<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" 
     xmlns:db="http://www.w3.org"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:ysrv="http://www.democrats.org">
  <channel>
    <title>Posts with the tag natural</title>
    <link>http://www.democrats.org/page/community/tag_rss/natural</link>
    <description></description>
                        <item>
            <title>Oil now, versus lose election!</title>
            <description>I have been an Obama supporter starting from before he became popular. Just as I had predicted Barack’s current success I have recently predicted that the cost of oil and it’s effects would become priority  number one with &lt;br /&gt;
voters. And it will, trust me! We must be willing to, while giving as much attention to environmental concerns as reasonably possible, explore for oil, coal, and natural gas immediately. We must retrieve and process our fossil fuels as soon as we can while frantically developing alternative energy sources with which to power our industry, motor vehicles and homes. Unfortunately, Mr. Bush and Mr. McCain have beaten Barack and the rest of our party to this unavoidable common sense approach. Barack will ultimately loss the election if he does not realize and act on the fact that our economy is presently and for the near future entirely dependant upon affordable and available fossil fuels and their derivatives. If we don’t act now we may not have the ability to research and develop the needed technologies to make us independent of these fossil fuels. The looming energy crises will put us into the basic survival mode, and the means for such activities will not be available as they currently are. Unless Barack and the rest of the Democrats get on board, the Republicans will continue to run things. Why can’t the Democratic party use some common sense. Why is it always one extreme or the other? It&#039;s embarrassing. To the Democrats I beg,… Please wake up??????? We need to get our nation back!    &lt;br /&gt;
I am a white 61 year old Vietnam vet and a retired building trades union supervisor who retired out of the engineering department at my last job. I am just trying to say many smart common sense people like myself (all races and colors) who want Barack to win and to have a couple of successful terms in office are very concerned that he has not picked up on this. I share many of his views and would like to see a prosperous period where we are not so preoccupied with the fossil fuel crises that we can&#039;t implement the needed policies etc. I pray for the sake of our party that Barack and the rest of the party quickly become aware of the gravity closing the door to the immediate pursuit of our reserves will have. This is one of the few mistakes we can make that will allow the Republicans to stay in office, and we are very likely currently making it.</description>
            <link>http://www.democrats.org/page/community/post/john%20A/CxsG</link>
            <comments>http://www.democrats.org/page/community/post/john%20A/CxsG/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:49:58 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.democrats.org/page/community/post/john%20A/CxsG</guid>
            <dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture></db:picture>
                <db:author_name>John</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>2</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.democrats.org/page/community/comment_rss/CxsG/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
                    <item>
            <title>Quest for Alternate Energy!</title>
            <description>Originally posted as a comment to blog positing entitled &quot;Fuel Alternatives&quot; by xKCGEx entitled &quot;Debate?&quot; posted by myself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would you care to? Lunar mining? Sounds like Buck Rodgers 21st century. Really are we going to shuttle mined fuels from the moon to earth? What would they be? Are we going to live on the mooon? That would be the most efficient use of that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solar satelites? Disconnected from earth like the moon would need to transport energy back to earth for its use here. Ok use lasers, now you have high energy lasers pointing at earth constantly and to what effect on things here?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PV its already known, large surface areas of PV arrays needed. Concentrated Solar gathering equipment is basically the same in area just using a different form of energy conversion. You only get so much energy per square meter from sun light, and you only get it during the day time.</description>
            <link>http://www.democrats.org/page/community/post/robertware/CXKN</link>
            <comments>http://www.democrats.org/page/community/post/robertware/CXKN/commentary#comments</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:44:29 EDT</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.democrats.org/page/community/post/robertware/CXKN</guid>
            <dc:creator>Robert Ware</dc:creator>
                        <db:profile>
                <db:picture>http://www.democrats.org/page/community/profile_picture/815536d52821356525_9vhntmvtl.jpg</db:picture>
                <db:author_name>Robert Ware</db:author_name>
                <db:school></db:school>
            </db:profile>
            <db:comment_count>3</db:comment_count>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.democrats.org/page/community/comment_rss/CXKN/</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
      </channel>
</rss>