ExxonMcCain
Posted by Matt Ortega on August 6, 2008 at 11:26 AM
John McCain decided on a running mate for November, and it wasn't among the usual suspects. No, with the recent flood of oil money into John McCain's campaign, and his plan to give Big Oil $4 billion in tax breaks, the presumptive Republican nominee chose to run on the GOP ticket with Big Oil.
Find out what "Exxon John" supports -- money, oil, tax breaks and a "gas tax holiday" gimmick to give more money to Big Oil -- and, see what he really means when he says his energy plan is "all of the above."
Comments - 9 »
Comments - 9 «
Great idea!!
It's about time someone hits back at McCain. If Obama doesn't start hitting back, McCain will be our next President.
Posted by MRemington on August 6, 2008 at 12:55 PM
YES! Can't wait to add this bumper sticker to my "McCain is Insane: Another 100 years in Iraq?!" sticker.
Posted by Kathleen67 on August 6, 2008 at 01:44 PM
Hey. The new page is AWESOME with great factual talking points to use with voters in person and on the phone banks. But where do we go to purchase the flare?!
Posted by Kathleen67 on August 6, 2008 at 02:10 PM
Add this one to our nation's outrage. Iraq has $80B dollars stashed away in their own oil windfall accounts while we taxpayers foot the bill for everything from sewers to Taj Majal style embassies, all the while Iraq political "leaders" quabble over everything but what is important to uniting its country. Why are we still on the hoof? So American oil companies can walk in and share the oil profits because it was we taxpayers who got the oil fields up and running!! Iraq owes us, that is profits to our oil magnates at home who are scamming us out of our meal money. We paid our dues, get us out of Iraq, and stop trolling around about the surge Mr. McCain, get us our soldiers and money back!!
Posted by CalDemo on August 6, 2008 at 06:41 PM
Posted by ldb on August 6, 2008 at 07:31 PM
I would love to put this yard sign up, if I can keep my creepy neighbor away from it.
Jimmy Carter warned 31 years ago that when the pain hit, we'd first turn to increasing production in possibly hazardous ways. Thank you Exxon John.
I have more info on Carter's predictions at debn.blogspot.com
Posted by DebN on August 6, 2008 at 08:21 PM
Posted by chassie on August 6, 2008 at 10:12 PM
Are Obama Ads effective?
This is a top collection of effective ads of presidental elections from 1952-2004, study them, then you decide which type would win for Obama! 1988, is the type Karl Rove and Lee Atwater, ran against Dukakis, who really had no campaign manager to answer them, as he fired his manager, as he exposed Biden on plagery. 1964, The Dasiy ad was so effective they ran it only one time, as the Republican party was so mad, they threaten to sue! A good ad will sell usually only ONE fact, and no more, and a good picture of that fact, will sell better than words. For if you advertise 17 facts in one ad, nobody will remember anything, but if you Advertise ONE fact in that ad, 17 times they will alway remember it! Hense, CHANGE!!!
http://www.livingroomcandidate.org/
Posted by DemocracyWon on August 7, 2008 at 09:26 AM
It is sad to see so many who do not realize that obama was the only candidate to support Bush in the oil company welfare package of 2005, YES Hillary and John McCain voted against it.
It seems actions speak louder than words.
Obama voted with Bush, obama says McCain WANTS to give (note: not has given) ...who is the liar?
Obama seems to be...hmmmm.
We deserve to get McCain because of the fraud committed by the democrats who have sullied our name.
Get rid of the criminals, obama, pelosi, dean, brazille, and all the rest of these crooks and give us back out party or we will lose again.
All the rhetoric in the world cannot save us from ourselves.
The people cheering overseas for obama cannot vote so what good is all that?
Wake up and start making demands for real change
Posted by michelle_robinson on August 10, 2008 at 01:10 PM
« Hide Comments
Post a comment
