn't a partisan affair, but this year it sure seems like it. All that sanctimony just attracts perverts, go figure.

****

Yep, attracts perverts and GOOPER trolls that defend them (or is it admire them?).

President Carter: Bush Has Brought US "International Disgrace"
The Associated Press

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15059563

re: plame, libby argued in court this week that if he is prosecuted for lying to the fbi he will try to give up state secrets while defending himself. some may have given up on fitzmas but i still believe...

Baghdad - A strong majority of Iraqis want U.S.-led military forces to immediately withdraw from the country, saying their swift departure would make Iraq more secure and decrease sectarian violence, according to new polls by the State Department and independent researchers.

In Baghdad, for example, nearly three-quarters of residents polled said they would feel safer if U.S. and other foreign forces left Iraq, with 65 percent of those asked favoring an immediate pullout, according to State Department polling results obtained by The Washington Post.

****

Can you blame them? Our presense in their country is just making matters worst. The Iraqi have consistently said from the start that they are glad Saddam is gone but they want us out fast as well. Give these people their country back you GOOPER hypocrites. If the GOOPER's really believe in the "freedom agenda" then they should start by giving the Iraqi their freedom. But they won't because they are hypocrites, liars, torturers and perverts.

When the leaders of Pakistan and Afghanistan visited the United States last week, they got into an ugly public spat over who was to blame for a Taliban resurgence that has killed hundreds of Afghans this year and shaken confidence in Afghanistan’s new government. Full story:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/01/weekinreview/01rohde.html?hp&ex=1159675200&en=2353668c775b74a6&ei=5094&partner=homepage

Fun in the 'Burbs meme: Pedophile Republicans
by mcd [Subscribe]
Sat Sep 30, 2006 at 05:33:35 PM PDT

Being urban Democrats, we happened to go out to a social event in the burbs today, knowing that some of these folks are pretty strong republicans. Kept the message pretty simple: "Have you heard about Congressman Foley and the Hastert Coverup? Even Boehner and Roy Blunt probably knew. It's time to get rid of these pedophile republicans." Jaws dropped, but even the GOP'ers couldn't disagree--and many agreed. Link 'em all and sink 'em all.
****

Stick it to them! This is it. The issue that finally breaks their backs. They said for years that they are the party of "family values". Now, the truth is out there that they are the party of slime.

I feel I have to let everyone know how upset I am that the horrendous detainee bill passed - with the vote of my 2 NJ Senators (to whom I e-mailed my displeasure). It is a shameful piece of legislation. It is nothing more than a power grab by a terrible administration. The dangers to all of us are suddenly getting much too real. I want us as Democrats and as Constitutional believers to start opposing such shredding of our liberties and not cave in because we fear being labeled "soft on terror". I'm not so concerned about terrorists now; I'm more concerned about tyranny at home.

INDEPTH: AFGHANISTAN
In the line of duty: Canada's casualties

http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/afghanistan/casualties/total.html

"Mission Accomplished"

Politicians and military experts have been responding to a warning from a senior diplomat that civil war is more likely in Iraq than democracy.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/5241124.stm

and dig up slime on every Democrat

Posted by rjsnj on September 30, 2006 at 09:16 PM

and they don't even need to dig up 'real' slime. they just make some up and because they think everyone other than themselves is dumb, gullible, and stupid, repeat it over and over as if it were truth. forget doing unto others as you would have them do unto you. try, do unto others what ever you want...again, and again, and again....

I'm not so concerned about terrorists now; I'm more concerned about tyranny at home.
****

I am glad to hear you say that. I say that it takes real courage to stand up for civil liberties. It's just so darned hard to fight for that issue. People think that you are worrying about something that will never effect them. The problem with that line of thinking is that once it bites them, it's too late.

Republicans: Party of Pedophilia and Torture
by maxschell [Subscribe]
Sat Sep 30, 2006 at 04:29:08 PM PDT

The Republicans have seen fit to destroy our liberty and desecrate our Constitution.

They have sought to cover up and validate the Executive Branch's power grab, while at the same time covering up and legitimizing torture done in OUR name with OUR tax payer dollars.

Now, it turns out, in addition to covering up for Bush and his torture squad, they are covering up for the pedophiles in their midst.

It is time to link these issues. Republicans Torture. Republicans are Pedophiles. They must be stopped.

and they don't even need to dig up 'real' slime. they just make some up
****

It's easy to do that when there is a pro GOOPER media echo chamber.

Posted by rjsnj on September 30, 2006 at 09:32 PM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

First they came for the Jews
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the Communists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left
to speak out for me.

Pastor Martin Niemöller

Frightening Balance Sheet
By Pierre Haski
Libération

Thursday 28 September 2006

A European diplomat assigned to Baghdad recently summarized the situation in Iraq: "If the Americans leave, it's a disaster; if they stay, it will get worse … "This choice between two bad solutions provides a measure of the trap into which George W. Bush has jumped all by himself and which - unable to extricate himself - he pretends to perfectly master. With aplomb, the American president continues to proclaim that he is winning the "war against terrorism" when his own intelligence services assert the opposite. With the midterm elections in his sights, George W. Bush still succeeds in lulling a segment of public opinion, while the number of American victims in Iraq has just exceeded 2,700 and the civil war - whether you call it that or not - rages between communities and within each community. Only Kurdistan is getting what it wants from the situation and is gently putting off to sea, at the risk of exploding the Iraqi Federation. The balance sheet would already be damning if it were limited to the domestic Iraqi situation alone. It becomes frightening when one analyzes the regional and international consequences of the Iraqi fiasco: a gift given to Iran in its quest for power and a serious boost for the jihadist movement in the world. George W. Bush and his never-changing accomplice Donald Rumsfeld have undoubtedly committed a profound historic mistake, dragging a few of their allies along with them, like Tony Blair. A mistake that the Iraqi people - who briefly believed themselves liberated from a sinister dictator - pay dearly for today. And the negative impact of which the world is not finished suffering.

Then they came for me
and there was no one left
to speak out for me.

Pastor Martin Niemöller
****

Amen Pastor ... history has a way of repeating itself.

Torture breeds terror

Published: September 30 2006 03:00 | Last updated: September 30 2006 03:00

For decades, America was the moral leader of the world on the laws of war. But now President George W. Bush has traded that moral high ground for a few paltry votes - maybe not even enough to save the Republicans from losing the House of Representatives in the coming elections.

Earlier this week, he strong-armed his own party and terrified the Democrats into passing a new military tribunals law that gives him the power to detain indefinitely anyone who meets a shockingly broad new definition of an "unlawful enemy combatant"; strips detainees in US military prisons of the sacred right of "habeas corpus", or the right to challenge their detention in federal court; and immunises US officials from prosecution for the worst of what they did at Abu Graib, or in the secret prisons where the most valuable captives were held.

Of course, in America's divided system of government, neither the president nor even the Congress has the last word: the new law will certainly be challenged in court, perhaps all the way up to the Supreme Court.

Ironically, one of the first detainees to challenge it could be Salem Ahmed Hamdan, the man who made history in June by persuading the Supreme Court to declare Mr Bush's military tribunals illegal in the first place.

The Supreme Court told Mr Bush to go away and get congressional authorisation for the tribunals, which he had tried to set up on his own. But the court did not give him or the Congress carte blanche to write whatever rules they wanted - and many, perhaps a majority of the justices, will not like what he came up with.

They are likely to be particularly concerned by the provisions stripping detainees of the right to go to court. That part of the law could face an almost immediate test, as Mr Hamdan - whose case is now back in a federal district court - will almost certainly claim that it violates the US constitution. His case could end up back before the Supreme Court, some time in the next couple of years.

But if, as seems likely, a protracted court battle still lies ahead before any of the detainees can actually be tried under the new military tribunals law, one can be forgiven for wondering what all this haste has achieved. Even if it saves a few Republican seats - which is far from certain - it will surely do little to help bring terrorists to justice.

Indeed, it could do quite the opposite. Intelligence assessments leaked in the US and Britain, just as Congress was putting the final touches to the new bill, should have forced legislators to think about the unintended consequences of their actions.

Those assessments argued persuasively that America's war on terrorism has so far done little more than radicalise an entire generation of Muslims around the world. The new bill may accentuate that trend: how else can young Muslims be expected to react to a bill that legalises the torture of their compatriots?

Mr Bush seems genuinely to think he needs these measures to protect Americans from terrorism. But he is wrong. Ordinary Americans will be paying for decades to come for the short-sighted strategies of their president and his party, and the failure of the Democrats to stand fast against a law that is certainly immoral and possibly unconstitutional.

The courts may strike down big parts of the new law, but the damage has already been done.

Financial Times editorial

rjsnj...your LTE suggestion isn't a bad thing and more of us should write to our editors. but given my personal predispositions, i lack a certain amount of tact. we should all exercise a bit of restraint when publically exposing repugs to riducule regarding their actions. many people who have defined themselves as republican are, in fact, descent and worthwhile human beings who vote their conscience and need only to be shown another more just way. it doesn't help our cause to lump them all into the same garbage bag. don't get me wrong...i still think we should "give 'em hell!" at every opportunity.

evening all, drifting thru and after scanning the comments came to a thought... it's time to counter the faith based moron idiot trying to play commander and chief with his slogan of "cut 'n run" with one of our own...

the moron: SPENDIN' AND BLUNDERIN'

have a nice evening. our finest in iraq are having one hell...

AMY GOODMAN: Our guests are Vermont Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy and Michael Ratner of the Center for Constitutional Rights. He is president there. Michael Ratner, your response, as we speak with the senator about this groundbreaking legislation?

MICHAEL RATNER: Well, I think Senator Leahy really got it right. I mean, what this bill authorizes is really the authority of an authoritarian despot to the president. I mean, what it gives him is the power, as the senator said, to detain any person anywhere in the world, citizen or non-citizen, whether living in the United States or anywhere else. I mean, what kind of authority is that? No checks and balances. Nothing. Now, if you’re a citizen, you still get your right of habeas corpus. If you’re a non-citizen, as the senator pointed out, you’re completely finished. Picked up, legal permanent resident in the United States, detained forever, no writ of habeas corpus.

It was incredibly shocking. I watched that vote yesterday. I had been in Washington for two or three days trying to line up the votes for Senator Leahy’s amendment that would have restored habeas. We thought we had them. We lost at 51 to 48. I have to tell you, Amy, I just -- I basically broke down at that point. I had been working like a dog on this thing. And there I saw the President come to Capitol Hill and persuade two or three or four of the Republicans who we thought we had to vote to strip habeas corpus from this legislation. It was a shock. I mean, an utter shock.

So you have this ability to detain anyone anywhere in the world. You deny them the writ of habeas corpus. And when they're in detention, you have a right to do all kinds of coercive techniques on them: hooding, stripping, anything really the president says goes, short of what he defines as torture. And then, if you are lucky enough to be tried, and I say “lucky enough,” because, for example, the 460 people the Center represents at Guantanamo may never get trials. In fact, only ten have even been charged. Those people, they’ve been stripped of their right to go to court and test their detention by habeas corpus. They’re just -- they’ve been there five years. Right now, under this legislation, they could be there forever.

Let me tell you, this bill will be struck down and struck down badly. But meanwhile, for two more years or whatever it’s going to take us to litigate it, we’re going to be litigating what was a basic right, as the senator said, since the Magna Carta of 1215, the right of any human being to test their detention in court. It’s one of the saddest days I’ve seen. You’ve called it “groundbreaking,” Amy. It’s really Constitution-breaking. It’s Constitution-shattering. It shatters really basic rights that we've had for a very long time.

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/09/29/150254

the issue is not that foley is gay. the issue is that foley used his position of power to sexually solice and harass high school kids.

rjsnj
AMEN.....outta here for the nite..............

g'nite dems.....it can only get better from here............

Greetings gregg,

Is it solace? He did sound as if he would help with the raging hormone thing.

Bush economy pays off, we have 100 more BILLIONAIRES, YIPPIE!!!
by PLS [Subscribe]
Sat Sep 30, 2006 at 06:20:41 PM PDT

Common Dreams has an opinion piece that finally shows that Bush has done a bang up job on the economy. It has been growing amazingly, as a matter of fact, Bush's policy has created 100 new billionaires. Or his "base", as he calles them, the "have-mores". Aren't you happy that you gave up wage increases, job security, a living wage, and health care now? It has made us more competetive remember, so we can compete in the global marketplace. I am willing to bet that America is beating the pants off of the "civilized world" in one area, that being how many billionaires we have.

The piece starts out by observing;
Millionaires are so last millennium. The new Forbes 400 list of richest Americans is Billionaires only.

****

Yep, that's the Bush economy. It's feudalism. That's why they are creating laws that give the government totalitarian power. They know that this upside down economy will eventually collapse and the billionaires at the top want to protected from the angry "mobs".

geez tom i really do need to edit don't i? meant to write solicit of course.

Things are getting scary out there.

The torture bill.

Our seperation of Church from State is in danger.

But...I do think that the American People are coming around.

I wish everyone could hear the special commentary that Olbermann (MSNBC) made on Monday in regards to the Wallace interview. But unfortunately not everyone will hear it. Instead they hear Katie C. calling it a Tantrum and slapping the hands of everyone who is finger pointing.

Scary times indeed.

I wish everyone could hear the special commentary that Olbermann (MSNBC) made on Monday in regards to the Wallace interview. But unfortunately not everyone will hear it. Instead they hear Katie C. calling it a Tantrum and slapping the hands of everyone who is finger pointing.
****

Katie Couric is a corporate media shill. It was a great commentary.

Middle-Class Families in Worse Shape Than Ever
Reuters

Thursday 28 September 2006
Typical families have not stashed enough money; struggling to pay for home, insurance, and education according to Center for American Progress.

Washington - The typical double-income family is worse off financially than ever, a study released Thursday said, warning that few Americans have saved enough to brace for financial setbacks.

Middle-class families are struggling to pay for a home, health insurance, transportation and their children's college with wages that have not kept pace with higher prices, according to the study by a think tank headed by a former top aide to President Bill Clinton.

The middle class's financial condition has been a key issue ahead of the November elections, as Democrats warn that this group is fast losing economic ground amid skyrocketing prices and tax cuts that offer them little benefit.

"In our estimates, it's becoming harder for families to afford what we consider a typical middle-class lifestyle," said economist Christian Weller of the Center for American Progress, the political think tank headed by John Podesta, a former Clinton chief of staff.

Weller cautioned that while Americans are taking on more debt to cover higher costs, wages have not kept pace.

The majority of Americans have not socked away enough money to brace for financial setbacks such as a job loss or a medical emergency.

According to the study, less than a third of all American families have accumulated income equaling three months of their wages. The trend is particularly pronounced among the 60 percent income distribution that makes up the middle class: those with dual incomes earning from $18,500 to $88,030 a year.

From 2001 to 2004, the proportion of middle-class families that has saved three months' worth of income dropped to 18.3 percent from 28.8 percent, the study said.

Higher prices for a range of things - including health care, energy, transportation, food and education - have put Americans in this position as corporate profits have risen, the study said.

It said, that five years into the current economic recovery, average job growth is one-fifth that of previous business cycles and wages are flat when inflation is factored into the equation.

To maintain day-to-day consumption, families have taken on a record amount of debt, equal to 126.4 percent of disposable income in the first quarter of 2006, according to the study.

Commenting on the study, SEIU Labor Union President Andy Stern said, "Of the total amount of our economy and income, we have the greatest share going to profits in modern history and the least amount going to wages in modern history."

"For most working Americans, things are far worse than any time certainly in recent history and at a time of an incredibly growing economy." said Stern, whose union represents 1.1 million health care workers.

Health care industry leader Abbott Laboratories Inc., Johnson & Johnson, and Guidant Corp. edged higher late Thursday in New York.
****

More evidence of the crappy Bush economy.

I was glad to see President Clinton get in Chris Wallaces face and really lay it on him.That network (FOX) under Murdocks control and agenda is always a tilted, slanted and otherwise republican spin organization.Mr. Clinton, keep on keep'in on, for the good of the people of this country

This is kinda weird:

Wal-Mart launches registration drive

By Jonathan Birchall in New York

Published: September 29 2006 18:34 | Last updated: September 29 2006 18:34

Wal-Mart, the largest US retailer, on Friday launched a drive to encourage its 1.3m employees to register to vote, in the biggest operation of its kind ever by a US private employer.

The company has begun distributing voter registration packages – including postage-paid application forms – to more than 17,000 employees at its stores and warehouses in Iowa, with other states due to follow.

http://www.ft.com/home/us

I was glad to see President Clinton get in Chris Wallaces face and really lay it on him.

****

Me too. I said it's about freakin time that someone blasted these right wingers at Faux News.

if the fundgelicals are right and the 'rapture' is upon us, then it must be coming in november! i'm outta here, g'nite all.

G.O.P. Leaders Knew in Late ’05 of E-Mail

By CARL HULSE and RAYMOND HERNANDEZ
Published: October 1, 2006
WASHINGTON, Sept. 30 — Top House Republicans knew for months about e-mail traffic between Representative Mark Foley and a former teenage page, but kept the matter secret and allowed Mr. Foley to remain head of a Congressional caucus on children’s issues, Republican lawmakers said Saturday.

The exchanges began with what Republicans now describe as an “overfriendly” e-mail message from Mr. Foley to the unidentified teenager. But news reports about the exchanges have led to the disclosure of e-mail correspondence with other former pages in which the discussions became more and more sexually explicit. Shortly after he was confronted by ABC News on Friday about the subject, Mr. Foley, who represented a south Florida district, resigned from the House.

....overly friendly...nice. i can smell hastert's ass on fire from new york....and the smell ain't pretty.

Replacing the Big Three
By Robert Reich
TomPaine.com

Tuesday 26 September 2006

Once it gets through its latest round of job cuts, Ford will have fewer American workers than Toyota. General Motors has become a shadow of its former self. The only car on its drawing board that has a chance of big sales will be built in South Korea. Meanwhile, Chrysler is swimming in red ink and planning major plant closings. By the way, Chrysler is now part of Daimler-Chrysler, headquartered in Germany.

Detroit's Big Three are shrinking into the Small Three. They now employ 15 percent fewer workers than they did a decade ago, and half the number they employed forty years ago. Meanwhile, Toyota, Honda, and Nissan are the New Three. Toyota is inching up on GM, and Honda is surpassing Chrysler.

But here's the truly stunning thing: Toyota, Honda, and Nissan are making most of the cars they sell in the United States here in the United States, with American workers. And they're building new plants in the US as fast as they can. In a few years more Americans will be working for Japanese automakers than work for American.

Does it really make any difference? Maybe to our national pride.

But, hey, we have the largest retailer in the world, don't we? Wal-Mart now employs more people than does the entire US auto industry. We also have the world's largest and most expensive health care industry and biggest military. Over the last five years, health care and the military have been responsible for almost all the net new jobs created in America.

But the real issue isn't the number of jobs. It's their quality, and that's the big problem. Detroit's Big Three paid wages, health and pension benefits that together amounted to about $80 an hour in today's money. The Japanese transplants in America pay half as much. Wal-Mart pays less than a quarter as much. Meanwhile, hospital orderlies and elder-care workers don't come near matching the United Auto Workers at the old Big Three. And military work is just plain dangerous.

So as the Big Three shrink, we ought to be making up for the good jobs we're losing. One place to start would be for the nation to invest in emerging industries like bio-technology, non-fossil based energy, new materials and nanotechnologies. Out these could come the good middle-class jobs of the 21st century - technician-type jobs involving upgrading, installing, repairing, injecting, testing, or improving upon a host of products designed to prevent the spread of dread diseases, give us energy without further warming the globe, and improve the speed and durability of countless items.

Even now, there's a large and growing demand for pharmacy technicians, lab technicians, hospital technicians, and office technicians. In this post auto-worker age, young people need some education beyond high school to get these and other technical skills of the future.

The sad fact is they aren't getting them. According to a recent report of the National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, the post-boomer generation is less educated than the boomers, and less able to afford college. Their families can't afford the cost. And government isn't filling the gap. Pell Grants for college are less available than they were a decade or two ago. Colleges are less affordable. Federal money for job training is drying up.

There's no bringing back the Big Three. But shame on us for turning our backs on the big picture.

****

First Mr. Reich, you need to get rid of the GOOPERS. They are anti-science, anti-government research. They are against stimulating the economy by demand side economics. They lie to the public about supply side economics - meaning giving tax breaks to billionaires. They tell the public this create jobs. It's a blatant lie. There is no economic evidence to support this claim. The record speaks for itself. Bush has the worst job creation record in history.

The Globalization Excuse
By Susan B. Hansen
TomPaine.com

Friday 22 September 2006

Last week, the Chicago City Council failed to rally enough votes to overturn Mayor Daley's veto of a "living wage" ordinance. The measure, first passed by the council in July under national media attention, would have required big-box retailers like Wal-Mart and Target to pay a higher minimum wage. Opponents of the minimum-wage hike claimed it would cost Chicago jobs. Businesses wouldn't be able to compete with other states and cities that don't have a high minimum wage, they fretted. The evidence suggests otherwise.

The old "high wages will make us less competitive" excuse gets trotted out whenever there's a move to increase the minimum wage. And it works. This year, Congress again failed to raise the federal minimum wage of $5.15, which has not been increased since 1997. And the latest report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics showed that median hourly wages have declined despite gains in productivity. Wages and salaries now make up the lowest share of GDP since 1947, while corporate profits are at record highs. Put another way: Citizen earnings are at historic lows, while corporate earnings are way, way up.

To rationalize this lopsided state of affairs, the "global economy" is often blamed. We often hear that in an increasingly integrated world economy, American workers must accept lower wages, fewer benefits and less job security in order to compete with China, India or other developing countries. But what we don't often hear is that the costs and benefits of globalization represent concrete political choices, not economic inevitability. Many countries - and some American states - have successfully combined international competitiveness with decent living standards for their workers. On the other hand, some places that have cut wages and benefits have not only failed to become more competitive in the international market, but have suffered adverse social and political consequences.

My recent research on American states provides evidence to support these claims. In the United States - unlike other more centralized European countries - many policies that influence labor costs are determined at least in part at the state level. Examples include so-called right-to-work laws, legal provisions affecting employment at will, unemployment insurance eligibility and benefit levels, and workers' compensation. Twenty-two states now have minimum-wage laws above the federal minimum.

In America, the cost of labor - that is, workers' wages and benefits - has dropped dramatically over the past 30 years. A comprehensive index of what employers pay for labor per state shows a decline in labor costs of 25 percent since 1970, and economic factors - loss of industrial jobs, international competition - are certainly part of the explanation. But politics matters as well; I found that the best single predictor of trends in state labor costs was voter turnout! States with low and declining labor costs, such as Kentucky, Nevada, and South Carolina, have experienced a falloff in voter turnout. But where ordinary citizens vote in larger numbers, aided by competitive political parties and grassroots labor organizations, labor costs - both manufacturing wages and benefits - have actually increased. In states with referenda, such as Florida and Nevada, ballot measures to increase the state minimum wage have passed with significant majorities.

So have international markets punished the states where labor costs have remained high? On the contrary; states leading in manufacturing exports - such as Washington - or foreign direct investment - California and New York - are the states that pay higher wages. But states such as Arkansas, Idaho and West Virginia - which have cut their labor costs most drastically since the 1970s - rank in the lowest quartiles in terms of exports. Higher state labor costs are also associated with faster growth in gross state product, education levels, productivity and personal income.

International data support these conclusions as well. According to the World Competitiveness Index, the most competitive country in the world is Finland, and the other Scandinavian "welfare states" with generous unemployment and health care policies also rank in the Top 10. Countries such as Estonia, Ireland, Singapore, and South Korea, which have invested heavily in education, have also attracted high levels of foreign investment.

What about jobs and employment? My research showed that trends in state labor costs have little impact on unemployment rates, which remain higher in central cities and in isolated rural areas. Despite its drastic cuts in state labor costs, West Virginia still has the nation's highest unemployment rates. Job growth is modestly greater in states with lower labor costs. But many of these jobs are part-time, low-paid and offer few, if any, benefits. Thus declines in state labor costs are associated with a number of negative social outcomes: higher rates of crime, poverty, suicide, divorce and births to single mothers. Creating a few more low-paid jobs does not counter these adverse trends.

Congress and the presidency, firmly under Republican control, may invoke international competition and "globalization" to justify their refusal to raise the minimum wage and for shifting the tax burden from wealth and capital to workers' wages. But in many states, political officials have made other choices: to increase the state minimum wage, to enact the Earned Income Tax Credit to benefit the working poor, to expand rather than restrict access to workers' compensation and unemployment benefits. The global economic system is not a static, immutable force over which we are powerless. Indeed, it is the officials we elect who can influence how the costs and benefits of globalization are distributed.

WASHINGTON, Sept. 30 — Top House Republicans knew for months about e-mail traffic between Representative Mark Foley and a former teenage page, but kept the matter secret and allowed Mr. Foley to remain head of a Congressional caucus on children’s issues, Republican lawmakers said Saturday.
****

Hastert, Reynolds and Alexander are co-conspirators. They all must go.

oh well...one more comment. last night, mclaughlin said the clinton/wallace 'slap down' (my term, not his) was a net gain for democrats! embolding dems is a good thing and we need more of it. ok, now i'm gone.

Pages are high school students who attend classes under congressional supervision and work as messengers.

"It looks to me that it was more important to hold onto a seat and to hold onto power than to take care of our children," Mahoney said. "I think that's wrong. I think that's what's wrong with Washington."

Posted by gregg on September 30, 2006 at 07:26 P

Why in the world are high school kids being privately supervised by individual congressmen? This wouldn't be allowed in a regular high school.

What sickens me the most about this is that the same stuff Foley was suggesting to those House Pages is exactly what "The Professionals" were doing to Iraqi boys at Abu Graibe and probably in secret Pentagon gulags around the globe. And now the whole world knows where it got its inspiration....and why the Bush Torture bill passed so easily this week in the GOP controlled Congress.

Our Nation's reputation as a civilized country now lays in shreds with blood and semen on the hands of the GOP in both the White House and Congress. Foley was put in charge of child abuse legislation in the House, when Hassert knew for over a year what was going on?

The 24/7 media divas will be salivating over this like mad dogs for the next few weeks giving the Undecided and Soccer Moms plenty to think about as the election approaches.

Will the Christian Right try to sweep this under the rug? Is this what our troops are fighting for in Iraq? Weren't all those poor children neglected by FEMA after Katrina bad enough?

Are America's moral majority going to continue to allow GOP pedifiles and their GOP leadership protectors to run wild in the Halls of Congress?

These and other searching questions will be asked by alarmed media divas like Oprah, Katie Couric, and Tucker Carlson in the coming weeks. There isn't going to be any clever slogans or catchy Karen Hughs publicity phrases to hide behind on this one.

Does Osama Bin Lauden look so frightening, when we have compassionate conservatives like Foley secretly approaching our kids on the internet in the cloak rooms of Congresss?

Just how much lower can these Republicans and their appologists sink?

This is John Laesch, the Democratic candidate running against Dennis Hastert.

Our campaign office reports that the phone has not stopped ringing all day and the Inbox on our e-mail account is exploding.

We know that Dennis Hastert has been the "cover-up" guy for everything that is wrong in Washington. Hastert has been cleaning up messes all the way from this Wednesday's "get out of jail free" detainee bill that he gave to George Bush to gutting house ethics rules after Tom DeLay was indicted.

I am currently working with Danny Stover who is running against Shimkus in Illinois' 19th District to hold a near-term press conference. If you want to help Danny Stover get a $400 plane ticket to Chicago, you can donate here

It is time for both of these gentlemen to do the right thing for America and resign.
John Laesch's diary :: ::

This morning we held a press conference in St. Charles, IL and I basically said that it is time for Dennis Hastert to resign. If he does not do the honorable thing then voters should fire him on Nov. 7th.

I started my speech with some of Hastert's own words from a 1998 press conference.

"Even though our children may be at home with the doors locked,"

"that doesn't mean that they are safe. We must continue to be proactive in warding off pedophiles and other creeps who want to take advantage of our children...It's not infringing on liberties, it's about protecting our kids."

Apparently proactive in Washington means waiting 11 months...

Exactly one month ago today Dennis Hastert made the front page of the Kane County Chronicle, a local paper, that covered Dennis Hastert's town hall forum on Internet safety.

Protecting children is OK for Dennis Hastert when it is earning him votes, but he doesn't give a damn when it is a page working on Capital Hill.

The fact that Hastert tried to cover this up is reason enough for him to resign.

The fact that Hastert is playing dumb means that he does not plan to go quietly into the night.

I am going to be reading all of the posts from Kossacks tonight and I cannot sit around too much longer. Please continue to offer advice and vote in our poll.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/9/30/212758/946

Well I've read one of the chats that Foley was involved in and it's rather disgusting.

You know if he were a Dem they'd have already gave him the lethal injection.

Well I've read one of the chats that Foley was involved in and it's rather disgusting.

****

Indeed it was! I wouldn't even post a link to it.

Hastert, Alexander, Reynolds should all resign now.

Posted by rjsnj on September 30, 2006 at 10:19 PM

rjsnj, notice how polite Reich offers up his critism? What in the world is wrong with Democrats? Can't they get excited and angry about anything? If we "lost our tempers" more often, voters might actually begin to think we might do something if they voted for us.

Well over on the CBS News blog more people were posting about how they understood why Clinton got angry and they didn't see it as a tantrum.

I'm tired of this President who smirks and slouches over the podium as he talks to his subjects.

I'm also tired of these reporters (least ways that's what they considered theirselves to be) who are actually corporate servants.

Just how much lower can these Republicans and their appologists sink?

Posted by SandyH on September 30, 2006 at 10:26 PM

I'm praying not much. But watch out for home-grown McVeigh types to be flushed out of the woodwork and forests by this constitution trashing bill.

Bring some troops home for marshal law protections?

John i hope you'll do your best and defeat Mr Magoo in the upcoming election and you becoming the new majority leader in the house. Go John.

Good evening to everyone!!!

Wow, a lot of good posting happening here tonight!!
rjsnj, I'd slap you a high-five, but not sure how to do that over the internet. I can feel the heat on this cold night. Keep it burning!!!:)

In my opinion, legalizing kidnapping and torture by our government, with no legal recourse, is the third most shameful thing the USA has done.

The other two are: fire and atom bombing cities of civilians in WWII.
And:

No group of people faced more prejudice and discrimination than California's native people. In the onslaught of the Gold Rush and the American settlement, which followed, many Indian tribes were forced from their ancestral lands. The natural resources they depended upon for food and shelter were destroyed. Laws were enacted that prevented them from voting, owning property or weapons of any kind, serving on a jury, or testifying in a court of law. Eventually there were bounties placed on their heads, and legally-sanctioned massacres of defenseless villages. The editor of the San Francisco Bulletin spoke for most white Americans: It is a painful necessity of advancing civilization that the Indians should gradually disappear.

Ultimately, there was an organized campaign that was explicitly designed to hunt and kill Indians, with bounties placed on their heads. The expenses of these paramilitary efforts were covered by the federal government and by the sale of state bonds. By 1866, newspaper articles endorsed the action. The Chico Courant proclaimed: It has become a question of extermination now. It is a mercy to the red devils to exterminate them. Treaties are played out. There is only one kind of treaty that is effective - cold lead. California's Indians very nearly did disappear. By 1900, their population had been reduced from 300,000 to only 16,000.
http://www.museumca.org/goldrush/fever16-di.html

peace

this election stuff is getting to feel like being on that runaway train with john voigt and eric roberts. hoping for a different ending this time of course.

Dear Democrats:

If you fail to make the Foley fallout part of a broader narrative about how it is just another example of the way the GOP conducts business, you are fools.

Think of the many many examples of warnings or information that was ignored, led to disastrous consequences, then was covered up or the blame pointed elsewhere by the GOP. 9/11. Failure to warn about or protect workers from toxins at WTC site. Failure to send enough troops to Afghanistan to catch bin Laden/secure the country from the Taliban. Failure to listen to generals regarding troop levels needed for occupation of Iraq. Failure to plan for occupation, or even read plans previously prepared. Failure to prepare for Katrina.

This is the way the GOP operates. That's your narrative. Don't miss the opportunity to slip that in, now that you finally have the media's attention because there's a salacious sex angle. Don't let it become just a "sex" story or the media will start equivocating and bringing up Monica Lewinsky. Don't listen to the pundits or consultants who advise you to avoid the story because the GOP and media will try to make it about Monica. Pre-empt them, and make it about the GOP pattern of ignoring, covering up, and shifting blame. Stay on topic. This is about the party of the Underpants Gnomes, whose every scheme seems to follow this script: 1) Ignore warnings, information, or good advice....3) SUCCESS!!!

If you want to make it about anything else, make it about this: A party that would ignore or cover up the actions of a sexual predator they know is targeting minors, just to protect and hold onto political power, is not a party that can be trusted on ANY issue.

Can a party that can't be trusted to protect your kids from someone they suspect to be a sexual predator be trusted - really - to protect you from terrorists? How can a party that consistently ignores warnings protect anyone from anything?

There is a lot of hay to be made here. Don't blow your chances.

Even though our children may be at home with the doors locked,"
"that doesn't mean that they are safe. We must continue to be proactive in warding off pedophiles and other creeps who want to take advantage of our children...It's not infringing on liberties, it's about protecting our kids."
---------------

It seems as though the pedophile republicans are the ones enjoying their freedom, while we're behind our locked doors with our children. It's past time that this situation got turned around. We, and our children, should be enjoying our freedom, while the republican pedophiles are behind the locked doors.

mal, as i drove past some farms around here i saw a number of democratic congresstional candidates out in the fields pitchforking accusations like hay onto the wagon and singing zip da dee doo dah zip da dee dah...

You're invited to the liveblog tomorrow morning for the Meet the Press Debate between Sherrod Brown and Mike Dewine.

www.debatescoop.org is launching with expert coverage in a blogger-friendly scoop software environment. Previews are up now.

Register there to comment and write diaries. Check out the "About Us" page.

We are the one and only site collecting the nation's expertise on political debates, but the expert opinions are worth little without your questions and comments.

gregg - yeah, well, Timmy Russert and the rest of the Sunday morning gang hasn't had a chance yet to try to warn them about how they will make it All About Monica if Democrats don't play nice and forget about it. Just tune in tomorrow and see if you don't hear variations on that theme being played far and wide.

My point was, anyone who pays any attention to them is a fool. Obviously not all Republicans are pedophiles; that sounds like a lame argument a Republican would make, kind of like claiming that covering up a consensual sexual affair constitutes a "high crime". No one but the loony 30% buy into those kind of blanket statements, though the media is all too willing to repeat them ad infinitum. And that's where the issue ends unless there's a clear narrative to cast it as an example of a much larger pattern. So the opportunity to make it about the pattern of incompetence, inaction, and poor judgement shouldn't be missed.

thanks for the quality info demondeac.

malcontent on September 30, 2006 at 11:22 PM:

Right on the mark! Frustration is a terrible thing that sometimes leads to improper classification. Thanks for setting the issue straight.

Republican Cut and Run

Cut taxes for the rich
run up the deficits for children

meanwhile back in the reality based community the plot thickens...back biting and in fighting, man it was real exciting!

GOP Leader Rebuts Hastert on Foley
Reynolds: Speaker Knew of E-Mails in Spring

By Jonathan Weisman and Charles Babington
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, October 1, 2006; Page A01

House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) was notified early this year of inappropriate e-mails from former representative Mark Foley (R-Fla.) to a 16-year-old page, a top GOP House member said yesterday -- contradicting the speaker's assertions that he learned of concerns about Foley only last week.

Hastert did not dispute the claims of Rep. Thomas M. Reynolds (R-N.Y.), and his office confirmed that some of Hastert's top aides knew last year that Foley had been ordered to cease contact with the boy and to treat all pages respectfully.

Reynolds, chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, became the second senior House Republican to say that Hastert has known of Foley's contacts for months, prompting Democratic attacks about the GOP leadership's inaction. Foley abruptly resigned his seat Friday.

House Majority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) told The Washington Post on Friday that he had learned in late spring of inappropriate e-mails Foley sent to the page, a boy from Louisiana, and that he promptly told Hastert, who appeared to know already of the concerns. Hours later, Boehner contacted The Post to say he could not be sure he had spoken with Hastert.

Yesterday's developments revealed a rift at the highest echelons of House Republican ranks a month before the Nov. 7 elections, and they threatened to expand the scandal to a full-blown party dilemma.

Only after Reynolds's definitive statement did Hastert concede yesterday that he may have been notified of some of the questionable activities of Foley, 52, who had co-chaired the Congressional Missing and Exploited Children's Caucus. Hastert said, however, that he knew nothing of the sexually explicit instant messages that became public Friday when ABC News and other news outlets reported them. The messages apparently were exchanged with youths other than the 16-year-old.

Hastert's aides learned in the fall of 2005 only of e-mail exchanges that House officials eventually deemed "over-friendly" with the Louisiana teenager, the speaker's office said yesterday in a lengthy statement. "While the Speaker does not explicitly recall this conversation" with Reynolds, the statement said, "he has no reason to dispute Congressman Reynolds's recollection that he reported to him on the problem and its resolution."

Boehner and Reynolds said their offices learned of the Foley e-mails months ago from Rep. Rodney Alexander (R), who sponsored the page from his northeastern-Louisiana district.

"Rodney Alexander brought to my attention the existence of the e-mails between Mark Foley and a former page of Mr. Alexander's," Reynolds said yesterday. "Despite the fact that I had not seen the e-mails in question, and Mr. Alexander told me that the parents didn't want the matter pursued, I told the speaker of the conversation Mr. Alexander had with me."

GOP leaders have said they referred the matter promptly to Rep. John M. Shimkus (R-Ill.), who heads a three-lawmaker panel that oversees the House page program.

Shimkus questioned Foley, but at that time, he had seen only suspiciously friendly e-mails, not the explicit instant messages revealed recently. In one e-mail to the former page, for example, Foley asked for a picture of him. The boy reportedly told an associate that he considered the request to be "sick," but Foley convinced Shimkus that the exchanges were innocent, Shimkus and Republican leaders said.

Republicans appeared to have kept the matter under wraps. Rep. Dale E. Kildee (Mich.), the only Democrat on the House Page Board, said yesterday: "I was never informed of the allegations about Mr. Foley's inappropriate communications with a House page, and I was never involved in any inquiry into this matter."

Rep. Rahm Emanuel (Ill.), chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, questioned yesterday why Alexander had gone to the House Republicans' chief political operative, rather than to other party leaders. "That's to protect a member, not to protect a child," Emanuel said.

With his statement, Reynolds, who is locked in a difficult reelection campaign, signaled he was unwilling to take the fall alone amid partisan attacks that were becoming increasingly vituperative. The Democratic National Committee yesterday issued a statement asking "Why Did Tom Reynolds Cover Up Congressman's Sex Crimes?" It continued: "While the shocking [online] exchanges produced an immediate uproar that cost Congressman Foley his job, at least one member of the House Republican leadership had known about the situation for months and did nothing about it: . . . Reynolds."

Foley Built Career as Protector of Children
The Republican congressman who resigned Friday following the discovery of sexually explicit Internet messages he sent to teenage boys was a gregarious and charismatic lawmaker who built his political career in large measure on legislative proposals meant to halt the sexual predation of children and...

Republican insiders said Reynolds spoke out because he was angry that Hastert appeared willing to let him take the blame for the party leadership's silence.

A House GOP leadership aide, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of losing his job, said that Reynolds realizes he has taken a shot at his leader but that it is understandable.

"This is what happens when one member tries to throw another member under a bus," the aide said.

Last night, Hastert, Boehner and Majority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) said in a statement that Foley's communications with former pages are "unacceptable and abhorrent," and that his resignation "must now be followed by the full weight of the criminal justice system." The statement did not suggest how that might happen, but added that the three have "asked for the creation of a toll-free telephone number for House pages, parents, grandparents and staff to confidentially report incidents of concern."

The House clerk's office "has taken possession of Congressman Foley's office, and Capitol police officers have been posted in front of his office around-the-clock" to preserve Foley's records and correspondence, said Hastert spokesman Ron Bonjean.

Foley's actions have jeopardized a House seat that Republicans had considered safe this fall. Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) headlined a fundraiser yesterday for the district's Democratic nominee, Tim Mahoney, whose race has rocketed to national prominence with Foley's resignation. Charlie Cook, editor of a nonpartisan newsletter that tracks congressional races, said that if Foley's name stays on the ballot, "it's going to be hard for Republicans to hold on to the seat." But a GOP loss might last only two years, he said, since the district typically votes Republican in presidential races.

The chronology released by Hastert's office begins in late 2005, after Alexander had alerted colleagues of Foley's e-mail exchanges with the former page, who had returned to Louisiana. Hastert aide Tim Kennedy "immediately discussed the matter with his supervisor, Mike Stokke, Speaker Hastert's Deputy Chief of Staff," the statement says. Also brought into the talks were Hastert's staff attorney, Ted Van Der Meid, and the House clerk.

The clerk and Shimkus "immediately met with Foley to discuss the matter," the chronology says, and they told Foley "to immediately cease any communication with the young man. . . . Mindful of the sensitivity to the parents' wishes to protect their child's privacy and believing that they had promptly reported what they knew to the proper authorities," it says, "Kennedy, Van Der Meid and Stokke did not discuss the matter with others in the Speaker's Office."

Republicans fear the scandal, coming in the wake of indictments of three GOP congressmen this year, might add to the public's unrest at the party's image and conduct, and some House members yesterday joined in the chorus of dismay and scorn.

"I don't think it will be just conservative voters that will shake their heads when they hear about this," said Rep. Jim McCrery (R-La.).

"As the author of laws designed to protect children on the Internet, I was appalled at the recent revelations that a member of Congress engaged in reprehensible behavior toward young people connected to the congressional page program," said Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.). "Congress should thoroughly investigate this matter and, in cooperation with law enforcement authorities, support all proper legal action."

Rich Galen, a Republican political strategist, worried that voters might lump Foley's name with former representatives Robert W. Ney (R-Ohio), Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) and Randy "Duke" Cunningham (R-Calif.), all of whom were forced to resign or were indicted amid various scandals this year.

"This sense of entitlement that members of Congress can do anything to anyone or for anyone has got to end," Galen said.

Staff writer R. Jeffrey Smith and staff researcher Magda Jean-Louis contributed to this report.

TomN,

The way affairs are running in the Beltway, I think the McVeighs will be going after the the GOP pedifiles instead of liberal Democrats. What did those immates do to a convicted pedifile this week....tatoo his victim's name on his forehead?

How about tatooing "Abu Graibe" or "Katrina" on Bush's forehead? On the head of every GOP Congressional incumbent?

Does anyone think our troops would want to fight their countrymen back here at home, when they're so lucky to be fighting the terrorists over there? Has Rumsfeld given them the resources to do either?

It's time the citizens of this nation stood up and took responsibility for voting this crowd of GOP degenerates out of power.

We have a GOP President and Vice President who have ignored the laws of the land whenever they chose, while they emptyied the national Treasury for war profiteering and tax cuts for their rich benefactors. Gee, aren't they real patriots?

Then we have a GOP Majority leader who had to resign and is on trial for at least two offenses with more indictments on the way.

We have a GOP Senate Majority Leader who is under investigation for insider trading.

We have a former GOP House committee chairman in jail for taking bribes and a whole bunch more forced to resign as they are indicted or put under investigation in the Abramoff grand juries.

All these "honorable men" and their rubber stamp GOP coharts are so fond of reminding us of their moral leadership? Oh, yeah, they're keeping our children safe. Democrats could never protect them in the way they have.

What was Hassert waiting for?

Spare us from their 9/11 terrorist scare talk, we have more things to worry about from the Grand Olde Party. Do you know where your GOP congressmen are tonight and whether they are approaching your child with some pretty ugly suggestions?

No wonder they've been helping the drug industry legalize all kinds of sex enhancement drugs and allowing date rape drugs to be mass produced. Now it all falls into place.

Sorry I've bitched so much tonight. I'm cutting out, too, before the trolls come in and tell us it's all Clinton's fault that Foley acted on his impulses.

Tomorrow should be a talking head's dream: Legalized Presidential torture and Congressional pedifilia. Can't wait to see how Russert and the rest of the media whores handle it. Will they even mention that things are going so well in Iraq that marshall law had to be imposed over the weekend?

I feel sorry for the silent majority. They got exactly what they most feared. Will they have the courage to confront their abusers this election and send them where they belong? Throw the bums out.

Good night.

SandyH, Goodnight!!

I, too, am out to bed. You know, I think my mind is successfully blown. I try to rationalize this weeks events and cannot come up with anything except, sick,sick,sick.

Our democracy sinks into despotism, and the leaders find ways to improve upon their own personal modus vivendi. I just do not know what to make of it anymore!:\

All have a good night.

Malcontent,
I think you have the ball on this one, and it is the one in which we all should carry.

Please pass this along to your Democratic friends.

**

5 Steps for Taking Back Our Country

1) Keep it simple. Paint the issues with wide, bold strokes. Nuance is important when dealing with foreign interests, but not when describing situations to your constituents. One of the reasons the GOP has been so successful the past 2 decades has been because they aren’t afraid to generalize, boiling down their point of view to simple, easily-repeatable soundbites.

2) Be aggressive. Go on the offensive and do not back down. Your well-funded opponent won’t concede – why should you? One of the reasons long-time Democratic voters are frustrated with Democratic candidates is that they give up too easy. Both Kerry and Gore conceded when they should have fought back harder and earlier to win the minds of all Americans. Nobody likes a sucker who’s afraid to defend himself. Stop bringing a knife to a gunfight, and get serious about winning. If you act like a winner and don't admit defeat, you'll encourage others to back you up.

3) Frame the debate. I’ve watched us lose control of the South the past 20 years because we’ve allowed the religious right to define the terms of the argument. This must stop. Make your opponent respond to your terms, rather than you responding to his.

4) Be prepared. Your opponent is going to make up stuff about you that is not true or is unfair, and he’ll dig through your statements and actions to find a way to paint you as a tax-and-spend liberal who is soft on crime, drugs, illegal aliens and terrorists. Make sure you have developed a series of easily-remembered and glib responses to these false accusations, then turn around and paint him as a member of a do-nothing congress who failed to capture Bin Laden, dug a $500 Billion debt for a war in Iraq on false pretenses, who squandered our largest national surplus ever under Clinton by giving handouts to the wealthy, the oil companies, the polluters who are increasing global warming, all while causing the greatest increase in unemployment and housing foreclosures since the Great Depression.

5) Hold your moral convictions high and bright for all to see. Be honest in what you do and what you say. Stand up for yourself as well as for the little guy – that’s the great Democratic way. Don’t follow that worn-out habit of trying to be a bigger person by ignoring all the bad things your opponent says about you. Stop being a pansy, and forthrightly accuse your attackers of hurting America, making us less safe, and yes, even endangering Democracy itself by going against your ideas which are better, smarter, and stronger for making us all safer.

Posted by TexasLane on September 30, 2006 at 11:52 PM Republicans Cut and Run - Cut taxes for the rich - run up deficits for our children

excellent.

The Foley Scandal

It's not just about Rep. Foley.

THE SUDDEN resignation of Rep. Mark Foley (R-Fla.) involves more than an obviously troubled man who sent sexually suggestive e-mails to underage congressional pages. Numerous fellow lawmakers, including Republican leaders, apparently had at least partial knowledge about Mr. Foley's disturbing conduct.

RobertFrosty on October 1, 2006 at 12:38 AM,

You cannot compare Foley with a fairy. Your word choice is disconcerting. Pedophiles are criminals. I presume your word choice is reference to the gay community. Their currently is no legal restriction of being gay. Unless, of course, one desires to be married, but that is not the topic of the discourse concerning Rep. Foley. I sincerely hope, if you have kids, they never meet up with the likes of Rep. Foley. Stangely and sorrowfully enough our world it seems is being overrun by these pedophiles. For one to be in the halls of congress is a disgrace.

That is all I can make of this travesty at the present time. Politics be damned!!

House Republican leaders admit they knew about Foley e-mails for months

The House voted late Friday to turn the matter over to the Ethics Committee before Congress adjourned for the fall election campaign season, hours after House leaders acknowledged they had known about the e-mails for months.

....

In the post World War II era, Democrats controlled the House for four decades before losing it in the momentous 1994 election, which brought Foley into office along with 53 other Republican freshmen.

Once an embodiment of the "Republican Revolution," Foley in this year's elections has added to his party's woes.

SandyH,

thanks for the eloquent indignation. I do feel like some democrats have tatooed "shame" on their own foreheads, and by more than my imagination on mine.

Vote all the bums out. Bring back honor and self-respect to America.

Totally tired,

The Foley Coverup Timeline

2003 — Rep. Mark Foley (R-FL) has sexually explicit IM exchanges with an underage boy who worked as a Congressional page.

SEPTEMBER 2005 — Rep. Rodney Alexander (R-LA), who sponsored the page, learns “of the e-mails from a reporter.”

FALL 2005 — “Tim Kennedy, a staff assistant in the [Speaker J. Denis Hastert’s] Office, received a telephone call from Congressman Rodney Alexander’s Chief of Staff who indicated that he had an email exchange between Congressman Foley and a former House page…[Mike] Stokke [Deputy Chief of Staff for Speaker Hastert] called the Clerk and asked him to come to the Speaker’s Office so that he could put him together with Congressman Alexander’s Chief of Staff.”

....

The GOP has made applying the death penalty to child molesters a center piece of their election strategy widening the scope of the death penalty beyond murder.

Death Penalty Being Invoked Against Child Molesters

NEW YORK (Special to the NNPA from IPS/GIN) - Politicians in primarily southern U.S. states have passed laws that expand the use of the death penalty to include repeat child sex offenders-a move mental health professionals say is ineffective in stopping molestation and abolitionists believe ultimately will be ruled unconstitutional.

Iraqi Journalists Add Laws to List of Dangers
By Paul von Zielbauer
Iraqi Journalists Slaughtered Suppressed for Speaking Against Government

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092906D.shtml

Letter From Ned Lamont to Sen. Lieberman: National Intelligence Estimate Finds the War in Iraq Has Made Us Less Safe:

http://nedlamont.com/news/1540

Diane Farrell (D) for Congress. Read the endorsements Diane has recieved:

http://www.farrellforcongress.com/endorsements/index.html

What Others Are Saying about John DeStefano (D)
Learn why he is the right choice for CT:

http://www.destefanoforct.com/content.jsp?content_KEY=1442