What more do you want?
|
|
I watched and commented as many of you trashed Senator Clinton, I watched as many of you said you would never vote for her, I watched as many of you said you would withhold any monies if they were going to pay off her campaign debt and yet today I see some of you saying Hillary will rip her (meaning the new Rep. VP candidate) to pieces. What makes you think this is Hillary's job?
Senator Clinton is Senator Clinton now, campaigning for the Democratic nominee. Why is it necessary to bring her up? Why does this party still involve Senator Clinton? How about Governor Richardson ripping into the new Republican VP candidate or Sen. Edwards? But better yet, how about the Honorable Nancy Pelosi taking a stand against this person in waiting?
Senator Clinton is Senator Clinton now, campaigning for the Democratic nominee. Why is it necessary to bring her up? Why does this party still involve Senator Clinton? How about Governor Richardson ripping into the new Republican VP candidate or Sen. Edwards? But better yet, how about the Honorable Nancy Pelosi taking a stand against this person in waiting?


I've ALWAYS stated that I would support Hillary if she was the nominee, and have sent a good sum of money to help retire her debts.
Really, as a fervent Hillary supporter you should be really insulted that mcCain has the gaul to try to replace Hillary with Palin to Hillary die hards. She stands for everything that Hillary stood against, The only thing Hillary and Palin have in commone is some body parts.
It really is sad this race is still about sex. Now McCain is playing the sexism card to woo voters.
What do Democrats want? We want all hands on board to win. That includes Hillary. Winning is in the best interest of the country.
And now, when everyone was saying this election was not about sexism, you now are saying it is by virtue of Senator McCain picking a woman the election is about sex?
The whole point of my post is Senator Clinton is just that, Senator Clinton, the Honorable Senator from New York. It is not up to her to fight this Republican Governor, yet many here seem to still want to involve her. This fight is up to Senators Obama and Biden, not Senator Clinton. The trashing going on right now here on this site is sexism, not politics. Attack her politics if you must, but leave the sexism out of it. You only feed the Republican party by bringing sex into it, but I guess you all are smart enough to know that.
But I've been on since about 10am and read most everything...and nothing stands out.
Except Terry constantly ruining everybody's posts by saying we didn't pick Hillary and its now up to Joe....on posts that had nothing to do with our ticket. Maybe people were just pissed at him and threw something out...but once I see somebody doing what he does...I start ignoring the responses to him (or is terry a female. I never know on this site).
The point was, McCain insulted Hillary. Here's how: Hillary put many hours, blood, sweat and tears into working as a Congresswoman, then even harder work into her campaign. She's out, but McCain had the audacity to take an inexperienced woman from outside the realm and put all his trust and keys in to her hands. What message is he sending? That he thought women should have a chance? If he did, why didn't he vet a woman NOT under investigation of interfering in a 2 yr old divorce case? Of if his message was flipping a bird at Hillary, he used the wrong finger! What's wrong with his head, he's been attacking BO forever on "WHO is he?" and "Why didn't he take Hillary?" What a hypocrite. I'm gonna scream "WHO" is she? (Well, I know exactly who she is and what she does, I share the same state and see her often. It's wasted debate on McC's part. I felt Hillary was strong and experienced, I don't feel Sarah has experience to make her strong contender (I know her), but the country does not, she's in your face to climb to the top at all cost, wants the lime light on her. She's worse than Bush and McCain combined. Creepy. Sorry you don't see the connection.
zzzzz nite.
Then there will be a debate between Obama and McC.
I keep seeing media mix something up,it goes like this: They say Palin has.... blah, blah, blah over Obama. It's NOT between Palin and Obama; rather, it's between Palin and Biden (she loses), either way, either guy, she loses. But you can't put a VP from opposition against our running president and the media is getting by with that because the GOP planted that seed.
Now, you are also bringing in generational issues? Ok, so you don't want us old women anymore either? So be it. God how I do so love this party building.
My personal favorite was Barbara Jordan. Somehow I always thought she might become the first woman prez.
What John McCain showed today is that he will use womna to obtain the presidency. He is not standing up for woman..he picked a far right extreme woman to appease his base.
LPD, you open yourself up to someone ready to argue but I am not going to do it because you simply aren't worth being banned for. I think the Republicans are already running ads that Hillary and Joe Biden both said the same thing about Obama - I don't live in a swing state so I haven't seen them but it is in the press.
Oh, it's a lady... I'm a lady too. Let's vote for his choice?
Yes, I suggested that McCain is shallow. What vetting could have possibly gone on here, considering the other choices he had? Romney? Pawlenty? Jindal?
The election is between McCain/Palin and Obama/Biden.
It is not against Hillary Clinton