header_blog.jpg

Democratic Party Files Complaint Against McCain for Ignoring FEC Law

Posted by Michael Link on February 25, 2008 at 11:42 AM

Today we're filing a complaint with the FEC against John McCain's campaign. In the complaint, we ask them to investigate whether the McCain campaign is about to violate the spending limit law he agreed to when he became eligible to receive matching funds.

I've embedded the document below, or you can download here.

Read this doc on Scribd: DNC McCain FEC Complaint

We've heard a lot recently about Senator McCain's lack of ethics. Maybe it has to do with having a campaign that's run so heavily by Washington lobbyists, but it has now extended beyond his Senate conduct and into his campaign.

The press release we issued a few days ago expresses pretty nicely how this scheme by McCain's campaign worked:

In order to receive matching funds, John McCain signed a binding agreement with the FEC to accept spending limits and to abide by the conditions of receiving those funds. The FEC makes clear that any request to withdraw from the agreement must be granted by the FEC. In other words, McCain can't just unilaterally withdraw. FEC Chairman David Mason made this clear in a letter to McCain advising him that the law requires the FEC to approve his request to withdraw from his contract.

According to past Commission rulings, the McCain campaign would not be allowed to withdraw from matching funds because it has already violated a key condition for being let out of the program - pledging matching funds as collateral for a private loan. McCain obtained a $4 million line of credit -- drew $2,971,697 from it - and documents make clear that the promise of public financing was used to secure his loan.

More than this, his campaign also got free ballot access, worth millions of dollars, because of his public financing. But now -- after he's received all this financial help -- he wants to unilaterally withdraw from the program.

This is about more than spending limits and the FEC; this is a question of integrity.

Comments - 9 »

Comments are now closed for this entry.