______ for President '08
|
|
| Also listed in: Advocates for Single-Payer Health Care | Artists For Democratic Progress | Kicking Ass | Old Kennedy-type Democrats | The Liberal Democratic party of the United States of America |
Who's name goes in the blank. This is where we as Democrats get into trouble. Too often we have too many candidates running around saying things against their opponent. This is politics. However we all know that all this does is give the eventual GOP nominee ammunition. So this time lets see if we can't rally around a candidate before Iowa. We know who wants the job. So we have a little more than a year for candidates to get together and join in a concerted effort to elect a Democratic President. We cannot withstand months of Biden saying Obama is too inexperience. Feingold will charge that Wes Clark has never run for elected office. Hillary will wait as long as possible for the field to weed out the weaker candidates. Maybe Dr. Dean can call for a presidential summit. A meeting those candidates can attend and jointly agree on a field of two or three strong representatives of the Democratic Party. Those contenders can also agree to find a way to showcase their individual strengths without making claims designed to weaken their opponent. Every time Democratic candidates weaken their opponents they strengthen their eventual Republican opponent.
This upcoming Presidential election should be conservative versus liberal election part two. We are on an upswing of liberal thinking. The neocons have shown an ugly side of conservative thinking. We must show that we can be strong leaders. We need to search the Democratice Party for just that a strong leader. For years both parties have sought strong politicians to run for President. We need leaders not politicians. We have plenty of politicians but are a little light on true leaders. Politicians show us how to win elections. Leaders show us how to be a great nation. So let the search begin.
This upcoming Presidential election should be conservative versus liberal election part two. We are on an upswing of liberal thinking. The neocons have shown an ugly side of conservative thinking. We must show that we can be strong leaders. We need to search the Democratice Party for just that a strong leader. For years both parties have sought strong politicians to run for President. We need leaders not politicians. We have plenty of politicians but are a little light on true leaders. Politicians show us how to win elections. Leaders show us how to be a great nation. So let the search begin.
Let the word go forth from this time and place, that the torch has been passed to a new generationof Democrats. A new generation born after the Nixon resignation, is now ready to choose their leaders. So lets give them the best choices not all of the choices.

I ask you to join us in this cause and make a contribution to our campaign for Hillary right now. Let make history together!
Link
From craigslist for Hillary =>
Link
So is Vilsak (again) from Iowa
Probably Bayh of Indiana too......
Clark maybe (I hope)
Edwards
Hillary (no thanks)
MURTHA would be GREAT!
or Gore but I don't think he wants it bad enough.
Check out One America Committee for his speeches, news, travels, podcast, and blog.
Link
-snakelips
For instance, fiscal responsibility has long been identified as a conservative value, yet Republicans have made a mockery of it. Democrats who refuse to indulge in profiligate spending, want a balanced budget, smaller government (savings invested in other programs), zero based budgeting, and other such fiscally responsible agenda will find they have an eager audience.
The biggest mistake both parties are making these days is playing into this liberal vs conservative schism. You are making a serious mistake if you believe this last election had anything whatever to do with liberal vs conservative. The election was a backlash against ethics violations, corruption, and a do-nothing congress which preferred to fight and indulge in photo opportunities than it did addressing the critical issues facing this nation. They had a chance and the momentum with border security and immigration reform and they blew it in preference to pandering to their big business base and ignoring the wishes of the people.
If the Democratic party makes this next election a moratorium on liberal versus conservative they will go down so hard and so fast it will leave their heads spinning. The electorate is sick to death of partisan bickering and finger pointing. They want action, no matter what label that action wears. They want compromise and bipartisanship that obtains results. Mostly they don't give a fuzzy rat's backside what label you place on those results.
Dennis Kucinich is the ONLY candidate who is actually proposing a Universal, Single-Payer Health Care Plan.
His idea is to expand Medicare, a system we already have in place, to include everyone.
ALL of the other candidates advocate a blend of private insurers with government subsidies, which will inevitably leave people falling through the cracks. Edwards wants to make it like car insurance, and actually require people to pay for it by law.
I don't believe anything that includes for-profit Insurance Companies will succeed; rather I predict such a system would be bankrupt in 3 years. There was an experimental tryout in TN which used 7 HMOs, and it failed miserably.
All the frontrunners say they will cover people, but most only get specific about child coverage.
Child coverage is already there. Medicaid will cover children of parents below a certain income level, but it will NOT cover adults.
Why? Because it's fairly cheap to cover kids--well baby visits and the odd broken arm, plus a few ear infections are about all there is to it.
I think it's a little deceptive of candidates to make a big deal of this as if the idea were original to them!
C'mon, Hillary! Where's the resolve from a decade ago? And Barack... his "universal" idea also blends private insurance? There can be no lasting, workable reform as long as private insurers are allowed to sell coverage that a public program will offer.
"If private insurers are allowed to cherry pick the healthy, leaving the public health care system with the very sick, the system cannot help but fail. This is part of what is happening in U.S. health care now." Link
They should jointly and publicly pledge: the Democratic presidential nominee, whoever she or he is, will making passing HR 676, the single payer health insurance bill, the administration's first priority. They will lose the financial backing of the insurance and pharmaceutical lobbies of course, but they'll gain the gratitude of the majority of the people they say they want to serve.
Our Democratic party is in danger of becoming irrelevant unless we concentrate on ideas which benefit the people instead of "Hillary should win because she has the most money because she sold out to the health insurance companies."
I challenge all of you to focus on ideas.
Compare the ideas in the Top Ten List at www.franklynch.org against the obsolete 20th century baloney of promises made but not kept with which the other candidates insult us.