Results of Bi-Partisan Troopergate Investigation With Link
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (CNN)

Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin abused her power as Alaska's governor by trying to get her ex-brother-in-law fired from the state police, a state investigator's report concluded Friday.

"Gov. Palin knowingly permitted a situation to continue where impermissible pressure was placed on several subordinates in order to advance a personal agenda," the report states.

Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan's refusal to fire State Trooper Mike Wooten from the state police force was "likely a contributing factor" to Monegan's July dismissal, but Palin had the authority as governor to fire him, the report by former Anchorage prosecutor Stephen Branchflower states.

However, it states that her efforts to get Wooten fired broke a state ethics law that bars public officials from pursuing personal interest through official action.The bipartisan Legislative Council, which commissioned the investigation after Monegan was fired, unanimously adopted the 263-page public report after a marathon executive session Friday.

About 1,000 more pages of documents compiled during the inquiry will remain confidential, the council's chairman, state Sen. Kim Elton, said.

Rep. John Coghill, a Republican who criticized the handling of the investigation, said it was "well-done professionally."But he said some of the conclusions were judgment calls by Branchflower, and recommended readers should view them with a "jaundiced eye."

Monegan said he was fired after refusing pressure to fire State Trooper Mike Wooten, who had gone through an acrimonious divorce and custody battle with Palin's sister.

Palin has repeatedly denied wrongdoing, describing Wooten as a "rogue trooper" who had threatened her family. Wooten denied the allegations.

At a campaign stop Thursday, Palin told reporters that she has "absolutely nothing to hide" in the investigation.The governor originally agreed to cooperate with the Legislative Council inquiry, and disclosed in August that her advisers had contacted Department of Public Safety officials nearly two dozen times regarding her ex-brother-in-law.

But when she became Sen. John McCain's running mate, her advisers began painting the investigation as a weapon of Democratic partisans.

Ahead of Friday's hearing, Palin supporters wearing clown costumes and carrying balloons denounced the investigation as a "kangaroo court" and a "three-ring circus" led by supporters of Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama.The state senator managing the investigation, Sen. Hollis French, fueled those complaints with a September 2 interview in which he warned the inquiry could yield an "October Surprise" for the GOP.

But Palin's lawyers already had begun pushing for the state Personnel Board to launch its own investigation, calling it the proper legal venue for the matter.

Reader Comments
  
.
By Patriot08 Oct 10th 2008 at 10:13 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 10:13 pm EDT)
  
I'm not impressed
By m.marsh Oct 10th 2008 at 10:17 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 10:17 pm EDT)
"I think there are some problems in this report," said Republican state Sen. Gary Stevens, a member of the panel. "I would encourage people to be very cautious, to look at this with a jaundiced eye."
Just more dirty politics.
unfortunately it's fact
By Patriot08 Oct 10th 2008 at 10:36 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 10:36 pm EDT)
ALL politicians are dirty.
Re: unfortunately it's fact
By WRM Oct 10th 2008 at 10:40 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 10:40 pm EDT)
Some much more than others. :)
Re: unfortunately it's fact
By Patriot08 Oct 10th 2008 at 10:43 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 10:43 pm EDT)
True WRM ;)
Re: unfortunately it's fact
By Piritlel Oct 10th 2008 at 10:42 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 10:42 pm EDT)
Not all politicians are dirty, that's an opinion we don't want to hear here.

Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.
Re: unfortunately it's fact
By Patriot08 Oct 10th 2008 at 10:45 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 10:45 pm EDT)
ALL politicians are dirty.
Re: unfortunately it's fact
By Piritlel Oct 10th 2008 at 11:05 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 11:05 pm EDT)
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.

So, if you think our incumbents are dirty, you know where the door is.
Re: unfortunately it's fact
By Patriot08 Oct 10th 2008 at 11:11 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 11:11 pm EDT)
Did anyone hear something?

I thought I heard foot stomping.

No. I think it was just a loon spamming a blog, yet again.

Politician = dirty. Just the extent of "dirty" varies.

Right WRM?

:)
Re: I'm not impressed
By Piritlel Oct 10th 2008 at 10:40 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 10:40 pm EDT)
It was a legislative body of REPUBLICANS...chosen by Sarah. LOL. It was bi-partisan. She IS dirty politics.

Then after the investigation got rolling, McCain bought her a whole team of people to cherry pick and spokespeople to crowd control.

Mark, Steve and I already wrote about the verdict, hours ago, it's even STILL posted here now: LOL
Link

Rep. Lynn LOST...and he'll lose his seat for wasting time and money on his effort to sue the Alaskan Supreme Court. He should be sanctioned for abusing power too.
  
O.K.
By Democrat in Covina, CA Oct 10th 2008 at 10:20 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 10:20 pm EDT)
Palin got it, but did the ass hole trooper get fired too. What a creep.
Re: O.K.
By Patriot08 Oct 10th 2008 at 10:41 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 10:41 pm EDT)
She may have taken advantage of her position. She didn't rein her husband in.

But only those that have suffered from domestic abuse may truly understand the feeling behind wanting Wooten fired and the fact that he SHOULD have been fired.

He HAS admitted, at the very least, to tasering his stepson. That alone should have been enough reason for Monegan to fire him.

It should have LEGALLY ended right there.
Re: O.K.
By m.marsh Oct 10th 2008 at 10:44 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 10:44 pm EDT)
I am completely in agreement with you. Too often police who are abusive at home are protected at their jobs. And that is just WRONG!
Re: O.K.
By Patriot08 Oct 10th 2008 at 10:48 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 10:48 pm EDT)
Agreed m.marsh!!

I have learned this is true personally.
Re: O.K.
By Piritlel Oct 10th 2008 at 11:14 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 11:14 pm EDT)
only a 20 day CPO.

It's pretty narrow minded to think people that haven't been abused would not understand.

He lost his job teaching tasing classes, he lost his post to investigation hunting violators, he lost his post in Wasilla.

I know this for a fact, that if you fire wrongfully, you can have a suite brought against the city and it's in the millions (tax payers don't want to have to pay for someone being fired wrongfully, or before they have exhausted the rules that apply for the particular job they have).

If you were caught on your job wasting time at Party Builder or writing letters to people about their former jobs and twisted their words, do you think you should be fired, or get a warning? According to your philosophy, you should be jailed. I think you're right. :o
Re: O.K.
By Patriot08 Oct 10th 2008 at 11:00 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 11:00 pm EDT)
Yeah.

Unfortunately, the "trooper" IS STILL a trooper.
Re: O.K.
By Patriot08 Oct 10th 2008 at 11:21 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 11:21 pm EDT)
Hmmmm.

I hear a nut rattling.

Paranoid and out of control.

Not to mention nobody knows what the nut is talking about?

Geez!
Re: O.K.
By Piritlel Oct 10th 2008 at 11:02 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 11:02 pm EDT)
1. Trooper Wooten isn't legislative personnel.

2. Trooper Wooten did suffer reprimands, (if you knew where Wasilla was and the distance to Anchorage, you'd know he had to do additional driving and explains why he sat for 45 min waiting outside for his children to come out of school).

3. Had you read his letter of reprimand, you'd know he did suffer a demotion, his job moved, he lost pay, turned in his badge, gun, and he will lose his job if one other violation. He too is suffering harassment, disparaging remarks, and years of slander and libel, after a judge ordered it to stop. His case is a borough matter, not a legislative one.

People should read and get themselves educated before commenting.
For you California, learn respect, didn't anyone teach you not to name call, that you could have libel/slander charges brought (libel in this case). Twice here, you labeled a man you don't even know, and they don't tolerate that here, and I don't tolerate it outside of here. I'll forward this to Mr. Wooten and let him decide what to do about it. This is uncalled for, he did nothing to you and neither did I. And that goes for Patriot08 too.

Oh and the Palin family should be in violation of processing the meat of the cow that was dropped and failing to report (only well after the fact).
Maybe we should write letters to their former employers? :P
Re: O.K.
By Democrat in Covina, CA Oct 10th 2008 at 11:59 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 11:59 pm EDT)
#3 that's my opinion. Do what you want.

As to your statement about me; that's your opinion. Do what you want.

You need to climb off. You're as scary to me as he is.

Back off my posts unless I respond to you or I'll report you. You are singleing me out or targeting me on this blog and the only one that attacks me, so please stop. You asked me about a week ago to not respond to you and now you are breaking that request yourself.
Re: O.K.
By Democrat in Covina, CA Oct 11th 2008 at 12:07 am EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 12:07 am EDT)
Why someone would find sympathy for a man who tasers A KID suprises me. Poor police officer will all his authority under the badge, takes a kid and tasers him. hmmmmmmm
Re: O.K. doe key
By Piritlel Oct 11th 2008 at 12:18 am EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 12:18 am EDT)
This isn't your post, it's Pat riots post, you commented here and I commented on your comment.

You did not stop when I asked you to, you called me names, both you and Patriot.

Now, do you see how it feels to have your comments and posts muddied? I only responded with my opinions, why would I scar you? What's scary, what did I do? Noda.
Re: O.K. doe key
By Democrat in Covina, CA Oct 11th 2008 at 12:26 am EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 12:26 am EDT)
Hey, no more. If I met someone like you on the street, I'd be frightened out of my skull. No more talking to you. You keep writing wierd stuff to me when I post, or respond, and it's getting a little freaky. So, no more, no talking to you.
Re: O.K. doe key
By Piritlel Oct 11th 2008 at 12:29 am EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 12:29 am EDT)
Besides my response was to Pat riot, follow the margins...

You, both show your colors (sock puppet?), can't post links, then attack people when no one was talking to you because you didn't look at the margins, and calling it spam...eye roll. If you don't want comments, then you probably shouldn't be here BUILDING THE PARTY, but calling the politicians dirty.
Re: O.K. doe key
By Patriot08 Oct 11th 2008 at 12:37 am EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 12:37 am EDT)
It's "IT!"

Leterrip=Pirretel!!
OH
By Patriot08 Oct 11th 2008 at 12:41 am EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 12:41 am EDT)
And it's somewhat ignorant to say that politicians aren't dirty.

They all are to some extent.

Check out how much Biden has received from lobbyists. That's a pleasant little sum.

:)
Re: OH
By Piritlel Oct 11th 2008 at 1:16 am EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 1:16 am EDT)
All politicians take PAC, bundler and a host of lobbyists, public, or federal matching money.

You mean you've never received and email where a legislator is requesting you donate for so and so in another state, or their own state because a seat is up for election? You apparently don't know how they operate.


Here's a start: Read and learn

Barack has full disclosure
Link
and
Link

McCain
Link
and
Link
Re: OH
By Piritlel Oct 11th 2008 at 1:26 am EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 1:26 am EDT)
Re: O.K. doe key
By Patriot08 Oct 11th 2008 at 12:29 am EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 12:29 am EDT)
Some still need to go back to their own post as they are just making fools of themselves.

Calling names? OoooKaaaay.

Scary is them jumping on every post and starting crap to prevent discussion.

Kind of like how they spam the entire blog with 5 posts at a time so no one can get a blog posted.
  
And Another Comment
By Patriot08 Oct 10th 2008 at 11:07 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 11:07 pm EDT)
Trooper Wooten should have been fired already.

Reprimands are not sufficient in this case, as he also threatened the life of his father-in-law.

He's bad news. He should not be allowed to abuse HIS power as a state trooper.
Re: And Another Comment
By Patriot08 Oct 10th 2008 at 11:17 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 11:17 pm EDT)
Oh, and for those that are interested, lible is saying something UNTRUE.

Wooten tasered his stepson, threatened a family member's LIFE, and is not fit to be a trooper.

In my opinion, he is definitely an asshole.

I have been in that same situation and I have children. Thank goodness I'm not governor!
Re: And Another Comment
By Piritlel Oct 10th 2008 at 11:24 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 11:24 pm EDT)
Libel, not lible.

Libel is the written words, not SAYING...that's slander.

Libel is like writing letters and misquoting someone else by prefacing their letter, filling it with falsehoods, fabrications in an attempt to smear someone else, then it's only a matter of time to find them and serve them with a libel suite.

The stepson's life was not threatened, he lived. It's using poor judgment to use a training tool.
Re: And Another Comment
By m.marsh Oct 10th 2008 at 11:47 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 11:47 pm EDT)
'Poor judgement' to use a taser on a child? How can you seek to minimize such a horrific act?
Re: And Another Comment
By Patriot08 Oct 10th 2008 at 11:57 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 11:57 pm EDT)
That's what I feel m.marsh.

"Poor judgment????"

He's an adult for God's sakes. If it were someone else doing the tasering, they would be prosecuted!!

He STILL has his job.

Ewhen will he use "poor judgment" next? When he's pissed off and arrests someone and beats them up?

He can't even control his anger with children!
Re: And Another Comment
By Piritlel Oct 10th 2008 at 11:59 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 11:59 pm EDT)
Because I know the facts, I read the official reports at adn, it was not a loaded taser gun, it was a training tool, and there were no probes, just lil clips like a battery and I read the testimony from the man who actually developed the taser gun, and he said even if he did use a taser at low voltage for one second, this child would not have even flinched.

BTW, children have been tazed in schools, on buses and other places, I have spoken out against the use of them on ANY one, I'm a nurse and this could cause medical complications for anyone. I also got tazed myself by someone only trying to show me and slipped, it was on full power...could have died. So, yeah, I'm against them.

This event between a father and son was not a punishment, the child asked, he did NOT get a jolt whatsoever, so people need to get the facts straight before judging others. If we started down that path, we're all in jail without trials. We'd have to prove ourselves innocent.
Re: And Another Comment
By Democrat in Covina, CA Oct 11th 2008 at 12:21 am EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 12:21 am EDT)
No jolt, then why use it...that's wierd in itself.
Re: And Another Comment
By Piritlel Oct 11th 2008 at 12:35 am EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 12:35 am EDT)
Thought you weren't going to respond because I scare you. Bruhahahah

You did not read the police report, so why talk about it?

No jolt, means no electrical charge, there was NO CARTRIDGEEEEE, get it? It wasn't even a tazer gun, you did NOT READ the reports, I did. And you apparently didn't watch the CNN special either, where he verbally explained it many times. Reading and listening comes in handy before judging and hanging someone.
Re: And Another Comment
By Patriot08 Oct 11th 2008 at 12:45 am EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 12:45 am EDT)
OMG.

Truly frightening,

Talk about an elephant in the room.

Leave!
Re: And Another Comment
By Patriot08 Oct 11th 2008 at 12:11 am EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 12:11 am EDT)
Oh, the stepson LIVED!

Thank goodness for that.
Re: And Another Comment
By Piritlel Oct 11th 2008 at 12:44 am EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 12:44 am EDT)
The son asked him to do it, he was showing off for a friend. This was not a disciplinary action or controlling issue, like you and your feind here.
Re: And Another Comment
By Patriot08 Oct 11th 2008 at 12:51 am EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 12:51 am EDT)
Well dang!

Then by all means, DO IT!
Re: And Another Comment
By Piritlel Oct 10th 2008 at 11:20 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 11:20 pm EDT)
Then why don't you get busy and write a letter to the Borough of Wasilla and get their guide lines and bylaws changed about hiring/firing, reprimands, and executive sessions, you think you know it all. You're good at that, aren't you? You're a paralegal that spends her entire day here and writes letters, right? Ever misquote anything? I really don't think you're a paralegal, how are we to know. You keep saying it, but I don't even think you're in Texas either. How are we to know? Sound familiar? :P
Re: And Another Comment
By Patriot08 Oct 10th 2008 at 11:30 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 11:30 pm EDT)
Hmmmm. Someone needs to go back to their own blog.

What's being posted makes no sense and has nothing to do with my blog.

Weird.
Re: And Another Comment
By Piritlel Oct 10th 2008 at 11:52 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 11:52 pm EDT)
What? talking about respect, not pre-judging others, not disobeying the rules here by name calling and labeling, spelling the word "libel" properly and proclaiming that "Barack Obama is a good politician"...isn't understandable? What do you not understand? Drinking too much?

Well, understand this, this has been brought to the attention of DNC Chair, and if people here think "Barack Obama is a dirty politician," then they can decide after an investigation what justice will be served.
Comments do make sense, especially when they are in response to other peoples comments, to what was posted.
I concur, strange to stay in a place where you are transparent and people are watching this.
Re: And Another Comment
By Patriot08 Oct 12th 2008 at 12:42 pm EDT (Updated Oct 12th 2008 at 12:42 pm EDT)
You don't make sense!

Talking about what I do, where I live, and "writing letters to employers"??? You've been saying that every time I post. You think that makes sense? You think that has anything to do with ANY of the blogs?

No. That doesn't make sense.

Are you speaking some kind of code? WHAT are you talking about?

I told you to stay off my posts. I'm sorry that you're fascinated with me for some reason, but really-you need to move on. I'm not going to bother trying to decipher what the heck your repeated nonsense means.

Leave me alone.
Re: And Another Comment
By Piritlel Oct 11th 2008 at 12:04 am EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 12:04 am EDT)
That's a lil over exaggerating.
Re: And Another Comment
By Patriot08 Oct 10th 2008 at 11:33 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 11:33 pm EDT)
S-U-I-T.

Spell it.
Re: And Another Comment
By Piritlel Oct 11th 2008 at 12:40 am EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 12:40 am EDT)
No, it's lawsuit.

But if your French, or work real estate.
Re: And Another Comment
By Patriot08 Oct 11th 2008 at 12:53 am EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 12:53 am EDT)
Some keep saying S-U-I-T-E.
Re: And Another Comment
By Patriot08 Oct 11th 2008 at 1:35 am EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 1:35 am EDT)
You are the only one that cares where I live and what I do for a living.

Why? God only knows.
  
Even CNN didn't get the facts right
By Piritlel Oct 10th 2008 at 11:28 pm EDT (Updated Oct 10th 2008 at 11:28 pm EDT)
It's called "At will" firing. She abused it.
Re: Even CNN didn't get the facts right
By Piritlel Oct 11th 2008 at 1:24 am EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 1:24 am EDT)
Link

show me the lobby money
Re: Even CNN didn't get the facts right
By Piritlel Oct 11th 2008 at 1:28 am EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 1:28 am EDT)
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.
Obama is a fine politician and so is Biden.

So, if you think our incumbents are dirty, you know where the door is.
Re: Even CNN didn't get the facts right
By Patriot08 Oct 11th 2008 at 1:31 am EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 1:31 am EDT)
The freaks come out at night.
Re: Even CNN didn't get the facts right
By Patriot08 Oct 11th 2008 at 1:29 am EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 1:29 am EDT)
Show us YOU leaving with your paranoia and other baggage, and marching back to your OWN posts where paranoia and craziness is welcome and encouraged.

March.
Re: Even CNN didn't get the facts right
By Piritlel Oct 11th 2008 at 11:37 pm EDT (Updated Oct 11th 2008 at 11:37 pm EDT)
I'm voting for BARACK OBAMA AND BIDEN FOR CHANGE!
who are you voting for? Let's see, it's Ralph Nadar, or the Green party? Green.
??
By Patriot08 Oct 12th 2008 at 12:45 pm EDT (Updated Oct 12th 2008 at 12:45 pm EDT)
You don't make sense!

Talking about what I do, where I live, and "writing letters to employers"??? You've been saying that every time I post.
You think that makes sense? You think that has anything to do with ANY of the blogs? No. That doesn't make sense.

Are you speaking some kind of code? WHAT are you talking about?

I told you to stay off my posts. I'm sorry that you're fascinated with me for some reason, but really-you need to move on. I'm not going to bother trying to decipher what the heck your repeated gibberish means.

Leave me alone.
Re: Even CNN didn't get the facts right
By Piritlel Oct 13th 2008 at 7:38 pm EDT (Updated Oct 13th 2008 at 7:38 pm EDT)
I'm voting for BARACK OBAMA AND BIDEN FOR CHANGE!
who are you voting for? Let's see, it's Ralph Nadar, or the Green party? Green.