Post from I'm Angry:
Colbert for...What, Exactly?
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
I know, there have already been posts about Mr. Colbert running for President. But what do you all think about this? I'm kind of split, myself.

On one hand, I want to be amused. Steve Colbert is running for President. Just saying that makes you laugh. I can't believe he's actually taking it this far, even if he is only running in South Carolina. The man is hilarious, and you have to love his satire style. Running on both sides? He'd better hurry up and have a sex scandal so he can assimilate himself into the Republican party.

On the other (more serious) hand, I am offended. He's making a mockery of the POTUS elections and obviously does not actually care about solving problems in our country or mending foreign policy, et cetera. Not to mention, all of the voters out there who don't take the election too seriously and will vote for Colbert are probably going to be Democrats, no? If he keeps this up, he could take votes away from the Democratic candidate. Not that it would matter because of the damned electoral college, but anyway.

I'm interested in hearing what the other Presidential hopefuls will have to say about this...Who here would seriously consider voting for Colbert?

Thoughts?

Laria

Link

Reader Comments
  
Re: What, exactly?
By Paul Thompson Oct 17th 2007 at 3:29 pm EDT
Colbert is a serious about a presidential bid as were Pat Paulson and Snoopy. Anyone who votes for such a candidate would otherwise not vote.

Who knows? Maybe while voting for Colbert they'll cast a vote for the Democratic candidate for dog catcher. Win-win.
  
Party Contempt for Democratic Principles
By Frank Lynch Oct 17th 2007 at 3:47 pm EDT
If you think Colbert has contempt for the Democratic principles of the Presidential elections, he is no worse than our own Democratic party has become.

Nowhere in our Party's treatment of Presidential candidates or Presidential processes is there any consideration of the ideals that our party is supposed to stand for.

Our Party now merely bows and scrapes on the floor to cater to the candidates who have prostituted themselves to collect the most money.

Our Party selection should be based on the ideas, proposals and plans of the candidates, not on the highest pile of bribe money gained by selling out principles.

Our party spits in the face of the one and only candidate who truly has the action plan with actual steps to fulfill our liberal progressive principles.

Compare the Top Ten List at www.franklynch.org to the rehashed "Oh so 20th Century obsolete baloney" with which all the other candidates insult our intelligence.

Except for www.franklynch.org, all the other candidates are only repeating the rhetoric from the 1970's, repeating promises which they have broken again and again.

Can't we wake up and get rid of the proven liars, of the candidates who have never delivered, and choose a new and better future?

Contribute at www.franklynch.org
Re: Party Contempt for Democratic Principles
By Laria S. Oct 17th 2007 at 3:50 pm EDT
Um...
I think we went a little off topic here.

:)
  
He's Funny
By Asher Heimermann Oct 17th 2007 at 3:57 pm EDT
I think he is funny.
Re: He's Funny
By Laria S. Oct 17th 2007 at 4:00 pm EDT
But what do you think about his potentially affecting the elections, even if just by a small amount?
  
antidotes
By Jim Callahan Oct 17th 2007 at 4:06 pm EDT
Colbert is the perfect antidote to states that take themselves too seriously, like Iowa; while Gore is perfect for states that are not taken seriously enough, like Michigan.

Of course, if a Democratic presidential candidate wins in Florida (a state whose demographics looks like America) they can probably win nationwide.

In November?
The saddest memory I have of 2000 is coming in for the recount, slightly hung over at noon the day after the election day. One of the first orders of business was counting and reading out loud the write in votes. I winced at every vote for Mickey Mouse....

Jim Callahan
Orlando, FL
Re: antidotes
By Laria S. Oct 17th 2007 at 4:18 pm EDT
Shit.

I'd at least choose Colbert over Mickey Mouse.
Re: antidotes
By Robert Donovan Oct 17th 2007 at 5:20 pm EDT
Amen. If all the joke votes had been cast for real candidates, the outcome of the election may have been different.

And what a world of different the world would be.
  
I'm not made at Colbert
By Liz Oct 17th 2007 at 4:30 pm EDT
I don't know. But I'm not mad at him, that's for sure. Should he actually win a primary it could point out perhaps to legislators in a way that we the people have not been able to as to how disgusted we are with the continued war in Iraq. Congress was given a mandate from the people last November and that was to get the H out of Iraq NOW. Not in two years, not in 20 years but NOW. So far we have been ignored as they continue, for all their huffing and puffing to give Bush his money to be distributed not to the American people .
  
Senator Colbert (R-WY)
By Robert Donovan Oct 17th 2007 at 5:25 pm EDT
I like the thought of his candidacy, but why not run for something where he has a real chance of winning and little chance of tipping the scale, like for senator from a very, very Red state, like WYoming, and of course, as a Republican?

I would love to see him give Mike Enzi a primary...
  
Stephen's Sex Scandal and more
By Daniel Kennedy Oct 18th 2007 at 2:16 am EDT
Jane Fonda is all over Colbert every chance she gets, that's all the sex scandal Stephen needs. And the only votes he's going to take away from any democrat are absent minded Clinton votes.

Besides, isn't he running in South Carolina ONLY?
Re: Stephen's Sex Scandal and more
By Laria S. Oct 18th 2007 at 7:46 am EDT
Yes. Yes, he is. I hope you're right about his taking away Clinton votes...