Bill Richardson's plan for Iraq
|
|
| Also listed in: Dems Debate & Discuss |
The Iraq War is costing Americans $8 billion each month. By implementing my plan to de-authorize the war and withdraw ALL troops by the end of the year, we can start redirecting these funds toward what matters most for Americans: improving education, expanding access to quality health care, and addressing the REAL security threats like the Taliban, nuclear proliferation, and global warming. My seven-point ‘New Realism Plan for Iraq’ describes in detail what is required:
Troops Out in 2007
We should get our troops out of Iraq this year. Our continued presence there only enables the Iraqi factions to delay making the hard political choices they need to make to end the civil war.
No Residual Forces Left Behind
We must remove ALL of our troops. There should be no residual US forces left in Iraq. Most Iraqis, and most others in the region, believe that we are there for their oil, and this perception is exploited by Al Qaeda, other insurgents, and anti-American Shia groups. By announcing that we intend to remove all troops, we would deprive them of this propaganda tool.
Congressional De-Authorization of War
President Bush has demonstrated neither competence nor honesty nor a sense of reality in his conduct of this war.
Congress must continue to use the power of the purse without cutting funds for troops on the ground, but we should also go one step further. Congress should assert its constitutional authority and pass a resolution de-authorizing the war under the War Powers Act. Congress can then set a military pull-out date and appropriate funds accordingly for the re-deployment of troops.
Promote Iraqi Reconciliation
We should promote an Iraqi Reconciliation Conference to bring the factions together to seek compromises and to begin confidence-building measures, including the end of militia violence. Our redeployment will give us more leverage than we have now, caught in the crossfire, to get the Iraqis to reconcile.
Work With All Neighbors and Allies
We should convene a regional conference to secure the cooperation of all of Iraq's neighbors -- including Syria and Iran -- in promoting peace and stability. Among the key objectives of such a conference should be guarantees of non-interference, as well as the creation of a multilateral force of UN peacekeepers, should the Iraqis request one. The US should support such a force, but it should be composed of non-US, primarily Muslim troops.
Global Cooperation in Reconstruction
We should convene a donor conference to fund Iraq's reconstruction. The United States needs to show the world that we intend to return to our tradition of being a trusted leader, not a unilateralist loner. The process of disengagement is an opportunity for us to show that we have turned the corner, and that we intend to rebuild our alliances, respect international law, and work with the international community.
Redeploy to Address Real Threats
We must redeploy some of our troops to stop the resurgence of the Taliban and to fight the real terrorists who attacked this country on 9-11. While all American troops in Iraq must be removed, we need to maintain a military presence in the region, including in Kuwait and in the Persian Gulf. We must have the regional capacity to use air power, special forces and other means to strike Al Qaeda anywhere. We do not need American troops in Iraq to perform this essential task.
We also must bring our National Guard home where they are needed for homeland security, and we must focus our energy and resources on real threats, such as nuclear proliferation, Al Qaeda, public health, and global warming.
Troops Out in 2007
We should get our troops out of Iraq this year. Our continued presence there only enables the Iraqi factions to delay making the hard political choices they need to make to end the civil war.
No Residual Forces Left Behind
We must remove ALL of our troops. There should be no residual US forces left in Iraq. Most Iraqis, and most others in the region, believe that we are there for their oil, and this perception is exploited by Al Qaeda, other insurgents, and anti-American Shia groups. By announcing that we intend to remove all troops, we would deprive them of this propaganda tool.
Congressional De-Authorization of War
President Bush has demonstrated neither competence nor honesty nor a sense of reality in his conduct of this war.
Congress must continue to use the power of the purse without cutting funds for troops on the ground, but we should also go one step further. Congress should assert its constitutional authority and pass a resolution de-authorizing the war under the War Powers Act. Congress can then set a military pull-out date and appropriate funds accordingly for the re-deployment of troops.
Promote Iraqi Reconciliation
We should promote an Iraqi Reconciliation Conference to bring the factions together to seek compromises and to begin confidence-building measures, including the end of militia violence. Our redeployment will give us more leverage than we have now, caught in the crossfire, to get the Iraqis to reconcile.
Work With All Neighbors and Allies
We should convene a regional conference to secure the cooperation of all of Iraq's neighbors -- including Syria and Iran -- in promoting peace and stability. Among the key objectives of such a conference should be guarantees of non-interference, as well as the creation of a multilateral force of UN peacekeepers, should the Iraqis request one. The US should support such a force, but it should be composed of non-US, primarily Muslim troops.
Global Cooperation in Reconstruction
We should convene a donor conference to fund Iraq's reconstruction. The United States needs to show the world that we intend to return to our tradition of being a trusted leader, not a unilateralist loner. The process of disengagement is an opportunity for us to show that we have turned the corner, and that we intend to rebuild our alliances, respect international law, and work with the international community.
Redeploy to Address Real Threats
We must redeploy some of our troops to stop the resurgence of the Taliban and to fight the real terrorists who attacked this country on 9-11. While all American troops in Iraq must be removed, we need to maintain a military presence in the region, including in Kuwait and in the Persian Gulf. We must have the regional capacity to use air power, special forces and other means to strike Al Qaeda anywhere. We do not need American troops in Iraq to perform this essential task.
We also must bring our National Guard home where they are needed for homeland security, and we must focus our energy and resources on real threats, such as nuclear proliferation, Al Qaeda, public health, and global warming.

Richardson is the first one I've seen that mentions the Afghanistan factor--you can see that he's looking at the bigger picture and thinking ahead--AND is not afraid to say what he will do.
My problem is that, IMO of course, Richardson's plan is not much different than all the other Dem plans.
a) of course we should pull our troops out, but it should be done responsibly. to pull out leaving the government like it is would be fool-hardy (imo, of course, lol). the government we helped create is not compatible with the people of Iraq and no amount of encouragement from us and the international community is going to change that. the govt needs to be modified.
b) we have spent 428 billion on the war to date. i TOTALLY agree that we have to stop hemmoraging this kind of money to iraq (imagine what we could have done to change america if we had spent an extra 428 billion here over the past four years?) But leaving without changing the circumstances will lead to even greater hemmoraging later. (Sorry, I KNOW I am spelling hemmoraging wrong!)
The violence in Iraq is a symptom, not the disease. If we do not try to cure the disease (part of which is this government that CANNOT effectively function, even if there was no violence), the violence will continue and it will spread and we will have to return and it will be bloodier and more expensive the second time around. History should have taught us that walking away from middle eastern countries in crisis is VERY unwise.
3) We TOTALLY need to involve the international community and Iraq's neighbors. But if we leave the country as it is, it seems like we are passing the problem WE created (and we COULD help fix) onto to everyone else. Kind of an international, "My bad!" with a "hey, guys, good luck with that!" Not only is it unwise (b/c there will be consequences), it is irresponsible and, IMO, will further tarnish our reputation internationally.
4) Am I allowed to point out why I think something won't work? I DO NOT want you to feel attacked! Or anyone else to feel that way. Ultimately, I will be happy with ANY dem in the WH (I just think Biden is the best dem, LMAO).