Economy and energy
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
All to often Americans are spending vast amounts of blood and treasure on coal. Coal costs transportation, health care, and man hours to produce and use. Solar farms like the ones in Germany cost fewer man hours fewer health care costs and less transportation. Subsidizing this industry and protecting it from industrial dumping is worthwhile to Americans. We need to utilize our advantages one of our main advantages is the vast amount of unused land in the Southwest ideal for solar farming. People are moving there and one reason is to cut energy costs. Just think of acres and acres of solar farms soaking up the sun instead of tons of life threatening air pollution caused by coal burning. The South is the most populated region in the country yet their are large areas available especially in the Southwest ideal for solar farming. Subsidization is needed due to the low price of electricity which is the result of previous subsidy so it is not unfair competition. Companies like General electric should stop attempting to undo progress and lead.

Reader Comments
  
coal is certainly not the answer today
By Liz May 17th 2008 at 2:17 pm EDT
I read an excerpt from an MIT study a few weeks ago that predicted that the clean coal technology would not be ready until 2030.

And what about the mountain top slicing? That is horrible. Coal mining companies are forcing people out of their homes, slicing off the tops of mountains, polluting the rivers and water ways and the resulting deforestration is creating land erosion which in turn is destroying ecosystems and for what? for who?

FOR the coal companies, their executives and shareholders--not the people of Kentucky or West Virginia. Mountain top slicing not only reduces the beautiful mountains, it also reduces the jobs for people because not as many miners are needed.
Re: coal is certainly not the answer today
By Liz May 17th 2008 at 2:19 pm EDT
Re: coal is certainly not the answer today
By Michael Mullarkey May 17th 2008 at 2:46 pm EDT
The sad part is that none of that is really necessary it is just more convenient.
  
Robert Jr. wrote a book 5 years ago
By Hollywood May 17th 2008 at 3:18 pm EDT
called "Crimes Against Nature". Was that it, or is it a new book?
  
GE
By griffith May 17th 2008 at 3:25 pm EDT
GE does not bring good things, like solar energy, to life. They have bought up solar assets in the past and killed it with consolidated capital.

This is an organizational problem on the supply side, so that is the kind of soultion required.

Not is the deconsolidation of organized means in order, but the energy grid itself. Solar production should be a more localized practice in which the surplus is easily returned to the grid. Production does not have to be centralized, organized, into an exploitative entity easily manipulated by its mere ownership consolidated.

Amazing how the good Lord provides us with abundant energy literally in the bright light of day, yet we tend to just see the shadows of reality on the walls of our phenomenological cave.

Let us all bring good things to life. Who needs GE anyway?

Very best wishes.