header_blog.jpg

Photo IDs and the Election

Posted by Michael Link on January 9, 2008 at 04:25 PM

Today the Supreme Court heard arguments on Indiana's voter ID law. Because the folks at SCOTUS Blog have a background in this stuff, I'll let them summarize:

At issue in the consolidated cases of Crawford v. Marion County Election Board (07-21) and Indiana Democratic Party v. Rokita (07-25) is the constitutionality of a 2005 Indiana law that voters who show up at the polls without a photo ID will be allowed only to cast a provisional ballot, to be validated later at another place only if they can travel there and then prove identity.

There's been a big problem across the country with Republican attempts at suppressing the vote. But why do they claim to support it? To combat "voter fraud" -- but there's never been a report of voter impersonation fraud in Indiana.

We can, however, point to people disenfranchised at the polls because of this law. It's undemocratic.

We'll see what happens. But we're not just sitting back, we've launched an unprecedented voter protection effort make sure your vote is counted.

Comments - 9 »

Comments are now closed for this entry.