Enter Tavis Smiley journalist and advocate of the black agenda. Tavis host a yearly symposium State of Black America. Every year after the Sotu address. He invites all candidates to adress the conference. Here is what happened when the invite was extended to Senator Obama.
Commentary by TAVIS SMILEY
Senator Barack Obama and the State of the Black Union 2008
Tom Joyner Morning Show
Thursday, February 14, 2008
By now many, if not most of you, have either read or heard about the letter faxed to me by Senator
Barack Obama yesterday to officially inform me that he would not be attending the State of theBlack Union symposium next Saturday, February 23, in New Orleans, live on C-SPAN. The letterwas apparently made public on the Internet by the Obama campaign.
This morning a few thoughts now about the letter, about Senator Obama and for that matter, about
Michelle Obama.
First, I want to thank Senator Obama for his letter, although I regret his decision. I said on Tuesday
and I reiterate today, that I believe that this is a critical miscalculation and a missed opportunity.
Having said that, I also feel that should Senator McCain or Governor Huckabee, like Mr. Obama,
end up denying our invitation to appear at this annual Black think tank, it would also be for them as
well, in the long run, a critical miscalculation and a missed opportunity.
Particularly for Senator John McCain, who appears to now be the presumptive Republican nominee
and who decided, as you recall, not to appear last year before Black America in Baltimore.
Indeed, I personally expressed that sentiment to Senator McCain earlier this week. Don’t think that
in the general election, should he be the nominee, that he ain’t going to get reminded frequently that
he kept passing on opportunities to speak to Black and Brown audiences. That’s pretty much
Political Science 101. That’s going to happen, trust me.
Two. For the record, with regard to this letter and the statements made therein, my office was never
contacted by the Obama campaign offering Michelle Obama as a proxy speaker. It never happened.
No letter. No fax. No e-mail. No phone call. No document whatsoever from the Obama camp to
my office, ever, regarding Michelle Obama. She was never offered, it was never discussed.
Three. While I have great admiration and affection for Michelle Obama, had she been offered to us
I would have respectfully declined. Just as we would have declined had Hillary Clinton offered Bill
Clinton; had John McCain offered Cindy McCain; had Mike Huckabee suggested Janet Huckabee.
By any measure, by any measure, Michelle Obama’s personal story is empowering and inspiring. Iam moved by her personal story, as I have been, since I first met her. From the South side of
Chicago to Princeton, to Harvard Law, it is a quintessential American story of overcoming.
That said, last year at Howard, live on PBS, we spoke to candidates only. And that’s what we intend
to do next Saturday, February 23, in New Orleans, live on C-SPAN, speak to candidates only, with
all due respect.
And speaking of Howard, point number four. When we invited Senator Obama last year to
Howard, with all of the other announced Democratic candidates at the time, so many people, so
many people, said publicly, that Tavis is stacking the deck in Obama’s favor. Black college. Black
book. Black audience. Black journalists. Black moderator. “Smiley is stacking the deck for
Obama,” they said.
The Washington Post Editorial Board said that to me to my face. “Aren’t you stacking the deck for
Mr. Obama?” Now, eight months later, another simple invitation, along with all the other
remaining viable candidates, and now he’s being boxed in by me?
Respectfully, that dog just won’t hunt. Because by that logic, at this point in the campaign, any
gathering of Black thought-leaders, opinion-makers and influencers who invite Senator Obama to
appear on stage at a nationally televised event, that invitation --- in and of itself, given that logic ---
would be tantamount to “boxing him in.”
This was simply an invitation, nothing more. There has not been, there is not now, nor will there
be, any effort on my part to snap on the Obama campaign, or the McCain campaign or the
Huckabee campaign, if they choose not to attend. It was just an invitation to him and every other
candidate. Accept or reject. An invitation, nothing more, nothing less.
I’ve lost count now of how many debates the Democrats have had to address other issues that, in
fact, do matter to us. But I can tell you exactly how many times they’ve gathered to specifically
address our issues. There is no comparison.
Point number five. Senator Obama is on a mission. As he suggested in his letter, his mission is to
become the next President of the United States. And I ain’t mad at him. As I’ve said before, and I’ll
say it again, I revel in his historic run for the White House. As a Black man, I celebrate his past
accomplishments. I celebrate his future aspirations.
Respectfully, I knew Barack Obama long before most of us learned to pronounce his name
correctly. So long ago, in fact, that years ago Barack Obama was working with the kids in my
Foundation, speaking to them about leadership development way back when.
I have no personal animus toward Barack Obama.
To quote that great philosopher, George Wallace, “I love him and there ain’t nothing he can do
about it!” That said, I love Black people, too. And I have a vocation. I have a calling. I have a
purpose. And since this ain’t just about me, you have a purpose too. You have a calling, you have a
vocation as well.
And I would hope, this morning, that at the center of our collective calling, is an unconditional love
for Black people. His job right now is to get elected. Our job is to do our part to ensure that
whoever gets elected will be held accountable to the issues that matter most to Black people.
And in that regard, all that I have ever tried to do, with the media platforms, including this one, that
I have been blessed to have access to, is to attempt to speak a love language, to ask critical
questions, to engage in sober assessment and to counsel wise enthusiasm.
If Barack Obama is your candidate, I ain’t mad at you! If Hillary Clinton is your candidate, I ain’t
mad at you! I am not personally in the endorsement business. My small part is to engage in
Socratic questioning. As a Black person, a member of the media, I’ve said many times on this
program, my job is to ask questions, raise issues, address topics, and profile people that otherwise
wouldn’t get that kind of air play.
Now, as the old folk used to say, “I done spoke my piece.”
Senator Clinton has decided to join us. Senator Obama has decided not to. Senator McCain and
Governor Huckabee, we shall see.
But once again, it has never, ever been about them. It has always been about us. We cannot
confuse candidates with the cause. The cause of suffering Black people who are catching hell every
day.
So, I personally; I can only speak for Tavis, I personally have no intention, no interest in discussing
this matter beyond this commentary no matter what’s said about me. Except to promote the
Symposium, which I’ve done every year for almost 10 years now.
I’m told by the folk in the Lt. Governor’s office in Louisiana that it looks like we will have the
largest gathering of volunteers for a single day next Friday on our Day of Service, since Katrina hit
back in 2005. That’s what matters. Loving and serving everyday Black people.
Our conversation next Saturday promises to be spirited, soulful and inspiring.
Finally this morning, as I always say…today, more than ever…love wins. Love wins. Love wins.
Happy Valentine’s Day!
To hear Tavis’ commentary, please visit www.tavistalks.com


I respect Tavis a great deal and I will go to his website and read this.
Tavis made a wrong move, Bob Johnson made a bad move and these folk are an embarrassment to themselves and their attempt to speak for Blacks in general. When you stand for anything, you stand for nothing. In 2008 these two have stood for nothing!
OBAMA Commander in Chief 2009!
Obama will just smile and turn a phrase, and hope people will forget that he snubbed them.
Thats not very Obama-like.
It is really sad how we as black people eat our own. Obama supporters scoff at the notion that he isnt "black enough" whatever that means but then accuse black activist as not being "black enough" for not blindly supporting Obama.
I have watched several of the state of the black unions. Tried to make it to the last one but those trips cost money.
The conference itself is free so if any of you are in the New orleans area check it out. IT willbe broadcast live on CSPAN.
Tavis is a fair journalist who has given candidates heat when they have refused to address the black comnunity whether it is at his forums or others.
If Clinton isn't allowed to send a surrogate neither should Obama. If he is supposed to be this great black leader that will lead me to the promise land, then he should be willing to sit and listen and yes actually do more than give a pretty speech but answer some questions with susbtance.
It like I have been saying what's good for the Goose....
He's NOT supposed to be this great BLACK leader who will LEAD you to the promised land, he is a great leader who is African-American and emphasizes the importance of people working with the government, not just being led by it. Don't confuse the two. He's running for President of the UNITED STATES, not President of Black America, and this election is very close.
And as for Clinton attending--why not question her motives? She just accepted her invitation. Could it be that it's because she knows she's losing (lost) what she perceived to be her lock on the Black vote? Could it be that she needs all the free coverage she can get since her campaign overspent?
I respect Tavis Smiley for trying to keep African-Americans informed on IMPORTANT issues. This, however, is not one of them.
And as an aside, what exactly is accomplished as a result of these annual meetings?
So, how does he keep a balance of calming fears on one hand and not appearing neglectful on the other?
I wrote about this in the below link, "Backdoor Blackness"
Link
He ought to be there.
People here have to be baby fed because they can't digest the ugly truth of inequality. Do you really think that they could stomach Obama verbalizing and philosophizing in reference to what some here term as separatism? Come on, give me a break!
This underlies my problem with the Obama campaign. About a year ago, I switched away from supporting him because he refused any sort of commitment to a left wing agenda. Why should I support a guy who isn't willing to stand up for me? He's claiming his leadership will unite people, yet he doesn't fulfil the strong leadership role of taking up controversial issues and defending them in the public debate.
Obama supporters give him a free ride on everything it seems. Just today we saw a silly post declaring that his cosmetic health care plan is far superior to Hillary Clintons. I've worked locally in my community to pass H.R. 676 socialized health care, and I can tell you that his plan falls well short of what needs to be done.
Of all the original candidates, Obama had the least experience and gave the least amount of detail as to what his plans were to fix the system. Obama supporters attack attack and attack, but they refuse to criticize their own guy. He's too likeable, and that's exactly why I'd prefer the less likeable, less publicly trusted individual for President.
This isn't a faith based exercise. His mandate will be strong, but his commitment to our issues will be weak. I'm not excited about this.
Thanks for you feedback.
Kevin and Tonya are not he only African American Voices on PB. I too am black. The black enough comment I made earlier was made because I think the whole Premise of being black enough or too black is ridiculous.
I think it also is equally ridculous that I shouldn't hold Obama to the shame standards I do a white candidate. IF it is ok to ask Hillary what have you done for me lately it should also not be out of line to ask Obama the same.
I'm sick of people posting negatives about Hillary and wanting specifics and then giving Obama a pass on everything.
So let me get this straight Hillary is obligated to address black folks but Obama doesn't have to because he might offend the Latte Liberals?
People can't be naive and believe that if Obama start to discuss specific African American issues that he would keep his across the board support and support in predominately white states.
So what you are saying to me is that it is ok for him to pander to racist whites but it is not ok for Hillary to pander to blacks or women?
So,when Hillary was doing that it was triangulating and politics as usual but when Obama does it just good old campaigning.
So which is it pandering or campaigning. Obama felt it important enough to attend last year.
What has changed in a year could it be that it is he who is taking the black vote for granted?
Could it be that he is betting that we will vote monolithically for the black man without asking him the tough questions?
I'm more than sure that it is because that is how his staff treats black voters. Imagine their shock when I had the audacity to ask questions about his healthcare plan and about his stance on nuclear energy.
They didn't have time for this black woman.
and I agree with you