Electoral Science, just something I find Interesting
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
I've been looking at a bunch of Data for the election and I have found something interesting. It is my theory that Obama should be the rightful winner of Indiana and California. In California Obama won at the polls but due to early voting (when Clinton was way ahead) he lost the state. In Indiana Republicans causing mischief caused Obama to Loose. the GOP was 10% of the Voting Population and Clinton won 54-46. Had it not been for them causing mischief not only would the % of GOP in the Voting Pop be smaller, but Obama would have carried it. thus Clinton's 14,000 Vote Margin would have been about a 30,000 Vote Margin For Obama had the GOP not interfered. I Find this Interesting but pointless by now.

Reader Comments
  
Re: how about these numbers
By Barbara"Obama/Biden"Hussein Jun 30th 2008 at 11:25 pm EDT
That doesnt matter either, because there is not enough to keep us from moving into the White House Jan20th, 2009


((fist bump))=Obama08/12
Re: how about these numbers
By Sue Sue's Straight Talk Express Jun 30th 2008 at 11:46 pm EDT
Are you paid by Clinton or McCain?
  
move on
By Barbara"Obama/Biden"Hussein Jun 30th 2008 at 11:23 pm EDT
move on.


The only interesting fact we can draw from that information is that we have Calif in Obamaland for the General Election against Mcbush.

((fist bump))
  
Good for you
By Jacob Clark Jun 30th 2008 at 11:25 pm EDT
Research is never a waste of time. Now let's look to November and January!
  
Great Job
By Sue Sue's Straight Talk Express Jun 30th 2008 at 11:48 pm EDT
Spencer,

You have done a good job with the research. If the Clintonites would simply recognize. He would have done better in Ohio and PA as well had she not enacted Karl Rove scare tactics.

We are Americans GD. What are we affraid of?