All Gays should always vote
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
It is my hope that all GLBT New Mexicans will vote in every election. Please register to vote and find your polling place. Together we may help bring about change in our governments to acknowledge and support us in our efforts to educate the public that homosexuality and gender are not choices but biological situations. We deserve government protection from descrimination and the equal access to governmental services accorded to our heterosexual brothers and sisters.

Reader Comments
  
Everyone Should Vote Period!
By George Wilcox Sep 5th 2006 at 7:09 pm EDT
Everyone interested in social justice should vote, straight, gay, lesbian or bi - it's the American way!
Re: Everyone Should Vote Period!
By Jay Justice Sep 5th 2006 at 11:58 pm EDT
Yes, but it is doubly important for those of us struggling under the fist of the religious ultra-right-wing, conservative-controlled Republican party to make our voices heard whenever we have the opportunity.

GLBT civil rights are being trampled on every single day. We are not afforded the same liberties, rights and freedoms of our heterosexual brothers and sisters. It is the ultra-conservative that choose to define us biblically instead of scientifically. When religious doctrine instead of imperical evidence is allowed to dictate policy, people who do not fit within that doctrine become the oppressed and outcasts of society.

Our only hope is to bring the voice of reason and logic to our country supporting strong scientific evidence that we are as natural as any other creature on this planet and being homosexual is a natural, biological part of humanity. When enough people see the truth of this, only then may we hope to win our protection from those in our government who would unjustly oppress us.
  
Gay republicans?
By Stephen Inskeep Sep 5th 2006 at 8:35 pm EDT
I agree, everyone should be voting, but maybe the gay republicans should start looking in their hearts and minds and decide whose side they are on! How can they support a party that spreads hatred towards us?
Re: Gay republicans?
By Peter Calvet Sep 6th 2006 at 3:44 pm EDT
Gay Republicans agree with the right-wing agenda exept for the gay-bashing part. It's like if a black person would believe in the KKK agenda except for the lynching part.
Re: Gay republicans?
By Porgie Tirebiter Sep 7th 2006 at 12:07 am EDT
This one ALWAYS confuses me....in my district (the 19th here in NY) Congress Woman Sue Kelly voted not once, but TWICE to support a consitutional amendment to make gays second class citizens. Yet, her gay opponent in the primary (a Log Cabin Republican) dropped out of the race and announced that he and the Log Cabin Republicans would again be supporting her for re-election....that makes NO SENSE TO ME.
  
True, but not enough
By David Sep 6th 2006 at 3:43 pm EDT
While Karl Rove is evil, he is also very intelligent (reminds me of Saddam). The whole gay marriage issue was a brilliant and very successful effort to gain what I call the Stupid Bigot vote(*). Sadly, there are far more stupid bigots in this country than any of us would like to admit. And you can bet that the Republicans will go for their vote again.

The challenge, and I hate to actually write this, is to get the Stupid Bigot vote. The Democratic Party needs to identify some emotionally charged issues on which to capitalize.

Substance is good, but people usually make decisions for emotional reasons, not rational ones.

* "Stupid" because it was a blatant attempt to divert attention from far more substantial issues that played against the Republican Party. "Bigot" because the only reason people got emotionally excited about the issue was due to bigotry. What other basis is there for a Constitutional Amendment whose sole purpose is to prevent a group of people from ever having a specific freedom?
Re: True, but not enough
By Peter Calvet Sep 6th 2006 at 3:55 pm EDT
I agree with the stupid bigot part, but unfortunately that's not all of it. I personally know people (in my own family) that believe that homosexuality is morally wrong and that the government sould not "sanction" this morally bad behavior. These are real folks who are not necessarily bigots or even bad people. These folks are the bigger challenge. They need to understand that being gay is not a "life-style" choice as the Christian Coaltion preaches.
Re: True, but not enough
By Jay Justice Sep 11th 2006 at 8:46 pm EDT
There is more and more scientific evidence that homosexuality has a biological basis and virtually none indicating it is a choice.

Judy Foreman, a columnist for the Boston Globe, wrote the following in the last paragraph of this article, Link

"...Dr. Fred Berlin, a psychiatrist at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, said the basic conclusion is already clear: Homosexuality, he said, "is not due to voluntary choice. None of us as kids sat down and said, `Do I want to be attracted to members of the same gender?' " "

If it's clearly not a choice, then it cannot be an issue of morality. We need to support and empower the investigators and scientists who are objectively researching homosexuality. It is their voices (and reports) that may one day win us our freedom from oppression. It has always been the light of scientific fact and reason that has dispelled the shadows of fear and ignorance.
  
ANY REASON THAT
By LITTLE DINE' FOR RECALL ON COLUMBUS DAY Apr 5th 2008 at 3:52 am EDT
tTHEY SHOULDNT, AS LONG AS THEY VOTE DEM.