Curious
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
I was wondering why the post by stupid.voter was so dangerous to anyone. I have posted pictures of my grandson. Talked about him. Other people have posted pictures of their kids too. Including showing pictures. So why would that post be so offensive?
Or was the justification of the KKKs action the real reason the post had to go? I mean, come on they were a bunch of murderous thugs who pretty much butchered, castrated and hung anyone they thought they could get away with. And vigilante action is never the right way.

Reader Comments
  
Because
By Matt May 13th 2008 at 6:32 pm EDT
it was your choice to post that information. And it probably did not include your personal email address or name. Posting a child's name without the permission of the parent is reprehensible and so is posting a person's name and email address.

And why the great concern. It's not like anyone is saying you had anything to do with it ... is it?

No one in the group you mentioned attempted to justify the savage behavior of the kkk only render a history of its existence. The picture you refer to was intended to be an example of cruel people.

But I digress. No one has a right to publish anothers' personal information here and children are to be protected not exploited.

Me thinks thou protesteth too much.