LGBT Community

President Obama signs a Memorandum on Federal Benefits and Non-Discrimination

Posted by Jonah on June 17, 2009 at 06:28 PM

Earlier this evening President Obama signed a Presidential Memorandum that will provide steps towards equality for Federal employees. The memorandum extends many benefits to same-sex partners of Federal employees that are already granted to partners of heterosexual Federal employees. After outlining the details of his Memorandum the President went further by calling on Congress to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act;

But this Presidential Memorandum is just a start. Unfortunately, my Administration is not authorized by existing Federal law to provide same-sex couples with the full range of benefits enjoyed by heterosexual married couples. That's why I stand by my long-standing commitment to work with Congress to repeal the so-called Defense of Marriage Act. It's discriminatory, it interferes with States' rights, and it's time we overturned it.

Surrounded by Representatives Tammy Baldwin and Barney Frank as well as Senators Joseph Lieberman and Susan Collins he declared his support for the Domestic Partners Benefits and Obligations Act of 2009.
The President then closed his remarks with this statement;

As Americans, we are all affected when our promises of equality go unfulfilled. Through measures like the Presidential Memorandum I am issuing today and the Domestic Partners Benefits and Obligations Act of 2009, we will advance the principles upon which our Nation was founded and continue to perfect our Union.
Comments (15) «

One small step for man. Not any where near a leap for mankind.

But at least we are moving in the right direction...till the next Republican president issues an order negating this order or the Roberts Court decides the Constitution allows discrimination.

1
SandyH on June 17, 2009 at 10:44 PM

This 'memorandum' is nothing more than a head fake to distract the LGBT community from the horrendous, insulting and homophobic brief filed by the Justice department in the DOMA case. I for one am not appeased. If the DOJ had to defend this plainly unconstitutional law it could have avoided drawing the disgusting comparisons between same-sex marriage and incest and bestiality. I am also not interested in any appeals for money from the party. You want my money? Do something to protect my rights: pass the Matthew Shepherd hate crimes bill, repeal DOMA, and repeal Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell. Instead the gay community has become acquainted with Greyhound undercarriages. The LGBT community put up in 2008. Don't think for a minute we're going to shut up.

2
jjay801 on June 18, 2009 at 12:18 AM

This is something that should have been signed on day 1.
Too little, too late.

3
drw on June 18, 2009 at 11:06 AM

This should have been signed on day 1!
Too little, too late.

4
drw on June 18, 2009 at 11:30 AM

To little to late. President Obama is back pedaling his campaign promises to the LGBT community and I for one will no longer financially support their veiled efforts for equal rights. He folded on "Don't Ask, Don't Tell", now the Justice Dept. of the President we elected has issued a brief in favor of DOMA. This is dispicable. An obvious play to the middle which is going to backfire in the mid-terms and in '12. You blew it Mr. President. Shame on you.

5
biggsrsbetter on June 18, 2009 at 06:12 PM

Obama and his all-straight circle are pursuing an outdated strategy of trying to placate the movement by coddling "gay leaders." But the movement has moved on. Barney Frank is an hoary old man. Joe Solomonese and HRC are justifiably seen as sellouts. Even the Mass Equality and California Equality people are going broke because they are overlooking the LGBT people who are younger, angrier and more impatient. And it's gonna take more than a chat with Michelle or an egg roll with Malia to keep this constituency happy. What matters even more is that this is the bellwether dilemma for Obama. Gays are just the first people to get loud and pissed about his neo-Eisenhower act. This is just the first bite in the ass they're going to get.

6
Johnnygg on June 18, 2009 at 07:06 PM

An almost worthless "memo."

The DNC will not see another penny from me until the President makes REAL change.

We're starting to catch-on. GAY ATM is closed until further notice.

7
MarkDallas on June 18, 2009 at 07:09 PM

I am a native New Englander, and luckily a dual national of Canada. My parents were Republicans and I became a Democrat in 1967, at the age of 21.

I am a liberal and recognize that the Democratic Party, since the Dixiecrats left, has been led by the DLC and DINO caucuses. Liberals and progressives are celebrities without portfolio in the DNC.

I am a gay man, who has been partnered for 33 years and we have one son. I am also a retired clergyman associated with our armed forces diocese. To say that we are disappointed in a bi-racial man whose parents were married prior to Loving v Virginia, and for other reasons, is to understate the case. I read the brief against Smelt DOMA, and Congressional DINO support for it, that I resigned from the Democratic Party, and so did my spouse...well, legally so in Canada.

Therefore, it is clear that I will never again give a plug nickel to the Democratic Party. We gave over 4K in primary and general. The GAY ATM is closed. The spigot is closed. Betrayal is the worst form of injustice. Dan Choi is a personal friend, and it is clear that you care not one wit for us. Now, the feeling is absolutely mutual.

8
BishopRaymond on June 19, 2009 at 10:01 AM

Did we make it clear? We will not support him in the mid-terms and not support his only real concern, and his only real goal, a second term.

If his constituency are moderates and conservatives regardless of party or lack of it, he better be prepared to become a one-term president.

9
BishopRaymond on June 19, 2009 at 10:16 AM

What a joke. This is another slap in the face to the gay community. Why have big goverment if we are excluded from it? It is time to organize a national coalition to get Obama out in 2012. Rahm Emanuel and Obama are not our friends.

Id rather have a republican in 2012 so we have a shot next time at getting someone who cares in the white house.

Pay back is coming for the democrats and it wont be pretty.

10
Tman on June 19, 2009 at 10:25 AM

What a joke. This is another slap in the face to the gay community. Why have big goverment if we are excluded from it? It is time to organize a national coalition to get Obama out in 2012. Rahm Emanuel and Obama are not our friends.

Id rather have a republican in 2012 so we have a shot next time at getting someone who cares in the white house.

Pay back is coming for the democrats and it wont be pretty.

11
Tman on June 19, 2009 at 10:27 AM

There are no benefits in that. He has turned on us. Obama is not getting the gay vote in 2012.

I am done

12
Tman on June 19, 2009 at 12:00 PM

Obama has declarded war on gays.

I want him OUT in 2012

13
Tman on June 19, 2009 at 03:34 PM

Obama can shove his "civil unions" up his pompous elitist married hetero arse. I'm already married, but I had to frickng move to Connecticut to do it and have at least state level equality.

I'm done with the Democrats. I bought into the everything but marriage promises. But now I know they really meant nothing but what you queers can pick off in New England.

Go screw yourselves - I'm voting Republican just to get these elitist pukes the hell out of office. And, yes I will vote Republican. Why not, I get shit either way. And at least Darth Cheney actually really believes in marriage equality.

"Fierce Advocate" is more like wimpy pissant - the man has no balls and no ability to lead - just poetic rhetoric. Inviting that homo-bigot Warren and then blacking out Gene Robinson. Obama has only said the word "gay" once since taking office and it was only to get us to open up our wallets again.

Well screw that - cut off any more donations and VOTE REPUBLICAN!!!!

14
JohnVisser on June 20, 2009 at 01:29 AM

A well written article, definitely worth reading

The Exodus Obama Forgot to Mention

by ANDRÉ ACIMAN

Published: June 8, 2009

PRESIDENT OBAMA'S speech to the Islamic world was a groundbreaking event.

Never before has a young, dynamic American president, beloved both by his countrymen and the nations of the world, extended so timely and eager a hand to a part of the globe that, recently, had seen fewer and fewer reasons to trust us or to wish us well.

As important, Mr. Obama did not mince words. Never before has a president gone over to the Arab world and broadcast its flaws so loudly and clearly: extremism, nuclear weapons programs and a faltering record in human rights, education and economic development - the Arab world gets no passing grades in any of these domains. Mr. Obama even found a moment to mention the plight of Egypt's harassed Coptic community and to criticize the new wave of Holocaust deniers. And to show he was not playing favorites, he put the Israelis on notice: no more settlements in the occupied territories. He spoke about the suffering of Palestinians. This was no wilting olive branch.

And yet, for all the president's talk of "a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world" and shared "principles of justice and progress," neither he nor anyone around him, and certainly no one in the audience, bothered to notice one small detail missing from the speech: he forgot me.

The president never said a word about me. Or, for that matter, about any of the other 800,000 or so Jews born in the Middle East who fled the Arab and Muslim world or who were summarily expelled for being Jewish in the 20th century. With all his references to the history of Islam and to its (questionable) "proud tradition of tolerance" of other faiths, Mr. Obama never said anything about those Jews whose ancestors had been living in Arab lands. long before the advent of Islam but were its first victims once rampant nationalism swept over the Arab world. Nor did he bother to mention that with this flight and expulsion, Jewish assets were - let's call it by its proper name - looted.

Mr. Obama never mentioned the belongings I still own in Egypt and will never recover. My mother's house, my father's factory, our life in Egypt, our friends, our books, our cars, my bicycle. We are, each one of us, not just defined by the arrangement of protein molecules in our cells, but also by the things we call our own. Take away our things and something in us dies. Losing his wealth, his home, the life he had built, killed my father. He didn't die right away; it took four decades of exile to finish him off.

Mr. Obama had harsh things to say to the Arab world about its treatment of women. And he said much about America's debt to Islam.

But he failed to remind the Egyptians in his audience that until 50 years ago a strong and vibrant Jewish community thrived in their midst. Or that many of Egypt's finest hospitals and other institutions were founded and financed by Jews. It is a shame that he did not remind the Egyptians in the audience of this, because, in most cases - and especially among those younger than 50 - their memory banks have been conveniently expunged of deadweight and guilt.

They have no recollections of Jews.

In Alexandria, my birthplace and my home, all streets bearing Jewish names have been renamed. A few years ago, the Library of Alexandria put on. display an Arabic translation of "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion," perhaps the most anti-Semitic piece of prose ever written.

Today, for the record, there are perhaps four Jews left in Alexandria.

When the last Jew dies, the temples and religious artifacts and books that were the property of what was once probably the wealthiest Jewish community on the Mediterranean will go to the Egyptian government - not to me, or to my children, or to any of the numberless descendants of Egyptian Jews.

It is strange that our president, a man so versed in history and so committed to the truth, should have omitted mentioning the Jews of Egypt.

He either forgot, or just didn't know, or just thought it wasn't expedient or appropriate for this venue. But for him to speak in Cairo of a shared effort "to find common ground ... and to respect the dignity of all human beings" without mentioning people in my position would be like his speaking to the residents of Berlin about the future of Germany and forgetting to mention a small detail called World War II.

André Aciman, a professor of comparative literature at the City University of New York Graduate Center, is the author of the memoir "Out of Egypt."

15
Pieranto on June 22, 2009 at 09:45 PM


« Hide Comments

Comments are now closed for this entry.