Please Americans, put down your flags long enough to remember 9/11 correctly
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.

Remember Especially the Aftermath for those who Survived

First, of course, we should remember and honor the lives of all who died in that tragedy, the victims as well as the heroes who died that day and in that rememberance, let us also remember the living who were left behind. And let us remember as we wave our American flags and declare the pledge of allegiance how this Republican Administration has treated them:

From a February 26, 2008 Article by Mike Hall:
http://blog.aflcio.org/2008/02/26/911-first-responders-protest-bush-health-care-funding-cuts/

“Today, three weeks after President Bush cut health care funding by 77 percent for Sept. 11 first responders, many of whom are developing serious and deadly illnesses because of their work at Ground Zero, some 200 9/11 workers rallied on Capitol Hill this morning, calling on Congress to restore the health care money.

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health estimates the cost of treating Ground Zero workers is about $218 million year and is expected to grow as the workers’ illnesses worsen and as more firefighters, police officers, emergency medical technicians and rescue and recovery workers develop Ground Zero-related diseases.

Last year, Congress appropriated $108 million toward health care for 9/11 workers, but in his fiscal 2009 budget, Bush cut that by 77 percent—to $25 million. Also last year, as part of an emergency spending bill, Congress approved an additional $50 million for first responder health care.

Shortly before Bush’s cuts were announced, a White House spokesman told reporters the president’s budget would “reflect his continued commitment to World Trade Center workers.” Interpret that as you wish–but I have one word for it: Republican newspeak. If you want more of the same: Vote for McCain and Palin.

*********************



And let us remember as we wave our American flags and declare the pledge of allegiance just exactly how cynically this Republican Administration has used this tragedy as a cause Célèbre to promote their own brand of right-wing ideology and hate–not only against the people of the United States, but against the people of the world.

Instead of labeling this horrid incident for what it was–a group of misguided thugs who committed a dastardly deed against innocent citizens of the United States of America, they fanned the fires of hatred and prejudice by declaring war against an entire religous sect of the world and lumping them all into the same category of these thugs. It would be the equivalent of saying that all Methodists are a “nation” and that because Timothy McVie (had he been a Methodist) blew up the Federal Center in Oklahoma City that we now label all Methodists as “terrorists” and declare war against them. This is EXACTLY what we have allowed this Republican Administration to do and all Americans should be ashamed for it. It is a wrong that needs to be righted.

*********************
And let us remember as we wave our American flags and the pledge of allegiance the full extent that this Republican Administration has used 9/11 as a cause Célèbre to start a horrible war in a nation that had nothing whatsoever to do with this horrible attack. And, let us remember how this Republican Administration’s irresponsible response to this horrible attack has emboldened right-wing mililary governments such as those of President Alvaro Uribe of Colombia as an excuse to murder people in his country who opposed the entrenchment of multinational corporations in their country.

The aftermath of 9/11 has been brutal for Colombian unions and social organizations. Right-wing paramilitary groups, emboldened by the Bush administration’s “declaration of war on terrorists” gave the courage to broaden the definition of “terrorist” to include anyone who stood in their way. On October 19, only a month after 9/11, Colombian security agents conducted raids aroudn the country, targeting the leadership of the United Union of Workers (USO).

In his acceptance speech, John McCain vowed, among other things, to “fight union leaders.”

Union leaders may be Senator McCain’s “enemy” and the enemy of multinational corporations, but workers of the world would disagreee.

MORE OF THE SAME REPUBLICAN RIGHT-WING STORY?
OR SHALL WE NOT ONLY TURN THE PAGE, BUT PUT THAT BOOK DOWN--for our sakes and for the sakes of those who come after us.


Reader Comments
  
Not its roll.
By snakelips Sep 7th 2008 at 12:50 am EDT (Updated Sep 7th 2008 at 12:50 am EDT)
It's not the roll of the federal gov't to provide healthcare. It's unconstitutional. That power belongs to the states.

-snakelips
Re: Not its sliced bread.
By Bill Dickson Sep 7th 2008 at 8:13 am EDT (Updated Sep 7th 2008 at 8:13 am EDT)
If it were "unconstitutional" we would not have medicare and Bush would have vetoed the "unconstitutional" bill to provide healthcare to the 911 workers, rather than slash it to the point of being worthless.

and it's role, not roll
Re: Not its sliced bread.
By snakelips Sep 7th 2008 at 11:23 am EDT (Updated Sep 7th 2008 at 11:23 am EDT)
Oops! Sorry about the typo.

I'm saying that we should NOT have medicare and Bush should NOT have signed the bill to provided healthcare to 911 workers. I understand the desire to help, but I don't think it's role the federal gov't should assume. The constitution specifically lays out what powers it has and providing healthcare is not one of them.

I feel that just because it is happening, doesn't make it right. And the more powers you give to the federal gov't the less direct control of those issues we have.

-snakelips
Re: Not its sliced bread.
By snakelips Sep 7th 2008 at 11:36 am EDT (Updated Sep 7th 2008 at 11:36 am EDT)
Sorry for the further typos!

-snakelips
Re: Not its sliced bread.
By Tonya Sep 7th 2008 at 11:39 am EDT (Updated Sep 7th 2008 at 11:39 am EDT)
Snake,
The misconception is that the average American dislikes the size of government; they just want a government that's sensitive to their needs. The American people don't want a government that gives tax cuts that are a hundred times larger for millionaires than for middle income families. They don't want a government that doesn't cut domestic spending to offset defense increases, turned large projected surpluses into large deficits, that adds about five million more Americans into poverty, and promote policies that provided the slowest job growth of any administration in over seventy years.
Re: Not its sliced bread.
By Arbitrary Antonym Sep 7th 2008 at 5:12 pm EDT (Updated Sep 7th 2008 at 5:12 pm EDT)
And in whose hands does that control then subsequently reside? Free market economics does not solve all ills.

Private industry meddles in the law, it then follows that the law aught to meddle in private industry. CEO's are not honorable or sensible just because we would like them to be.

At least politicians can be replaced.
Re: Not its roll.
By Jacob Clark Sep 7th 2008 at 10:32 am EDT (Updated Sep 7th 2008 at 10:32 am EDT)
The role of the federal government is to provide for the welfare of the people. By your logic, Snakelips, the role of the federal government is not to provide for the Elderly (Social Security) nor to provide national parks, as they are on state land. Get real.
Re: Not its roll.
By snakelips Sep 7th 2008 at 11:34 am EDT (Updated Sep 7th 2008 at 11:34 am EDT)
Providing for the general welfare of the people, as written in the constitution, is not intended to be used to provide everything for the people. And certainly it was not intended to provide healthcare, housing, food, etc. I mean, where does it stop? Tax payer provided electricity, cars, cable TV, internet, furniture, shampoo, and on and on? This path leads us down the road to socialism/communism or worse. And most importantly, doing these things robs us of our power, which IS a specific intention of the constitution.

-snakelips
Re: Not its roll.
By Mike Barack Hussein Sep 7th 2008 at 3:27 pm EDT (Updated Sep 7th 2008 at 3:27 pm EDT)
And exactly what IS wrong with socialism when it is properly applied?

Probably less is wrong with it than capitalism when it is applied improperly as with the neocons.
  
Great post Liz
By Jacob Clark Sep 7th 2008 at 10:34 am EDT (Updated Sep 7th 2008 at 10:34 am EDT)
well-thought, well-reasoned and a needed reminder of the travesty of government in its response to the tragedy of 9/11.
  
Islamic Extremism Does Exist
By Frank Lynch Sep 7th 2008 at 10:38 am EDT (Updated Sep 7th 2008 at 10:38 am EDT)
Iran's population is 66,000,000, entirely Shiia, lead by a zealot fanatic priest whom every day preaches "death to America and everybody in it."

Liz, I like you, but you cannot let your ideology blind you to facts.

I agree it is wrong to lump all Muslims together, and I join you in despising senseless prejudice, and I welcome and appreciate our Muslim fellow citizens.

Further, i appreciate their embarassment by the actions of the Extremists.

But that cannot blind us to the fact that there are more than 100,000,000 Islamic Fundamentalists Extremists who seriously support murdering Americans just because we are Americans.

Now I fully expect to hear ranting about why they hate us, and I truly believe that we must accomplish CHANGE

Nonetheless, there ARE 100,000,000 Islamic Fundamentalist Extremists who wish us death and dismemberment.
  
Methodists
By Mike Barack Hussein Sep 7th 2008 at 3:23 pm EDT (Updated Sep 7th 2008 at 3:23 pm EDT)
I believe McVeigh was of a faith more like Sarah Palin. I'm not kidding.

BUT he could have been Methodist. There are plenty of nuts for all the religious faiths to share.