"The main characteristic of this car is that no external input is needed. The car will continue to run as long as you have a bottle of water inside for you to add from time to time," said Kiyoshi Hirasawa, Chief Executive Officer of Genepax, after he proudly announced the company's invention.
Once water is poured into the water tank at the back of the car, the newly invented energy generator takes out the hydrogen from the water, releases electrons and finally generates electrical power.
"We highly recommend our system since it does not require you to build up an infrastructure to recharge your batteries, which is usually the case for most electric cars," said Hirasawa, who is hoping to advertise the car in time for the upcoming G8 Summit in Hokkaido, Japan.
Of course the party isn't using the public criticism of requiring a loyalty pledge as the reason for the reversal, but the fact that the Democrats are also going to be holding their Presidential primary on the same day. According to the AP article, GOP leaders argue that this means there is less likely to be Democrats or Independents trying to influence the outcome of the Republican primary.
This logic, however, doesn't make very much sense because it has been known for quite some time that February 12 was the likely date for the Virginia Democrats to hold their primary for at least 8 months now. Therefore, the Republican leaders shouldn't be having this sudden realization that Democrats have their own primary that day. In other words, this is just another example of how some members of the Republican leadership in Virginia simply don't know how to be straight forward and honest with the public.
As some of you may already know, there is a special election today in Virginia. The race is for the right to represent Virginia's 1st Congressional District after Rep. Jo Ann Davis passed away earlier in the year. Although Democrat Phil Forgit is a great candidate and has really rallied his supporters, this is a heavily republican district so his supporters will really have to turn out if we hope to take over this seat.
There is an open thread taking place over at Daily Kos and at Raising Kaine (Virginia's top group blog).
As the primary season for the 2008 presidential election is rapidly approaching, I began to wonder what each candidate might do if he or she did not become the next President of the United States. More specifically, I wondered which candidates would still hold public office and therefore made up the following list which refers to how much time each candidate would have left in their current terms after the 2008 elections.
Term Ends in 2008What stood out the most to me is the fact that there are only two Republican candidates -- Senators Sam Brownback and John McCain -- who would remain in office if the weren't elected President. On the other hand, there are only two Democrats currently serving in office who would not hold public office if they lost the presidential election. Furthermore, none of the front-runners from either side of the aisle would lose their jobs if they didn't win the presidency.
Sen. Joe Biden, Rep. Dennis Kucinich, Rep. Ron Paul, Rep. Tom Tancredo, Rep. Duncan Hunter
Two years left after 2008
Sen. Sam Brownback, Sen. Chris Dodd, Sen. John McCain, Sen. Barack Obama, Gov. Bill Richardson
Four years left after 2008
Sen. Hillary Clinton
Not currently in office
John Edwards, Rudy Giuliani, Mike Gravel, Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, Fred Thompson
Now does this information really mean anything when it comes to the election? Probably not, but one could argue that the people risking their position in public office might have an added incentive to win. Nonetheless, it is a rather interesting tibit of information to look at.
Posts
