Post from Ed's Blog:
Bringing out the White Queen
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.

In chess, you know you're dealing with an amateur when a player opens up his beginning game by streaking the queen across the board. Although it may daunt another amateur player, more experienced players see it as an opportunity to gain the immediate upper hand, as an out of position, unprotected piece can easily be exploited in a variety of maneuvers. It also leaves the aggressor's king exposed, and the subsequent back-pedaling will end up costing many moves. The board can be set for a check mate relatively quickly if one responds properly.

The political game is much like chess. Aggressive gambits always seem to fail one way or another. John McCain's amateurish choice of Sarah Palin as his Vice Presidential running mate is one such move. It might seem a bit daunting to Democrats worried about the white female vote, but ultimately this assertive maneuver backfires for several reasons.

First, it's a pathetically transparent pander to Hillary Clinton's supporters. But the only thing Palin has in common with Hillary is her gender. Palin is pro-life; Clinton is pro-choice and seen as a champion for women's issues. Clinton supports universal health care, and has put her career on the line for this issue. Palin has fought only for corporate interest on the issue. Clinton has over 30 years of public service. Palin has been governor of Alaska for just 2 years. Prior to that, her resume consists of being mayor of a town of only 8000 people and a sports broadcaster. Clinton had a plan to end our dependence on foreign oil and spark our economy through a major investment in alternative energies. Palin is pro-drilling in our national parks and is inextricably tied to oil giant BP through marriage. She has far more in common with Dick Cheney than Hillary Clinton. Clinton supporters will be turned off by this cheap attempt to capitalize on Hillary's lifetime of achievement. Clinton proved herself through her command of issues and personal resilience. It was her skill and intelligence that broke the glass ceiling. Palin was chosen primarily because she is female. That's going to be seen as an insult to everybody who worked so hard on the Clinton campaign. Furthermore, Hillary Clinton is a newly knighted supporter of Obama. Clinton, who some speculated might sit this one out, will undoubtedly come out and attack the credibility of Palin as VP.

The Republicans clearly want to test the resolve of the Democratic Party. But in doing so, they fail to address the problems of their own party, which is increasingly being seen as interested acquiring offices rather than running the country. Herein lies is the second problem with this choice. Palin is very hard to imagine as commander in chief, not because she is woman, but because she is so inexperienced. That's disconcerting because McCain would be the oldest President ever elected. If he cannot finish his term, we'd be relying on the young, inexperienced political pick of Palin as the leader of the free world. Isn't inexperience the raucous attack theme being leveled by Republicans against Obama? Obama actually has more experience than Palin, and he's backed up by Joe Biden, who has more experience than everybody. So take that line of attack off the board. The Obama-Biden ticket not only seems more energetic and up to the task of change, but also now appears as the more practiced and professional ticket as well. Both bring a host of skills and experience to the table. Palin brings the political appeal of her gender but very little else.

Granted, old man McCain didn't really have all that many great choices. Tom Ridge would have been the best pick, but because he is not hardcore Christian enough, he was slighted. Governor Charlie Crist of Florida was in the mix, but that choice would have turned off the homophobe vote. Mitt Romney seemed like the likely pick, but again, he lacked WWJD credentials for the job because he believes that the savior was a mere prophet. So the Christian right gets what it desires, a person who abhors women who have abortions as much as they do. The oil companies also get to sneak another Vice President into the White House as well. On top of that, she's young, pretty, and female. Clearly, McCain covered all the political bases. The problem is, the rest of the country is moving in a different direction. The petty political games and silly attack themes seem more appropriate for a class president election rather than the election of United States President. Republicans will somehow find a way to rally behind this pick, just as some of them have found a way to rally behind Bush. But on November 4th , check mate will finally come.

Reader Comments
  
hmmm
By purple summer Aug 29th 2008 at 4:11 pm EDT (Updated Aug 29th 2008 at 4:11 pm EDT)
this is hardly the beginning of the game.
Re: hmmm
By Private Joker Aug 29th 2008 at 4:15 pm EDT (Updated Aug 29th 2008 at 4:15 pm EDT)
It's still August. This game has just started.

Right now we're only ahead 6 points. We should shoot for 15+ on November 4th.

LANDSLIDE '08!
Re: hmmm
By purple summer Aug 29th 2008 at 4:19 pm EDT (Updated Aug 29th 2008 at 4:19 pm EDT)
the polls are not indicating a landslide, maybe slow seep.
Re: hmmm
By Terry Aug 29th 2008 at 6:25 pm EDT (Updated Aug 29th 2008 at 6:25 pm EDT)
Glad I cannot be accussed of not voting against history now as all votes are now historical.

You guys crack me up. Still scared of a woman.

We should have had Hillary as vp.

Now it is up to Joe.
Re: hmmm
By Private Joker Aug 29th 2008 at 6:41 pm EDT (Updated Aug 29th 2008 at 6:41 pm EDT)
C'mon Terry, most of us would have voted for Hillary and you know this. Hillary would have been a great VP, but it would have been a media circus. I think her role in the campaign right now is perfect. She's uniting the party and setting herself up very well for a future run if somehow Obama fails to win this year.

Biden is a much more excellent choice for VP than Palin.
Re: hmmm
By Terry Aug 29th 2008 at 7:47 pm EDT (Updated Aug 29th 2008 at 7:47 pm EDT)
Yes some would and some would not have voted for Hillary. Just remember you cannot blame her anymore for the election results. Now it is up to Joe as I previously stated.

On Palin, why the fuss? I have already stated my view. What is yours?
Re: hmmm
By Private Joker Aug 29th 2008 at 7:52 pm EDT (Updated Aug 29th 2008 at 7:52 pm EDT)
My view on Palin is the basis of this post. I don't think she's a strong choice, nor do I think she can reasonably be compared to Hillary. I've always maintained that Hillary is an major asset to this campaign and this party.

And historic, well, actually she's not the first female VP on the ticket. Walter Mondale/Geraldine Ferraro 1984. I don't think McCain will win this election.
Re: hmmm
By Terry Aug 29th 2008 at 8:14 pm EDT (Updated Aug 29th 2008 at 8:14 pm EDT)
Fair enough.

FYI

You might have not meant it but the title of your post may be offensive to others.

May I refer you to my link below for assistance?

Link
Re: hmmm
By Sharkhunter Aug 29th 2008 at 4:38 pm EDT (Updated Aug 29th 2008 at 4:38 pm EDT)
Landslide for Obama/Biden perhaps. But you know, as this site itself has proven when it comes to some race/gender outweigh issues. Some will support Palin soly on gender even hoping/wishing for a mccain victory and quick death to see a woman in power even though she may be diametrically opposed on issues.
Re: hmmm
By Steve Wilson Aug 29th 2008 at 4:18 pm EDT (Updated Aug 29th 2008 at 4:18 pm EDT)
as in game-changer....evidently McCain's advisors thought the old game was over and tried to start a new one....and moved the queen. This post is brilliant.

Private Joker, I hope you have a "more widely read" site that you post on.
Re: hmmm
By Private Joker Aug 29th 2008 at 4:36 pm EDT (Updated Aug 29th 2008 at 4:36 pm EDT)
Thank you very much Steve.

I contribute to other sites. My Republican friend and I started a site crookedcrux.com, but we're not very good at managing it. We're looking for more regular contributers and we have a forum area as well. So check it out.

It's a bit messy, but we're working on it.
Re: hmmm
By Steve Wilson Aug 29th 2008 at 5:11 pm EDT (Updated Aug 29th 2008 at 5:11 pm EDT)
very interesting....I now have it bookmarked. Thanks.
  
I agree with your comments.
By Maggie B. Aug 29th 2008 at 4:16 pm EDT (Updated Aug 29th 2008 at 4:16 pm EDT)
McCain tried to be slick but it is going to backfire on him and as you put it, checkmate.
  
Good post!
By WRM Aug 29th 2008 at 4:31 pm EDT (Updated Aug 29th 2008 at 4:31 pm EDT)
And I'm changing my chess "Tactics'" :)
  
Five stars private joker
By Liz Aug 29th 2008 at 4:38 pm EDT (Updated Aug 29th 2008 at 4:38 pm EDT)
It might possibly have been a winning strategy, but not with McCain as the player.

and people forget as apparently does McCain: his party is VERY CONSERVATIVE. AND they are VERY MUCH A CLIQUE. The do not "cotton" to newcomers and tend to eat their own from time to time--much less "a stranger" amongst them.

Look how much work and how long it took Obama to wrest the Democratic party from the clutches of its conservatives.

Palin does not have that much time, nor experience, nor skill.

I would not be a bit surprised if the GOP smiling and with the utmost of gentility, simply told McCain NO and selected a different VP at the convention next week--that is my prediction.
Re: Five stars private joker
By purple summer Aug 29th 2008 at 5:06 pm EDT (Updated Aug 29th 2008 at 5:06 pm EDT)
now that would be interesting, if the republicans decided to choose another at the convention.
Re: Five stars private joker
By Private Joker Aug 29th 2008 at 6:52 pm EDT (Updated Aug 29th 2008 at 6:52 pm EDT)
They're definitely going with this pick. It's 100% political too.

And don't be fooled by appearances Liz, Governor Palin is a staunch conservative. Think Dan Quayle.
Re: Five stars private joker
By Terry Aug 29th 2008 at 7:51 pm EDT (Updated Aug 29th 2008 at 7:51 pm EDT)
Can you spell "potatoe" ???

;)
  
nice post
By D. Tree Aug 30th 2008 at 5:54 pm EDT (Updated Aug 30th 2008 at 5:54 pm EDT)
well done!
  
Great Analogy
By Sue Sue's Straight Talk Express Aug 30th 2008 at 8:34 pm EDT (Updated Aug 30th 2008 at 8:34 pm EDT)
Good job!