Dance With Who Brought You
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
Remember back when we were all wondering who would run against George W. in 2004? Other than Kerry and Edwards, and the usual gang, I remember how a lot of democrats actually marveled at the idea of Hillary Clinton. Well, as we all know, she said no. Maybe it was too soon, maybe she was too divisive, or maybe she just wasn’t ready. So, we said, all right Kerry/Edwards it is, and now, so much for that. So what do we suppose Sen. Clinton has been doing since 2004? I would say she has been positioning herself as president this whole time; not just president of the democrats, but she has moved herself toward the middle of partisan politics to become president of all America.

I think it’s funny how I hear a lot of people, who vote against Hillary Clinton, say that she’s been in Washington for 16 years but has accomplished virtually nothing, so we need a change, we need a new kind of politics, we need hope, and so, we need Sen. Obama! I wonder if these people ever listened to what Sen. Clinton’s colleagues have had to say about her ability to work against divisive partisan lines in the Senate, I wonder if these people were just as negative toward Sen. Clinton when the possibility of her running in 2004 came up, I wonder if these people ever did like Sen. Clinton or all the Clintons at all, and I wonder if these people were even paying any attention until now.

But please don’t get me wrong; I think the fact that Sen. Obama has brought in millions of new voters to this process is indeed, absolutely amazing. But, I cannot help but wonder where the heck these people were for the past eight years. Some will say they needed to be inspired, and that they were too cynical and sick and tired of the “usual” Washington politics. And, Sen. Obama brought them a new sense of hope that did motivate then into the political process. To these people I can only and simply say, good for you.

Because in my mind, Clinton does not equal Bush, we were better off during the Clinton administration than we have been in a long time, Bill Clinton’s indiscretion had nothing to do with his capability (or Hillary’s) in running the country, it was always going to be harder for Hillary Clinton to be taken seriously in her run for the presidency, I do believe Hillary Clinton to be incredibly brilliant, and call me crazy, but I do believe Sen. Clinton to be sincere in her quest to work for me.

Because, in my humble opinion, I would say that Sen. Obama would have benefited greatly if he had watched a bit of Sen. Clinton’s dance moves, before he decided he wanted to cut in.

It isn’t entitlement that I am pointing to with Sen. Clinton, but it is more about loyalty and blessed assurance. Which is something I think people will seek in Sen. McCain if Sen. Clinton is not nominated.

If Sen. Obama brought you here, by all means dance with him, but until our swan song officially ends, I’ll be dancing the political night away, with a Clinton.

Sincerely,
Still Clinton 08’

Side Note:

I think if Obama loses to McCain in the general that we shouldn't look to race, but inexperience. My parents both voted for Hillary, as well as most of my relatives, but they will be voting for McCain if Hillary doesn't get it. I am unsure as to who I will be voting for if Hillary doesn't win, and the reason is simply experience. I do like Obama, despite Rev. Wright and the like, but I am uneasy about voting for him. Obama can have all the good intentions in the world, but if he doesn’t know how to get them realized then what’s it all about?

Before this whole thing started I figured Obama's candidacy would give him more name recognition, but that Clinton would still win the nomination with no problem. Ha. I also thought that the Republican party's only chance at winning the presidency again would be with John McCain--well, they listened, no matter how hard it was for them. I hope we don't forget, that Dems liked McCain so much in 2004 that many were willing to add him on the ticket as Vice President. McCain may be running as a republican, but I still remember the days when a lot of democrats viewed him as a moderate. This is very much; still a democratic year, but Hillary’s base is riddled with these so-called swing voters. So, what I am saying is, we shouldn’t be too surprised if a significant amount of them go to the GOP in the fall. Hillary Clinton has managed to capture a prime piece of the voting block needed to win the presidency, and until we change the Electoral College, we should not be foolish enough to send them back.

Still Clinton 08'

Reader Comments
  
This is a nice post
By illinoismel Apr 29th 2008 at 1:03 am EDT
It really is.

I am a proud supporter of the Honorable Senator, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
  
Compare
By Matty Apr 29th 2008 at 1:03 am EDT
When she was asked she said she was not ready.

When Obama was asked the same question the first year in the US Senate he said, he was not ready.

another comparison ..... she didn't because she was not ready, he did anyway.
  
State Power vs Church
By Unknown user Apr 29th 2008 at 1:58 am EDT
Since when do politicians tell the Church when to critisize them? Whatever happened to 'In God we trust'?
Mrs Clinton is showing that she is not the right choice for this season.The World has changed significantly since the Clintons were in office. Not only are we facing natural disasters(flooding, earthquakes food shortages etc.) but a strong possibility of another world war.Enabling the obliteration of Iran!Oh, don't forget Lebanon, Syria and Palestine to come. The world needs a rest from wars to deal with the impending natural disasters. Pastors are supposed to chide wayward leaders and errant politicians, ala John The Baptist.We need to spend more time reading the Bible. By the way is Mrs Clinton a Christian and a regular church goer? It's time for a change.
Re: State Power vs Church
By True Blue Apr 29th 2008 at 2:01 am EDT
Its time for you to "change" your name.
And your mind.

Clinton 08 !
  
That was a really wonderful post
By jb1985 Apr 29th 2008 at 2:03 am EDT
"I think if Obama loses to McCain in the general that we shouldn't look to race, but inexperience."

I loved that phrase for it is oh so true......
Those that have made this about race are really really wrong.

And oh yes......Hillary for me and mine.....

Hillary "08
  
Torching the building
By JMesserly Apr 29th 2008 at 3:37 am EDT
Remind me again why the guy with all the inexperience whupped Hillary again?

Why is it that she is the one firing her top aides, she is the one with a campaign in debt and clutching at the most delusional scenarios for victory?

Maybe Obama is simply more competent that Hillary will ever be. Maybe the Clinton folks just won't accept the fact their candidate was simply second best.

Sorry, it's over. Turn out the light when you are through flaming everything under the sun for your defeat. Just don't torch the party. We have work to do when you guys pack up your sour grapes.
Re: Torching the building
By JessSkidoo Apr 29th 2008 at 4:28 am EDT
"Remind me again why the guy with all the inexperience whupped Hillary again?" --Dem. in Honolulu, HI

First I would say, he has not "whooped" Hillary Clinton, this race is extremely close.

Second, sometimes you've got to fire people who aren't doing a good job, and hire those who are capable. It's hard, but at least she did it, instead of keeping them because she didn't want to look bad. That's accountability!

Third, if your trying to build support for Sen. Obama IF he receives the nomination, I'd advise tact in your manner of speech. Because, quite honestly, bad sports-manship makes it really hard for me to like your candidate.

Whether the light is on or off,

Still Clinton 08'
Re: Torching the building
By JMesserly Apr 29th 2008 at 11:49 am EDT
Close??? Sorry, if it was anyone else but Clinton, the media would be laughing. It is over dude. The democratic party is not in a million years going to reverse the popularly elected delegates.

The consequences are that not just for this election, but a generation of black voters will simply not show up for democratic candidates.

Call it what you will, that's just a practical fact. It's delusional that somehow a reversal of the pledged delegates at the convention would have any other outcome.
  
Great Post...
By Darlene (DEC) Apr 29th 2008 at 4:47 am EDT
Thank you for sharing your thoughts.

Keep the faith
  
Before this whole thing... Oh the media concocted thing?
By Ray Pairan Apr 29th 2008 at 6:51 am EDT
Hi friends,

The powerful business elite have been busy spinning Rev. Wright's speech into something sinister. It was anything but divisive or sinister in fact I found it to be a very interesting enlightening conveyance of ideas that I was totally unfamiliar with prior to hearing it.

Per my post - we need to think for ourselves!

...Right Thought...

Right thought sharks tied to the continuation of this dysfunctional economic society are swimming the communication 'oceans' ready to strike at the first sign of 'wrong' creative thought that might disrupt the social consciousness of the global populous. Any deviation from your constant drool of 'free market' propaganda feed by a media, government, and civil society that has morphed into a reflection of the powerful business elite must be terminated. Conveying concepts, ideas, or theories that could conceivably disrupt the finely balanced totalitarian 'free market' economic society would place in jeopardy the illusion of equity conveyed by the purveyors of distortion who daily feed the working class their compliance drivel.

Distort, remove from context, embellish through the infusion of concepts not even relevant to the central topic or theory - these are tactics used by the 'right thought' sharks that have a vested interest in the continuation of their prejudicial attitudes. They attempt to move thought from centrality towards their extreme distorted embellished reflexive points raising the shroud of illusion once again over reality. Make certain that nothing penetrates this illusion of stability - nothing. Not even the hunger pains of a child that will die from malnutrition on a fore night, an elderly person on a fixed income who is unable to pay her electricity bill, a worker whose lost his job to a foreigner that was legally brought into the country by a corporation bereft of a soul, a single mother who is working 3 jobs just to pay the bills - no one must convey this reality.

Keep the general global public off focus, divided, but most of all quiet - any break away from the controlled pathways will not be tolerated by the keepers of the societal 'right thought' cannons.

No, we must scream
No, we must write
No, we must think
No, we must protest voicing a forceful No More.

There will be No More acquiescence within a totalitarian economic society that values nothing but money - nothing but uncontrolled greed. We cannot substitute our creative thought for their spoiled compliant heartless machine machinations.

Read, converse, discuss, but more importantly decide for yourselves - don't let anyone decide for you what you know to be reality. Fight, protest, move the world from it's intolerance of dissent towards economic justice for all!

Peace to the most wonderful group of human beings - my fellow Democrats!

Have a wonderful day! Keep thinking, fighting, but most importantly believing in a change that is just around the bend.

Ray Pairan Jr.