Local

Culture of Corruption, Hangover Edition

Posted by on February 15, 2007 at 03:03 PM

I bet you thought that the corruption files had been closed. After all, we did get rid of the do-nothing rubberstamp Republican Congress. Well, it would seem these things linger, like a hangover, and are still around the next day.

Take Nevada Governor, Republican Jim Gibbons:

Federal prosecutors are investigating whether Nevada Gov. Jim Gibbons accepted unreported gifts or payments from a company that was awarded secret military contracts when Mr. Gibbons served in Congress.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is examining whether any gifts or payments violated federal contracting rules or were offered in exchange for official acts by Mr. Gibbons, people briefed on the investigation said. Mr. Gibbons, a Republican, represented Nevada for five terms in Congress, where he served on the House Intelligence and Armed Services committees, and was sworn in as governor last month.

The close ties between the congressman and the contractor, Warren Trepp, were disclosed in a Nov. 1 Wall Street Journal article, which revealed that Mr. Gibbons accepted private jet flights and a Caribbean cruise from the software-company owner. Mr. Gibbons says accepting the cruise and flight didn’t violate House ethics rules.

New evidence has emerged that includes emails to Mr. Trepp — the majority owner of eTreppid Technologies LLC and the former chief trader for convicted junk-bond dealer Michael Milken — discussing a payment or gift to then-Rep. Gibbons. They also show Mr. Gibbons repeatedly using his congressional office to help the firm seek classified military and civilian contracts.

The emails show that since at least 2003, Mr. Trepp maintained close ties to Mr. Gibbons, who helped eTreppid get no-bid software contracts from the Air Force, U.S. Special Operations Command and Central Intelligence Agency. Messrs. Trepp and Gibbons have denied any wrongdoing, and no charges have been filed; indeed, such investigations sometimes end without official action.

On March 22, 2005, days before Mr. Trepp and his wife embarked on the Caribbean cruise with the congressman and his family, Jalé Trepp sent a reminder to her husband. “Please don’t forget to bring the money you promised Jim and Dawn,” referring to Mr. and Mrs. Gibbons. Minutes later, Mr. Trepp responds, “Don’t you ever send this kind of message to me! Erase this message from your computer right now!” Mr. Gibbons failed to disclose the cruise and travel on Mr. Trepp’s leased private jet, as required by House ethics rules. He later asked the House Ethics Committee for an exemption, but left office before any action was taken.

(Emphasis added)

This is the second major story the Wall Street Journal has published raising questions about whether Gov. Gibbons used his position in Congress to help a contributor secure contracts.

Gibbons has been in office just less than two months, but already he has embarrassed the state with a bizarre midnight swearing-in, little understanding of his own budget, a baffling energy program and an investigation into whether his top campaign advisor tried to pressure a woman into dropping assault charges against Gibbons. The string of gaffes has earned him the nickname among some bloggers as "the nation's worst governor."

There is some good news in the story, if not for Jim Gibbons, at least for the American people:

The FBI declined to comment on the investigation, which appears to be in a preliminary stage. The bureau has stepped up its pursuit of public-corruption cases, and says it now has about 620 agents working on federal, state and local cases, compared with 260 in 2002.

As we said post-election 2006, RIP Culture of Corruption.

Comments (6) «

I guess Tracy Gibbons forgot to include the NY Times article about BOTH reps and dems finding work arounds to new ethics rules.

Did you note how Sen Clinton was conveniently endorsed by a key black leader after giving him a 10K per month retainer to do "consulting work" for her through the campaign season? You just can't find that kind of news on this site. Hmmmmm

1
independent4life on February 15, 2007 at 10:56 PM

Since when did no bid contracts become the rule? Before Bush took office I never heard of such a thing.

Hmmm....we are talking about Air Force contracts and our national security. Why do you nitwits persist in getting military scandals mixed up with political ones?

That's right. It's because that's the way you Republicans do business. It's all about politics.

2
SandyH on February 16, 2007 at 12:18 AM

What ever happened to the guy that exposed Bernie Kerik for the monster that he is? I think the country owes this guy a thank you for not letting Rudy put a guy like that in homeland security? How could Rudy have put a guy with no high school diploma in a position of authority in the jail system, and let him go into the Police Commissioner spot and then set him up for homeland security? What a Joke!!!! Something really stinks here!! What could Kerik possibly have on Rudy or even the president that nothing happens to this dirt bag? There has to be more!!! There Has to Be More!!!

It's obvious that Kerik and Rudy didn't want this guy Ray talking. What Happened to him? As soon as he exposed him, no one ever heard from him again. Is he even alive? What does Kerik have on Rudy that he would continue to let him get away with these atrocities? What does this guy Ray know that would make them react in this way? Obviously it's not in Rudy's or Kerik's best interest to have him talking. Ray was Kerik's best man at his wedding, he must have known something more that they did not want exposed. What would have happened if this loser Kerik slithered his way into the White House? What irreversible damage could have been done if not for the Patriotic bravery of Ray? This guy Ray did a huge service to this country exposing this monster for what he is. It's pretty obvious that Rudy is the brains of this operation and Kerik is the brawn in this politically corrupt scandal.

What has happened to America that when someone does the right thing that they should have fear for their safety, or even their family's safety? Is this the message that we should be sending that when someone does the right thing they might disappear without a trace? What happened to this guy Larry Ray? Did Kerik or some other corrupt official get rid of him for doing the right thing?

I think this should be the new theme for all Americans. "DO THE RIGHT THING". We need to embrace all people who do the right thing!!! I thank god that this guy Ray didn't think only of himself when he exposed that dirt bag for what he really is. He knew how powerful this monster was, and he did what was right anyway. Why do you think Kerik got kicked out of Saudi Arabia? It was for framing people that his bosses told him to frame.He got a couple of doctors thrown out of there strictly by framing them. This guy has no moral compass and obviously Rudy's not far ahead of him.

I hope that with Rudy making a run for the White House that people take notice of what his track record has been in his dealings with Kerik. More than likely, Kerik is not the only morally insufficient criminal that Rudy's got his hands dirty with.

3
sickened on February 18, 2007 at 01:23 AM

So how stupid is Nevada that it is going to turn its primary over to Fox News? Yeah, they are going to treat you Dems just swell. Apparently, the only place dumber than Nevada is Connecticut. You give your debate and primary to Rupert Murdock and Fox, and they send Republican Joe to DC in a Dem seat. This is the stupidity that makes you lose elections. I just wish we had a third party or a parliamentary system.

4
Oakland on February 21, 2007 at 03:03 PM

I do not believe the Democratic Party is serious about bringing meaningful and lasting change in ethics violations within Congress.

The minimal changes on gifts, disclosure and transparency are all smoke and mirrors, to what everyone agrees is really needed - the promised independent Office of Public Integrity.

Speaker Pelosi and the Democratic Party have been given an opportunity by middle class Independents (like myself) that believe in ethics and fiscal discipline within the Federal government.

The Party and Congress (whats new) appear to no longer embrace a bipartisan office that will provide much needed oversight, accountability and consequences/punsishment to members of Congress that have broken the trust of the American public and taxpayer.

Power, legislation and our treasury will continue to corrupt our Congressional process and its members. 30,000 Lobbyists are "banking" on the Democratic Party to fail on their promise of the Office of Public Integrity.

All Federal Agencies have an Inpector General, and even the White House has an Office of Public Integrity.

I believe only Rep. Meehan D-MA, Rep. Shays R-CT, and Rep. Wilson R-NM, have endorsed H.R. 422 - the reintroduction of the creation of a Independent Office of Public Integrity.

Also, where is the outrage to the House Ethics investigation(coverup) of the Mark Foley
R-FL "don't ask, don't tell" predator club of our adolescent Pages. I do not believe anyone received any punishment or even admonishment, and Foley was allowed to retire on a comfortable retirement at taxpayers expense.

What about Rep. Jeffords (D-LA) who had $90,000 in his freezer; again where is the public (Party) outrage and accountability?

Until Speaker Pelosi goes public and endores legislation for this minimal cost office, Independents and others like myself will never trust Congress or "the new an improved Democratic Party of 2006".

Anyone can talk the the talk; is this Party any different? Voters have given the Democratic leadership the opportunity to do what is right and we demand a vote - even if it becomes non-binding as with the Iraq troop surge.

There will be consequences for all that do not support this much needed legislation and office.

We will not forget in 2008.

5
harborman on February 22, 2007 at 02:32 PM

Published on Friday, February 23, 2007 by the San Francisco Chronicle

Dems in Uproar over Fox Plan to Cover Debate
by Joe Garofoli

The first presidential primary is 11 months away, but liberals are arguing among themselves over how to best reach new voters -- and whether to cooperate with one of their biggest media nemeses. Their dilemma:

Should we Fox?

"Fox," as in partner with the Fox News Channel. Liberal bloggers and the online political powerhouse MoveOn.org launched a campaign Thursday to persuade the Nevada Democratic Party to boot Fox News as the broadcaster of the state's August Democratic presidential debate.

The reason, according to an online letter MoveOn sent to 2 million of its members Thursday, is that "Fox is a mouthpiece for the Republican Party, not a legitimate news channel. The Democratic Party of Nevada should drop Fox as its partner for the presidential primary debate." Joining the chorus Thursday was liberal filmmaker Robert Greenwald, the director of the anti-Fox film, "Outfoxed," who released a video online of Fox's coverage of Democratic candidates.

But the Nevada party organizers -- and Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean -- said Thursday that while they may not think much of Fox's reporting, they want to reach out to viewers of the largest cable news network, one with double the number of prime-time viewers of CNN. And one whose believability is much higher with Republicans than Democrats, according to a 2005 study by the Project for Excellence in Journalism.

So why not reach out, party officials say? At a time when President Bush's approval rating hovers around 30 percent, there may be disgruntled conservative voters to be found there. The network has broadcast Democratic debates before, and is close to announcing a second debate it will air in the next week.

And Fox's reaction to this controversy? They're content to watch liberals fight from a distance, and network officials hope that the buzz will send more viewers to their debate broadcast. Presidential debates ordinarily double their audience, and this quarrel could pad that number with those curious about Fox.

Already, MoveOn has accused Fox of trying to skew the election through its misleading reporting on Democratic candidates, particularly Sens. Barack Obama, D-Ill., and Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y.

Last month, Fox reported -- and later backed off its report -- that Obama attended a radical Muslim school in Indonesia as a child. It was widely debunked by other media outlets, including CNN.

In a Feb. 5 appearance on the Fox News program, "Hannity and Colmes," Fox News commentator Dick Morris said Clinton and former President Bill Clinton were behind the smear. But when pressed by co-host Alan Colmes for what evidence he had, Morris said, "No, I just -- obviously they were." And some of the network's hosts have mocked Obama's middle name, "Hussein."

Bloggers like Matt Stoller of mydd.com are more worried about what the network's post-debate spin could be. When Fox broadcast a Democratic candidate debate in September 2003, Stoller noted that the network's post-debate story was headlined, "Democratic Candidates Offer Grim View of America." It cut away early from the show, Stoller said, giving conservative pundit William Bennett first crack at post-debate analysis.

"This is part of an ongoing struggle to convince Democrats and journalists to stop taking Fox News seriously as a credible news outlet," Stoller wrote in an e-mail this week to supporters and others. "It's also part of a tug of war with the media and within the Democratic Party itself, one that will continue to play out over the course of the 2008 campaign."

For now, the Democratic Party's leaders are ready to work with Fox even if they get burned by the network that uses the tagline "fair and balanced" for its coverage. The lead player is Dean, who was elected as party chair on a strategy to appeal to voters in all states, a strategy that was supported by many liberal bloggers.

"This is about talking to voters, not a network," Dean said Thursday. "While the Fox News Channel rarely has coverage that is fair and balanced, we believe that Fox viewers, who are potential voters, should have the opportunity to see a debate between our candidates. These forums provide an important unfiltered opportunity for potential voters to see Democrats without the bias of the network."

MoveOn organizer Adam Green told The Chronicle in an e-mail: "Everybody supports reaching out to new people. Fox is giving Democrats one day of news coverages specifically to have legitimacy while smearing Democrats the other 364 days this year." Green noted that 75 percent of the 10,000 MoveOn members in Nevada said the party shouldn't be partnering with Fox.

Nevada Democratic Party spokeswoman Kirsten Searer sought to tamp down concerns about Fox's influence on the broadcast. Each major decision about the debate, Searer said, "from the background on the stage to the debate moderator, will be reached by mutual agreement of the state party, Western Majority Project (a coalition of western Democratic politicians) and Fox News.

"A 50-state strategy means talking to every American. The debate in August is not an endorsement of Fox. Instead, it is an effort to reach out to Fox viewers. We will not win elections if we don't win over new people."

Fox News is treating this as an issue for Democrats to work out among themselves. Marty Ryan, Fox's executive producer of political programming, shrugged off complaints about the network's coverage cited in Thursday's campaign.

"That's the great thing about America. You're free to have those opinions," Ryan said. "Besides, they're probably drawing more attention to our coverage of the debate."

Jane Fleming, executive director of Young Democrats of America, appears as a guest on Fox News two or three times a week, often as the lone liberal tangling with some of Fox's conservative personalities. She doesn't support, as some have advocated, freezing out the network -- refusing to appear on-air as a liberal counterpoint.

"The thing is, if we don't appear, there are plenty of Democrats Fox will find who aren't really Democrats -- they're just people who will agree with the host all the time," Fleming said. "We need to be on there pushing back."

6
_MarthaA on February 24, 2007 at 08:30 PM


« Hide Comments

Comments are now closed for this entry.