illioismel - Do not know an answer to your question but need experience, not just words
|
|
This world is a dangerous mess and millions are following a dream based on words only - no experience. It takes experience to make a dream into reality.
How exactly does Barack Obama think he is going to ride into Washington and change everything.
There are those who say Clinton could never be his vice because it would contradict his ideals of change - well what about Kennedy, Kerry, Daeschle, Hart, Richardson, Edwards and every other superdelegate who has been a part of washington over the years. Does his change include changing them too.
I just don't get how they can support someone who says they are part of the problem and have to go.
That is another reason why I do not believe Barack Obama. Is change is only a dream - it cannot possibly become a reality, unless he is wiling to throw over all those who supported him he is no more about complete change than Hillary or anyone who ever ran for office.
I prefer the slower, realistic plans to change the problems in washington of HIllary Clinton - she recognizes that our country was founded and has been successful on a systems of checks and balances and it made us the greatest nation in the world. She has not ever pointed a finger at washington and said washington is bad - as obama always does. She says the current administration is bad. Maybe she can remember a former better time, like the 90s while Obama was very young then.
I don't believe in his change or his dreams - I do not see how they can become reality without the support of all those insiders he claims to want to get rid of - yet they have supported him.
No thanks, I'll take experience as the way to turn dreams into reality over idle words of inexperience any day
How exactly does Barack Obama think he is going to ride into Washington and change everything.
There are those who say Clinton could never be his vice because it would contradict his ideals of change - well what about Kennedy, Kerry, Daeschle, Hart, Richardson, Edwards and every other superdelegate who has been a part of washington over the years. Does his change include changing them too.
I just don't get how they can support someone who says they are part of the problem and have to go.
That is another reason why I do not believe Barack Obama. Is change is only a dream - it cannot possibly become a reality, unless he is wiling to throw over all those who supported him he is no more about complete change than Hillary or anyone who ever ran for office.
I prefer the slower, realistic plans to change the problems in washington of HIllary Clinton - she recognizes that our country was founded and has been successful on a systems of checks and balances and it made us the greatest nation in the world. She has not ever pointed a finger at washington and said washington is bad - as obama always does. She says the current administration is bad. Maybe she can remember a former better time, like the 90s while Obama was very young then.
I don't believe in his change or his dreams - I do not see how they can become reality without the support of all those insiders he claims to want to get rid of - yet they have supported him.
No thanks, I'll take experience as the way to turn dreams into reality over idle words of inexperience any day
Obama has the majority of pledged delegates and has won the most contests. That will not change even including Florida and Michigan. The supers can, if they choose, override the will of those voters. I don't think they can make a legitimate argument for doing that, but they can, if they choose to do so.
So, I am simply asking that Clinton supports dig deep in their soul and support Obama if he gets the nomination. With either, neither will win.
So what do I do? Does that make me a bad democrat to have such strong feelings? I don't think so.
And unlike Hillary, he didn't vote in favor of cluster bombs.
And speaking of "dangerous" I sure the heck don't want someone in office who has run her campaign as poorly as Clinton has. She is lucky that is belongs to the financially elite--otherwise her campaign would have folded in February.
Just like he wasn't in the pew to hear the exact sermons where Rev Wright called us kkk of A, and hate filled, and white supremists.
He wasnt' there to know Rezko's business either - he only worked for him for 5 hours. That is bull. Rezko has donated to his campaigns for years (See Chicago Sun articles under Rezko and Obama)
He somehow always puts himself in a position to claim deniability.
He couldn't even handle the last debate without getting frustrated and stumbling for words.
He would never have held up to the media or the pundits or even the little criticms that he blasts her with.
I do have to hand it to him. His staff WAS excellent - at least until Penn left. I would take Clinton's current staff anyday over his. Penn was awful.
You should look at the primaries since Ohio. Barack has been blown away in votes and delegates since then. In the big states that will produce the electoral votes needed. The caucuses were made for him and are discriminatory to the groups that support Clinton. They usually represent about 10% of the vote from that state. In an open election - when the elderly, the handicapped, the blue collar workers, etc get out and vote she will have their support - Obama might not
They need to pack their bags. Our democratic system DEMANDS a new overhaul and we need to be there to demand it.
Or maybe he'll call on Rezko to heal our real estate market problems. Wright has offered to be his vp.
Seriously, he claims that all washington insiders are bad so who is he going to gather? More personal friends like bush did. Like his friend that headed up FEMA. That worked really well.
Obama is a hypocrite if he uses even one Washington insider as part of his team and a fool if he doesn't.