Get it right
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
The holding facilty in Denver was put up by the Denver PD, will be staffed by the Denver PD and has nothing to do with the Democratic National Committee.

The DNC is not paying for it, not staffing it and has nothing to do with the sale after the Convention.

Come on...do you really think DNC staffers will be fingerprinting people and arresting them? Pleeeezzzz.

To imply it is DNC jail or holding facility is hogwash.

All by Denver PD for security.

Reader Comments
  
well
By Someonewhocares Aug 21st 2008 at 1:57 pm EDT (Updated Aug 21st 2008 at 1:57 pm EDT)
if anyone was dumb enough to think that dnc members were going to be finger printing anyone well then politics is not for them.
You know what was meant by it and you continue to show your true colors as well as draw more attention to the treatment some dems have been giving others. You really have no idea how many people have been watching and how bad YOU make OUR party look!
Re: well
By Lincoln Park Dem Aug 21st 2008 at 1:59 pm EDT (Updated Aug 21st 2008 at 1:59 pm EDT)
I am not the one that titled a blog, "DNC jail". That makes our party look good? Pleeezzz
All of these posts are full copyrighted articles.
Re: well
By Barbara"Obama/Biden"Hussein Aug 21st 2008 at 2:29 pm EDT (Updated Aug 21st 2008 at 2:29 pm EDT)
I say it makes the DNC look bad. The police will be rresting people who break the LAW. Which is what they get paid t do.


So if you are planning to break the LAW, well then you should suffer the cost. Thats how it works. BTW, I posted a Blog telling every body that Denver spent $50 million on Crowd control weapons last month. There is no plan to arrest peaceful protestors. But considering the amount spent, Someone convinced the police they meant trouble. So, OH WELL!

The Police are ready. I say Great Job. Better safe than sorry.
I do wish you could
By Vidya Aug 21st 2008 at 2:02 pm EDT (Updated Aug 21st 2008 at 2:02 pm EDT)
tone down your rhetoric with the posts, LPD.

Is there really ever really a need to be harsh, caustic, and abrasive when no one is threatening you personally?
If she feels that term DNC jail is appropriate.
By Vidya Aug 21st 2008 at 2:04 pm EDT (Updated Aug 21st 2008 at 2:04 pm EDT)
Rather than poo pooing and rudely dismissive denial, be gracious, engage her concerns, try approaching it from her perspective.

You will not start as many fights that way.....dear. lol
All of these posts are full copyrighted articles.
  
five stars Lincoln
By Liz Aug 21st 2008 at 2:04 pm EDT (Updated Aug 21st 2008 at 2:04 pm EDT)
all excellent points

and true
  
All of these posts are full copyrighted articles.
  
Okay
By Sue Sue's Straight Talk Express Aug 21st 2008 at 2:09 pm EDT (Updated Aug 21st 2008 at 2:09 pm EDT)
So the original poster used a title that was probably meant to grab our attention. That is not the point and should not be our concern.

The problem as I see it is the fact that his post was deleted without the moderator saying anything to him. We are all reasonable here, if the moderator did not like the title or felt it was too inflamatory, he should have sent the poster an e-mail, explained his position and I am sure SOMEONEWHOCARES, would have changed it.
Re: Okay
By Sue Sue's Straight Talk Express Aug 21st 2008 at 2:10 pm EDT (Updated Aug 21st 2008 at 2:10 pm EDT)
Or whomever was the original poster.
All of these posts are full copyrighted articles.
Re: Okay
By Someonewhocares Aug 21st 2008 at 2:12 pm EDT (Updated Aug 21st 2008 at 2:12 pm EDT)
Yeah I would have changed it. NOBODY gave me that chance and I have posted and Pmed asking for guidlines and gotten nothing.... definatly nothing that would pertain to the title of the blog.... but whatever.... hopfully it doesnt get deleted this time.