Divine Wind
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
In the waning months of WWII, the Japanese generals were facing dire prospects. They knew they couldn’t win the war but they couldn't admit defeat, either. They believed in the divine purpose behind their cause. Further, to admit defeat was a catastrophic loss of face.

The generals would not sue for peace. They would press on in the face of certain failure.

So, with their resources depleted, they dreamed up a new tactic: Kamikaze. With no real resources left, their military in shambles, the Japanese used what precious little they had in a dramatic, if desperate, attempt to win the war.  They sent young, mostly untrained, pilots on missions designed to destroy their enemy. There was no real logic to the attacks -- just get through the defenses and crash into the enemy. Do the most damage possible.

And they caused considerable damage to the American fleet. Scores of American vessels were sunk or badly damaged; thousands of sailors died.

And for what?

It was a plan destined to fail. Worse, it proved to the American military that the Japanese were willing to do anything to stay in the war. That thought factored into the decision to use atomic bombs on civilian targets in Japan. Hundreds of thousands died unnecessarily.

What of the pilots? Well, they were expendable. They got rousing sendoffs as they began their last missions. Some were too frightened to resist; they died. Some were caught up in the moment; they died. Some were real believers; they died, too. In the end, each died alone, perhaps not realizing that the forces of their enemy were beyond their pitiful attacks.

What of the Japanese generals? Most committed suicide rather than admit defeat. In that way, they didn't have to face the people at home. It was a cowardly act disguised as the ultimate in bravery.

Reader Comments
  
You must learn to
By Democrat in Minneapolis, MN Jun 2nd 2008 at 11:34 pm EDT
lose before you can win, I believe this shall happen.
Re: You must learn to
By Liz Jun 4th 2008 at 8:22 am EDT
Eveyone has three choices

1.) Vote Republican
2.) Vote Democrat
3.) Vote for a 3rd party /vote for write-in = not voting

Ramifications:
1.) You have chosen to vote against everything that Hillary and Barack stand for
2.) You will fight to achieve Barack and Hillary's goals
3.) You've just wasted your time and gas money
Re: You must learn to
By Liz Jun 4th 2008 at 8:24 am EDT
and if you think that it is construed that Hillary lost this election that she will even win her re-election to the senate, I think you are wrong.

If that happens she will have lost all the black vote in the state of New York that she needs to win and no one in the party would fault Robert Kennedy's son for running against her.
  
Re: Your point is.........
By AnneK Jun 3rd 2008 at 9:07 am EDT
His point is that desperate, suicidal attempts to win a war that is already lost, as we can see by examining history, really never succeed in changing things.
  
Re: Their own version of jihad...
By Gretchen Jun 3rd 2008 at 11:30 am EDT
My husband who is a retired Naval Captain, understands why those attacks occurred on 9/11-- He watched the U.S.S. Missouri obliterate a mountain in Beirut on rumor that there were terrorists in those mountains. No care for the families and children that also resided in those mountains. When the U.S attacks families and children, why should we be surprised when they come here and attack.

If you think the U.S. is innocent I have some Ocean Front property in Kansas to sell you. We are guilty of what we call diplomacy but others call terrorism when their families and children are killed or injured because of our actions...
Excellent post!!!
By Gretchen Jun 3rd 2008 at 11:31 am EDT
Paul BTW!!!! Thanks!
  
yet, with this "cowardice" in unison...
By Vidya Jun 3rd 2008 at 12:54 am EDT
isn't ironic they own so much of American Industry, and real estate. That little island is an adult giant, among teensy toddlers.
Re: yet, with this "cowardice" in unison...
By AnneK Jun 3rd 2008 at 9:10 am EDT
Actually they're like the 6th largest foreign investor.

Check out how much industry and real estate are owned by the Swiss and the Dutch... the peaceful giants control a lot more than the little Island.
Re: yet, with this "cowardice" in unison...
By Blueberry Jun 3rd 2008 at 11:07 am EDT
Don't forget CANADA....damn mounties...
Hmmm
By Vidya Jun 3rd 2008 at 11:20 pm EDT
Well I've never considered the Dutch peaceful..that's new one.
Amsterdam is cool, love it there, but the Dutch are pretty nasty control freaks, they were the catalyst for apartheid and the
genocide between the Tootsies and Hootoos in Rwanda.

Switzerland is just a deep pocket for dirty money to sit and stew. The swiss who have never had the balls to anything other than sit when told to. They have been neutral for financial reasons, they get a free get out of jail card, from any war, like they did from Hitler. They, like Sweden, would allow any atrocity as long as the banks were safe. The Swiss make money off of money, yes, they are wealthy but also beholden to all the true owners of the majority of that money world wide, mostly not the Swiss. Probably one of the reasons they got no stones.

Though I do give them some credit, they have been trying very hard to excuse themselves for not fighting the nazi's and do try and clean things up when told to.

Link

With a banking system like theirs it is hard not to be complacent. That is my general opinion of the Swiss and the Dutch reputations in regards to their respective governments history. Like I said Amsterdam is one of the best places in the world, and the people are great, never been to Switzerland though.
  
I had to read it
By AnneK Jun 3rd 2008 at 10:05 am EDT
I thought you had done something crazy like visit Marty and have beans for dinner.
Re: I had to read it
By Paul Thompson Jun 3rd 2008 at 7:19 pm EDT
I'm crazy... but not that crazy.
  
B-29 Superfortress
By Arius Jun 3rd 2008 at 10:13 am EDT
It flew so high, it couldn't be intercepted by the Zero. It flew right over their heads, and their lack of know-how prevented them from doing anything about it.
Re: B-29 Superfortress
By Paul Thompson Jun 3rd 2008 at 7:16 pm EDT
So, to a high degree, they were just making noise?
  
Am I the only one
By Woman at Large Jun 3rd 2008 at 12:13 pm EDT
who thinks this post is not about war, but about Clinton/Obama supporters? There's just so much symbolism floating around -- you wouldn't know this, but I never, even in high school, though Robert Frost was talking about death when he wrote "Passing by Woods on a Snowy Evening." (Not trying to be obtuse, and some of you will know what I mean).
  
Illustration
By Linda Holt Madrid Jun 3rd 2008 at 12:18 pm EDT
I remember a Disney movie about a brave courageous boy who entered a sled race with his dog.
Though the other dogs were bigger than him, the little dog ran bravely and was honestly determined to win for his master.
He ran as fast as he could go, as long as he could go.
But he fell over and died from exhaustion right at the finish line, (I can't remember if he won)
But I do remember his love for his master. His strength came from his love for the boy.
It is always admirable to see courage when in adversity.
Though one may not win the "prize" still it is the charactar of the fighter that remains in the memory of the sane observers.
  
I believe I cought your point
By Retired Army Jun 3rd 2008 at 12:39 pm EDT
but I will still not vote for Obama. I won't crash and burn, nor destroy any property or harm any others intentionally. My belief is that just because some feel that the messiah has arrived don't mean I have to believe in him.

I do not trust him and as evidenced here on the blog by many of his supporters there is no way I would trust him as POTUS!
Re: I believe I cought your point
By Paul Thompson Jun 3rd 2008 at 7:37 pm EDT
Unfortunately, Don, others haven't got your self-control. There's been a lot of personal destruction around here, lately. On both sides. And there is no discernible value to any of it.

The time to begin the process of rebuilding is upon us. That needs to be done before we lose even more voices from PartyBuilder.

If you don't like Obama, that's fine. I don't support Obama, either. But there is much, much more to the Democratic party than its presidential nominee. People, irrespective of camp, should be able to come together around Congressional and state candidates, as well as progressive ballot proposals.

Continuing the attacks and counter-attacks until the party is damaged beyond repair is senseless. A McCain-appointed Supreme Court will be the atomic end of liberalism in this country.

We cannot afford that. It's time to start healing.
Re: I believe I caught your point
By Retired Army Jun 3rd 2008 at 8:02 pm EDT
Thanks Paul but I feel not a loss because Obama won but a loss that I truly feel America has lost. I wasn't a Clinton supporter previously but when JRE dropped out I looked at where MY and my family's main concerns were.

In his support for his church, then not, same with his pastor and then to top off warning signals of non-americanism in his wifes dramatic remarks set us on another path.

These feelings cannot not be bent around to unite us when they are historical gerogatory remarks said in the heat of political battle. I feel raped as to who is going to possibly lead us! I cannot vote for this couple because they just don't meet my standard of bbeing true americans! Sorry but that is the way we feel!

Many on this blog will come up with scenarios of I will be responsible for the deaths of soldiers, continued war, of being stupid, etc. Well both he a Clinton renewed monies for the continuation of the war and I do not see that he will stop the war. No positive plans to do so! If McCain ends up as the POTUS will the likes of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid change things or keep him in check. I doubt it because they have already shown they will only do what is politically correct to attain their reelection.

I can only hope that a new democratic majority (which we already have but are afraid to exercise their jobs) will rein him in.

But in any case thanks for being one of the civil ones because there aren't many of them on the blog anymore. Mostly trash and their attitudes spell disaster for the once great democratic party!
Re: I believe I caught your point
By Woman at Large Jun 3rd 2008 at 9:25 pm EDT
You have voiced my feelings, and those of many others, very clearly.
Re: I believe I caught your point
By Linda Holt Madrid Jun 4th 2008 at 5:07 pm EDT
I sure hope you didn't think I referred to Obama, public enemy number two after Osama who is number one, in my little sled race story.
My illustration referred to Hillary, how she perservered regrdless of the biased media..
Patrick Henry would have been proud of her.
  
Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Deleted by admin
Re: God isn't political, then, is he?
By griffith Jun 3rd 2008 at 6:56 pm EDT
We have a natural existence that is determined by the natural right to self-determination. When the way it is violates the way it should be by choice, we naturally pay the consequences.

It behooves us to build the coalition for change.

Vote the Democratic candidate.

Very best wishes.