|
|
| Also listed in: 127 groups |
Tags: Censorship, democratic convention, elections, Frank Lynch, Free Speech, national security, Obama, presidential campaigns, the economy
Who is crazy?
Comments on previous posts have stooped to the politics of personal destruction, ad hominem attacks, and calling people "crazy."
Did you know that shortly after Frank filed with the FEC there was a staff post, since deleted, on Daily Kos, asking if Kos should support Frank instead of Obama? So the Kos staff was taking him seriously.
Tell me, who is crazy?
Frank Lynch is creating a new university http://www.fluni.com to train teachers of science, math, medicine and engineering to help treat our national shortage of science teachers and had the audacity to name the university after his father, who died at home in his arms.
Obviously Lynch is crazy, a loon, an egomanic and should be chased out of town. It goes against the principles of the Democratic Party to advance education and to deal with the teacher shortage. Drive Lynch away from posting, he is dangerous. And he is taking on the monumental, back breaking tsask of creating a non-profit, charitable university, and serving without compensation? What a jerk!
Frank Lynch is creating a public charity devoted to abused children and abused women and to fighting poverty inside of America as opposed to Clinton's foundation which is mostly outside the USA. http://franklynchfoundation.org also named after his deceased father.
Lynch is insane, What a narcissist. Anybody who wants to fight poverty inside America is a Nazi. Shout him down, ban him, ridicule him. And he wants to help abused children and save them from the broken foster care system? He can't possible be a true Democrat.
Lynch is writing books and creating a publishing company to raise money for his charities to help education and fight poverty in America. Criminal! UnAmerican. Anti-Democrat. No Democrat Presidential candidate ever wrote a book? Boo! Go away Frank. It is illegal to write a book.
Frank filed to run for president even though he knew the Democratic Party insiders would not let him on the ballots. Why? As a means of getting the other Presidential candidates to copy the ideas he posted on http://www.franklynch.org and use them in their previously vacant websites previously filled with only empty rhetoric from Jimmy Carter's 1976 campaign, and we know Carter's legacy.
Gee Frank, you reminded Hillary and goaded Barack into helping college students and into adopting Universal Healthcare. Frank, you really are a tin hat wacko loon. Everybody knows that Hillary and Barack adopted universal healthcare AFTER you publicized it and nagged the Chairpersons of all 50 state party organizations about it. What a maroone.
And by doing so, Frank Lynch changed America. What a terrible person! Pushing for universal healthcare and helping college students. Lock him in jail.
And Frank Lynch filed to run for President without ever serving as a legislator.
Now this is a big one. Frank Lynch is going to propose a Constitutional Amenment to forbid anyone who has ever been a US Senator or Representative, or ever graduated from law school, from running for President.
No lawyer ever SUCCESSFULLY managed anything of substance in the entire history of America. No many of you will cite lawyers who were the head of all sorts of things. Yes, ABraham Lincoln, my geatest personal hero, was a lawyer, but he never went to law school. Ha! Try to focus. No lawyer evere SUCCESSFULLY managed anything of substance.
Chew on that! First it is a really big crime how so many Senators do nothing about carrying out their duties to the taxpayers for two whole years while they abandon the Senate to run for President.
Second, the Presidency is EXECUTIVE. Senators and Representatives do nothing but work to get re-elected and collect campaign donations by holding hearing after hearing after hearing after hearing to extort contributions from the victims of their hearings.
Third, have you every watched CSPAN? None of those bums should ever be allowed to be President.
Frank Lynch has expert experience in the areas that determine America's future: science, national security, finance/economics, and running a business. See http://www.franklynch.name
In fact, compared to the irrelevant experience of all the other candidates, Lynch is OVERQUALIFIED
Frank Lynch at age 18 dropped out of college because he thought his professors were stupid. At age 19 he was back as a National Science Foundation researcher studying the effects of early experience on adult biochemical and hormonal reactions to stress.
Since stress is involved in weapons systems, he was recruited as a national security consultant, first on selection of advanced weapons systems, then intellegence, and he co-authored a study that predicted the current MidEast situation, in detail, with 100 percent accuracy, 40 years ago! Current candidates don't even understand the MidEast today, let alone see the future.
He then spent 10 years as a Corporate Finance Officer on Wall Street, followed by creating a new business from scratch, building it up into a publicly traded company, and selling it to a larger company.
In contrast, both Obama and McCain state they do not understand business, finance or the economy.
No other Presidential candidate has these comprehensive, totally relevant, qualifications to deal with the problems facing America today.
Maybe Howard Dean erred by keeping Frank Lynch off the primary ballots? Would it not be interesting if the voters had had the chance to debate this?
Two states, including Clinton's New York, refused to even accept delivery of my applications when they saw my return address on the certified mail.
The fact is the Democratic Party is not.
The State Chairpersons, in enough states to make it impossible to get nominated without being on the ballot in those states, have arbitrary, unqualified, absolute authority to keep any candidate off the ballot without having to give a reason.
Every one of those states refused to let the voters debate these issues. Therefore it would have been pointless to run national television ads, or to collect petitions in the other states.
A handful of Democrat Party State Chairpersons have absoult control over which Democrats can run for President.
The Democratic Party is not.
How about changing things so someone who is not a Senator or Representative or billionaire can get on the ballots?
I had the resources to run a national campaign, but when certain State Chairs exercise Stalin/China style censorship over ballot access, they stifle freedom of speech.
When Hillary and Obama keep saying anybody can run for President, they ARE LYING
I continue to maintain that I am overqualified compared to the Party insider hacks who comprisied the only candidates Howard Dean let onto the ballot and the debates.
The Democratic Party is not.
The top ten list on the bottom of the first page at Link puts to shame the obsolete platforms of all 17 establishment candidates who were allowed into the debates, including the two final candidates.
The voters should have been allowed to discuss this.
It's not like the other candidates were NOT going to include universal healthcare, education, green issues in their policy platforms until YOU thought of it?
I'm sorry you did not manage to get on the ballot in most states, but let's face it, unless you have name recognition you really need to be at the forefront of politics to get noticed. The other downside, of course, is that you have to have money to run for President, or at least a big enough number of people who will give you enough money (subject to legal limits) to make and run ads, travel around the country, shake hands and kiss babies. We like the idea of grassroots campaigning in this party, but the reality is, even the leanest campaign needs bags of money to sustain itself in American politics today.
Frank, you seem like a really decent man. And you seem to care deeply about a lot of the same things as me and most others here. But this party has a nominee (official) and now he needs all of us Democrats to quit messing around and give him 100% support. Because all those things you mention on your website that you would like to do for this country, we Democrats would like to do and John McCain will never even consider if he is elected. Remember why you left the Republican Party?
And I know a thing or two about pretentions. I often kid with my friends: "the only difference between me and God is I just THINK I know everything!". It's not something I would ever say if I was running for political office, though!
Like Obama, Frank was active in a church basement, but focused on children by creating and operating a multi-ethnic preschool in a Chicago church basement. While Frank was working in the church basement, his Pastor's daughter was killed in the final shootout with the Symbionese Liberation Army. Before they employed Michelle and Barack, Sidley & Austin did the law work for Frank's preschool.
You are reflecting the huge difference in perception of what a President should do.
The President is the Chief Executive as well as the Commander in Chief.
What all the recent Presidents failed to perform, and with which none of the candidates have any experience, is setting the direction of the Nation. And one of the most important directions is the economy and business.
American business needs direction to re-orient it towards including the good of the nation, not just profit. Profits made from shifting jobs to Red China are not as good as profits made in Alabama.
The difference I have with Obama is that making companies into non-profits (which is what happens when you think large profits are wrong and should be subject to a special tax) is a completely different issue from guiding companies into helping the nation in addition to making profits.
The simplest way to do this is with the Abraham Lincoln 47 percent tax on imports, while eliminating all income taxes.
Thank you for changing the dialogue more towards ideas.
I believe that you should have actual concrete plans BEFORE you run for President, as opposed to campaigning for seven months and relying on millions of dollars of polls before you take positions that polls tell you what people want to hear.
They had not just seven months, they had the many years that they really spent planning to run to have real issues.
Because I used hyperbole to show how ridiculous and anti-Democratic Party principles are your and your friends' scurilous, irrational and rabies-laden attacks on a person who dedicates his life to doing good works?
And does them without compensation?
Shame on you.
I recommend you learn the principles of the Democratic Party.