The Repeal of Glass-Steagall Act is to Blame for the Current Crisis not our Neighbors
|
|
| Also listed in: African American Democrats | Durham County Democratic Party | Friends of the Southern Poverty Law Center | People against Poverty |
After the Great Depression, Congress conducted numerous hearings and determined that it was ultimately the mixing of �commercial� and �investment� banking industries and the inherent conflicts of interest and fraud in some banking institutions� securities activities that caused the collapse of our financial markets. Sound familiar? Congress passed the Banking Act of 1933 commonly known as the Glass-Steagall Act which prohibited the mixing of these activities in order to prevent this from ever happening again.
In 1999, Congress repealed the Glass-Steagall Act and passed in its stead the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act which enabled commercial lenders to underwrite, trade and purchase instruments such as mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations.
Consumer groups across the nation vehemently opposed the breaking down of these barriers, we warned that this was dangerous and could lead to another financial collapse. Instead of heeding our warnings, Congressional leaders in the Senate viciously attacked the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) and included amendments to eliminate it as a Red Herring. Our allies in Washington capitulated in order to protect CRA, we were placed on the defensive and we blinked.
The result, in less than ten years time the financial markets have crashed and once again Wall Street and K Street are holding our neighbors and neighborhoods hostage pointing the gun at taxpayers and saying it is the fault of CRA . This time we are prepared for the fight, we will not sit silent, we will not blink and we will not rely on others to defend us.
In 1999 the State of North Carolina passed the first anti-predatory lending legislation in the nation followed by numerous cities and states across the country and what did Washington do? The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency stepped in on the side of the lenders and pre-empted these laws and said we could not protect our own communities.
In 2001-2002, anti-predatory lending ordinances in Atlanta GA, Dayton OH, and Philadelphia PA were all overturned or preempted by the federal government. Under pressure from Wall Street or K Street many cities including Toledo and Cleveland OH repealed their ordinances and too many states threatened by Wall Street weakened their existing laws or passed laws that were worst than doing nothing. Now they are demanding that we give them $700,000,000,000.
Deregulation and Greed caused this problem NOT OUR NEIGHBORS. Here is how this whole mess happened:
1. Our neighbors were constantly contacted by mail or by phone at strategic times of the year, early spring (home repairs), late summer (back to school, college), late fall-early winter (holiday season) and early January (holiday blues) when most families are a little short on cash. They were told that they could refinance and consolidate their debts AND have lower payments.
2. Our neighbor contacted the originator for more information. She was told that she would benefit from a �piggy-back� loan with a first lien of 80% and a second lien for 20% so she could avoid mortgage insurance and include the originator�s fees and other costs in the second lien.
3. The originator did not tell her the reason the payment would be lower than her old loan was due to a teaser rate ARM with payments that will escalate beyond her ability to repay after two or three years. Our neighbor did not know that taxes and insurance were not included in her payment until she received her tax bill or the lender charged her 4 times more for property insurance. The loan originator told our neighbor not to worry she could refinance before the rate adjusted. When our neighbor tried to refinance, she discovered it was impossible because of a pre-payment penalty or because she owed more than the house was worth.
4. The originator did not tell her that he had ABSOLUTELY NO DUTY to help her get the best loan she qualified for; in fact, Wall Street paid the originator MORE MONEY to put her in a loan with abusive features.
5. The loan originator then sold the loan to a lender who bundled our neighbor�s loan with other abusive loans and sold them as a mortgage backed security. Wall Street knew that 30-36%% of these loans would go into foreclosure and the law required them to tell the investor BUT NOT OUR NEIGHBOR!
6. Wall Street paid the rating agencies (Standard and Poor�s and Moody�s) lots and lots of money to put lipstick on a pig (BBB rating or less) and call it a beauty queen (AAA rating).
7. The investors purchased these AAA rated instruments insured them against default and leveraged the loan 30-60 times its real value. That�s right they took our neighbor�s $100,000 loan and leveraged it to get $3,000,000 to $6,000,000.
8. Our neighbor can not make the escalating monthly payments. She asked for help from the servicer only to discover that she has fewer workout options than are available to borrowers with mortgage insurance.
We are opposed to any bailout of Wall Street without relief for our neighbors and neighborhoods. Not one penny of the $700 billion has been set aside to help our neighbors. We all remember the adage those who do not know their history are condemned to repeat it. As fair housing and consumer advocates we will not allow our neighbors to bear the brunt of this crisis while those whose greed and reckless disregard of our credit rights profit.
In 1999, Congress repealed the Glass-Steagall Act and passed in its stead the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act which enabled commercial lenders to underwrite, trade and purchase instruments such as mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations.
Consumer groups across the nation vehemently opposed the breaking down of these barriers, we warned that this was dangerous and could lead to another financial collapse. Instead of heeding our warnings, Congressional leaders in the Senate viciously attacked the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) and included amendments to eliminate it as a Red Herring. Our allies in Washington capitulated in order to protect CRA, we were placed on the defensive and we blinked.
The result, in less than ten years time the financial markets have crashed and once again Wall Street and K Street are holding our neighbors and neighborhoods hostage pointing the gun at taxpayers and saying it is the fault of CRA . This time we are prepared for the fight, we will not sit silent, we will not blink and we will not rely on others to defend us.
In 1999 the State of North Carolina passed the first anti-predatory lending legislation in the nation followed by numerous cities and states across the country and what did Washington do? The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency stepped in on the side of the lenders and pre-empted these laws and said we could not protect our own communities.
In 2001-2002, anti-predatory lending ordinances in Atlanta GA, Dayton OH, and Philadelphia PA were all overturned or preempted by the federal government. Under pressure from Wall Street or K Street many cities including Toledo and Cleveland OH repealed their ordinances and too many states threatened by Wall Street weakened their existing laws or passed laws that were worst than doing nothing. Now they are demanding that we give them $700,000,000,000.
Deregulation and Greed caused this problem NOT OUR NEIGHBORS. Here is how this whole mess happened:
1. Our neighbors were constantly contacted by mail or by phone at strategic times of the year, early spring (home repairs), late summer (back to school, college), late fall-early winter (holiday season) and early January (holiday blues) when most families are a little short on cash. They were told that they could refinance and consolidate their debts AND have lower payments.
2. Our neighbor contacted the originator for more information. She was told that she would benefit from a �piggy-back� loan with a first lien of 80% and a second lien for 20% so she could avoid mortgage insurance and include the originator�s fees and other costs in the second lien.
3. The originator did not tell her the reason the payment would be lower than her old loan was due to a teaser rate ARM with payments that will escalate beyond her ability to repay after two or three years. Our neighbor did not know that taxes and insurance were not included in her payment until she received her tax bill or the lender charged her 4 times more for property insurance. The loan originator told our neighbor not to worry she could refinance before the rate adjusted. When our neighbor tried to refinance, she discovered it was impossible because of a pre-payment penalty or because she owed more than the house was worth.
4. The originator did not tell her that he had ABSOLUTELY NO DUTY to help her get the best loan she qualified for; in fact, Wall Street paid the originator MORE MONEY to put her in a loan with abusive features.
5. The loan originator then sold the loan to a lender who bundled our neighbor�s loan with other abusive loans and sold them as a mortgage backed security. Wall Street knew that 30-36%% of these loans would go into foreclosure and the law required them to tell the investor BUT NOT OUR NEIGHBOR!
6. Wall Street paid the rating agencies (Standard and Poor�s and Moody�s) lots and lots of money to put lipstick on a pig (BBB rating or less) and call it a beauty queen (AAA rating).
7. The investors purchased these AAA rated instruments insured them against default and leveraged the loan 30-60 times its real value. That�s right they took our neighbor�s $100,000 loan and leveraged it to get $3,000,000 to $6,000,000.
8. Our neighbor can not make the escalating monthly payments. She asked for help from the servicer only to discover that she has fewer workout options than are available to borrowers with mortgage insurance.
We are opposed to any bailout of Wall Street without relief for our neighbors and neighborhoods. Not one penny of the $700 billion has been set aside to help our neighbors. We all remember the adage those who do not know their history are condemned to repeat it. As fair housing and consumer advocates we will not allow our neighbors to bear the brunt of this crisis while those whose greed and reckless disregard of our credit rights profit.


Ask not what YOU can do for the fascio-corporatist financiers and bankers of the wall street cabal - but demand what they can do for YOU !
It isn't important to me what they do for each other in washington.
What is important to me is what they do for ME - I would say "us" but their is no us in the solidarity sense so I will say ME.
And I do not want some vague promise of some supposed benefit some time in the future.
I want mine NOW just as the fascio-corporatist financiers and bankers of the wall street cabal want their's now - like by friday.
Far as I'm concerned they may have what they want if I get what I want and the absolute minimum that I want is:
1. Free healthcare for all citizens.
2. Full Social Security retrirement at age 50.
3. $15 per hour minimum wage.
4. High protective tarriff on all goods manufactured outside the U.S. by "American" companies.
5. Tax rate of 75% on trust funds.
6. Confiscation of all property of all shareholders with an estimated wealth of $100,000 or more.
7. The elimination of taxation on incomes of less than $75,000 per year.
And you know what that is still a good deal - for them.
Lie and distract. Now the McCain playbook.
Nice going Rob. Is the pay good?
1999 was the most significant year for this atrosity----
in our nation
and thanks for bringing up what happened in North Carolina--and how everything (evidence) of followed shows the "set up"
I like this commentary because is also shows how we did have many many leaders(citizens) out there way back then, trying to stop it from moving forward.
I am very concerned that folks will fall for the slight of hand once again. Afterall, how is it the Democratic leaders are pushing a bailout plan proposed by BUSH when his own party won't support it.
Of course no one supports these ideas - they are going to spend YOUR money so why should they.
If you're silly enough to let them.
Doesn't mean my proposals are wrong - just means you are easy.