John Edwards and Al Gore
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
Of the three Senators..... Hillary Clinton is the most Environmentally friendly.

That would speak volumes to Al Gore.
Both, McCain and Obama embrace nuclear energy expansion.
It takes 25,000 years for the radio active waste products to decompose to be safe.
What kind of container does that require? The whole state of Nevada?
Hillary Clinton is not in favor of nuclear energy expansion and she has voted "NO" 7 times on the energy bill for nuclear
expansion. Obama and McCain have voted "Yes".


The mother of invention is...necessity...need.. If we switch over to nuclear, without addressing the problems
of the waste materials, we will only be pushing our
problems of need....down the road gathering more
problems along the way. Clearly Hillary does not want to delay in addressing these problems. You know what?
We do not either.
She wants real Science and real Research brought back to our Universities to deal with problems such as this and to stay competitive in the world.

John Edwards......his passion for poverty and Universal Health Care is the real deal, as he is the real deal. He knows that his plan and his battle for UHC is alive and the battle continues with Clinton and not with Obama.

So, both, John Edwards and Al Gore hold back .... for now, I think these reasons may be part of it.
I also know they will support whoever is the Nominee.

I continue to hold my breath, hoping that Edwards will give his pledged delegates to Clinton based on UHC, along with other considerations needed to take back the White House in the General Election.

She is the right one.......

It is not now or never for Obama, it never has been.

Hillary Clinton ..2008 Barack Obama... 2016

We will need the keys to the White House for 16 years to clean up the mess that Bush is leaving us.
We can have it........ in this order.

Hillary Clinton... 2008.. Barach Obama..2016

John Edwards......his passion for poverty and Universal Health Care is the real deal, as he is the real deal. He knows that his plan and his battle for UHC is alive and the battle continues with Clinton and not with Obama.

So, both, John Edwards and Al Gore hold back .... for now, I think these reasons may be part of it.
I also know they will support whoever is the Nominee.

I continue to hold my breath, hoping that Edwards will give his pledged delegates to Clinton based on UHC, along with other considerations needed to take back the White House in the General Election.

She is the right one.......

It is not now or never for Obama, it never has been.

Hillary Clinton ..2008 Barack Obama... 2016

We will need the keys to the White House for 16 years to clean up the mess that Bush is leaving us.
We can have it........ in this order.

Hillary Clinton... 2008.. Barach Obama..2016

Reader Comments
  
sorry
By Matty May 14th 2008 at 6:20 am EDT
sorry for the stutter.... copied and paste and forgot to delete..... late......tried to us the extension
  
.
By annie b (mcliberal) May 14th 2008 at 6:27 am EDT
N O B A M A! clinton 08!
Re: .
By MCNoel May 14th 2008 at 6:53 am EDT
isn't there a women's rights march you're supposed to be at?
Re: .
By annie b (mcliberal) May 14th 2008 at 6:58 am EDT
sexist pig!
Re: .
By Matty May 14th 2008 at 7:02 am EDT
I like you annie
  
Nuclear energy
By Pale Rider May 14th 2008 at 6:47 am EDT
The big opposition to nuclear energy is the waste. You ask what size container that would require. Why should it require a container any large than, say, a filling station's underground tanks? That would fit very nicely into the space shuttle (or whatever we develop to replace them). We launch the shuttle, and once at altitude, give the container a boost toward the sun. End of story. It doesn't even have to be a special mission for only that purpose. It could be just another mission objective on the list of many.
Re: Nuclear energy
By MCNoel May 14th 2008 at 6:52 am EDT
yeah. but dude, these chicks don't know shit about nuclear energy. picture trying to explain it to a 13-year old version of you.
Re: Nuclear energy
By annie b (mcliberal) May 14th 2008 at 6:57 am EDT
you wanna throw down, you sexist pig? my man is a ten-year navy vet. he worked on nuclear submarines. then spent another 20 years working at a nuke plant. you think i don't understand nuclear energy? jerkweed....sexist......jerk.
Re: Nuclear energy
By Matty May 14th 2008 at 7:04 am EDT
I have had 10 years of College science.....so fo
Re: Nuclear energy
By Edison Carter May 14th 2008 at 7:27 am EDT
Why is it that Obamas brand of liberation theology excludes so many people? His vision fopr america only includes people who look, act and think as he does. That is probably not a good thing.
Re: Nuclear energy
By Matty May 14th 2008 at 7:00 am EDT
you have said what I have often thought.
Does that mean great minds?
Underground not good...... but out in space is a thought..... Moon..... but still 25,000 years is a long time.

Live for the moment....... why not.
I still like research to find a way to make it safe or at least reusable for more energy.
Re: Nuclear energy
By Matty May 14th 2008 at 7:06 am EDT
without the need...... the way will never happen.
Alternative Energy will be pushed when we are pushed to make it happen. Nuclear energy just feeds the monster and we get pushed down the road.
  
Hillary Is Actually Pro Nuclear Energy
By PA 5th Voter May 14th 2008 at 7:22 am EDT
Ooo, how about some sources & links...

Here's mine:

Link
Re: Hillary Is Actually Pro Nuclear Energy
By PA 5th Voter May 14th 2008 at 7:38 am EDT
Yeah I didn't see a pro nor a con stance on her site, either. John Edwards was against Nuclear energy from the beginning.
Re: Hillary Is Actually Pro Nuclear Energy
By Matty May 14th 2008 at 8:35 am EDT
read the post...... two different things.


April 1, 2008
Elizabeth Edwards takes aim at McCain health care plan and she has also criticized Barack Obama’s health care plan.
She has praised Hillary Clinton's proposal, saying that it resembles her husband's universal health care plan.

Link
Re: Hillary Is Actually Pro Nuclear Energy
By Matty May 14th 2008 at 8:38 am EDT
excellent...excellent..... she has vote no 7 times and as you see for this link .....
it is the problem with the waste.... not the problem that is is a excellent source for energy
Re: Hillary Is Actually Pro Nuclear Energy
By Matty May 14th 2008 at 8:43 am EDT
that was for PA voter......