Bipartisanism under Republican control
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
Joe Lieberman is running with the idea that he is the better candidate for the U.S. Senate because he is a bipartisan. That would be all well and good if the Senate and the House of Representatives and the Executive weren't under the control of Republicans.

History shows us that Joe Lieberman is right when he says that bipartisanism is a way towards great progress in this country - but only when the White House is controlled by one party, and the House of Representatives or Senate are each controlled by a different party, and there is a very small margin held by either party in the other legislative house. At these times in American history great things have been done because there is a wonderful opportunity for give and take.

Joe is not right today, and he is wrong to break party lines - to forget that you leave the dance with the one that brung you.

We, the Democrats of this great Nation, need to take back control of the House of Representatives. We need to capture as many seats in the Senate as possible. Then, even if George Bush is president ... even if Lieberman is re-elected ... even if the Republicans maintain control of the Executive we can move this country back in the direction it was going at the end of the Clinton Era.

Reader Comments
No comments have been written yet.